User talk:Hektor/Archive 11

Xenia Tchoumitcheva

Hallo, i am a Swiss user of Wikipedia - could you please nominate for deletion Xenia Tchoumitcheva? The article is written like an advertisement and the person is not notable. The original creator of the article was banned from Wikipedia. Thank you Maurizio —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.15.112.70 (talk) 09:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Porsche Panamera deletion

Why delete it? It is a promotional picture by Porsche released on the internet for free public domain use. Let me clue you in on a little secret, images like these, although the manufacturer may hold the license, they willingly and freely allow anyone use so long as it isn't for profit, which Wikipedia doesn't do. So again, why delete it?

Red marquis (talk) 14:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chloé Mortaud

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tufacave (talk) 23:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Royal Picardy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Picardy.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 2009 Dakar Rally

A tag has been placed on 2009 Dakar Rally requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 30 December, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Van Rompuy I Government, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦^C 20:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 January, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Dakar Rally, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦^C 21:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Peugeot 3008.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Peugeot 3008.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Kennel

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Charles Kennel, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.galcit.caltech.edu/space50/program/speakers/KennelC.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Charles Kennel

A tag has been placed on Charles Kennel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Non-dropframe (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Charles Kennel. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Non-dropframe (talk) 22:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Charles Kennel. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Non-dropframe (talk) 23:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Hektor. You have new messages at Non-dropframe's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Araya (musician)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Araya (musician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non-notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Misarxist 05:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heath Ledger

I was who reverted your edit. I don't know well movies and I hadn't heared about this caracter. Of course as it is writen now it is all right. I just didn't understand the connection. I translate this article to Hungarian. --Ksanyi (talk) 13:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mercedes-GLK-3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mercedes-GLK-3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Favier.jpg

File:Favier.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Jean-Jacques Favier.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Jean-Jacques Favier.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Spirit beehive DVD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Spirit beehive DVD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current events

Please add external links to news sources that are written in English language, not in French. Jolly Ω Janner 21:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:J Bourboulon.jpg

Hi Hektor. Could you please provide a rationale tag for this image? Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Citroen ds inside.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Citroen ds inside.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Littell

Salut, j'ai vu que vous avez beaucoup écrit sur Jonathan Littell. J'ai beaucoup modifié l'article pendant le dernier mois. Peu être vous êtes encore intéressé sur lui pour en jeter un coup d'œil et faire quelques modifications? Evenfiel (talk) 01:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alexander Gerst

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Alexander Gerst. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Gerst. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Karen Gillan. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Maccy69 (talk) 20:57, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spaceflight crew

Starting a discussion about Template:Spaceflight crew regarding its aesthetics and whether it's an improvement on the text listing we had before. Please join in. Rillian (talk) 22:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Astronaut definition

Definition from our own article: Quote: "An astronaut or cosmonaut is a person trained by a human spaceflight program to command, pilot, or serve as a crew member of a spacecraft. "

Definition from NASA: "An astronaut is a person who pilots a spacecraft or works in space, particularly in the space program of the United States."

As far as your source, it is referring to the DoD's 1960s policy: "The term astronaut also has a meaning that is not connected with NASA activities. In the 1960's, the United States Department of Defense awarded the rating of astronaut to military and civilian pilots who flew aircraft higher than 50 miles (80 kilometers). Seven test pilots received this rating for flights in the X-15 rocket plane. Flights of the X-15 ended in 1968". This is not something done today for anyone who reaches "orbit". Just because someone has entered "orbit" does not automatically make them an astronaut. It is a profession, not a designation. Ansari is not a pilot, nor a trained astronaut; she served no official function, had no duties, and had no responsibilities during her flight. She was simply on the flight as a paying citizen, thus, she does not fit the criteria for the categories of astronaut. Ariel♥Gold 20:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

She trained as a spaceflight participant. The training is not astronaut training, it is emergency training, and basic familiarization with Soyuz equipment in the case of emergency. It does not make her an astronaut, and is no way the same as astronaut training. She does not call herself an astronaut or consider herself to be one. Ariel♥Gold 22:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you the URLs that show she was not trained as an astronaut. (spaceflight participant training is not the same as astronaut training) A paid participant is not considered an astronaut by RSA or by NASA, in any way, shape or form. Her article has references to support this. Read where she calls herself a "participant" in the ref in her article. Honestly, I cannot see why you would have an issue with this, an astronaut is a profession, not a designation given automatically to anyone who goes into space. She's not an astronaut. Ariel♥Gold 23:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kjell N. Lindgren

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kjell N. Lindgren, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=28600. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for TerreStar-1

On 1 July, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article TerreStar-1, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 18:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orion 17

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Orion 17, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nfitz (talk) 20:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just can't get my mind around how Orion missions in 2020 can pass the Crystal Ball test, when the US Presidential election in 2020 (or 2016 for that matter) doesn't. Shouldn't all these missions be simply redirected to List of Constellation missions? Nfitz (talk) 20:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you removed the prod. Can you give me some reason why you (must I assume) think it passes WP:NOCRYSTAL, because I don't get it; however I hate to start an AfD process if I'm missing the boat somehow. Nfitz (talk) 20:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Orion 17

An article that you have been involved in editing, Orion 17, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orion 17. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nfitz (talk) 02:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Waters of Mars

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to The Waters of Mars. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. And before you think about it, Digital Spy is not acceptable as they do not state where they got their facts. magnius (talk) 17:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Companion (Doctor Who). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. magnius (talk) 17:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not reverting for the sake of it, we NEED 100% reliable facts (the fact that wikipedia is littered with unreliable sources is no excuse). We have no idea where they plucked that surname from, for all we know they got it from a tabloid/tea lady/made it up, but equally they could have got got from an official source that we haven't seen yet. There is a very good chance that her surname is Brooke, in fact I'd put money on it, but unless the BBC, RTD or other equally reliable source states that fact, we have to consider that it could be inaccurate. magnius (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

River Song

In filming of 2010 season, the character played by Alex Kingston is obviously River Song, since the wreckage of the Byzantium can be seen in some of the pictures. However, I don't think that a picture a the little deduction attached is a reliable source. Hektor (talk) 12:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

All that falls under original research, which is why we cannot specifically say that she is River...the very same thing stops us from identifying John Simm as the Master in the Xmas 2009 specials. It is 99.99999% likely that she is River, but until we are told by the BBC, we have to assume that she could be a twin sister, ancestor...even a shape shiting alien is a possibility. magnius (talk) 12:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are refering to your recent removal of the information regarding the Byzantium, and suggesting that it was me that inncluded it, I didn't add that, check your facts. magnius (talk) 12:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clotilde Reiss

Merci pour la creation de l' article sur Clotilde Reiss ! Christophe Neff (talk) 08:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If only it could help. Hektor (talk) 09:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Willy ronis.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Willy ronis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:J Bourboulon.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:J Bourboulon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logo Citroen.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Citroen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Anh-dao traxel.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anh-dao traxel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Somaly mam.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Somaly mam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Aslan.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aslan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Seize the moment.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seize the moment.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Karen Gillan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. magnius (talk) 09:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reason provided. Karen Gillan is alive and free substitute can therefore be created. I leave the image in Amy Pond because I do think that finding a substitute for the image in character is not feasible. If you disagree please revert. Hektor (talk) 09:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for HTV-1

On 10 September 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article HTV-1, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

BorgQueen (talk) 18:17, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Irina Bokova

On 22 September 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Irina Bokova, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 19:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for LCROSS

On 13 November 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article LCROSS, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 22:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Stuart (photographer)

No, I wasn't kidding [1]. Perhaps you could explain on the article talk page why you think he meets WP:N? Rhomb (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Metro3.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metro3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 04:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ITN/C

Please don't alter someone else's post. You are welcome to reply to Dumelow's post, rather than changing it. --BorgQueen (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Malika Ménard

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Malika Ménard. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Saratlas

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Saratlas. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saratlas. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of STS-135

I have nominated STS-135, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STS-135. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Colds7ream (talk) 00:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peugeot partner2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peugeot partner2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Renault megane third generation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Renault megane third generation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Citroen c airscape.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Citroen c airscape.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saratlas.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saratlas.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The End of Time

Hello, just to be absolutely sure you follow what's happening on the talk page, here is the original talk page comment, with spelling mistakes, made back in May. Here is another editor rather pointlessly correcting that post, months later. This undo then is simply restoring the comment to how it was originally written, since it's no-ones place to edit other people's talk page comments. Clearly not vandalism, then. I hope that's made it clear. Thanks. Maccy69 (talk) 21:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pope Benedict XVII

Speedy deletion nomination of Pope Benedict XVII

A tag has been placed on Pope Benedict XVII, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

there isn't redir to the Queen named Elisabeth III- What I want to say is: The lemma is completely wrong.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Atlan da Gonozal (talk) 21:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Pope Benedict XVII

Hello Hektor, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Pope Benedict XVII - a page you tagged - because: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:07, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pope Benedict XVII

The article Pope Benedict XVII has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no Pope Benedict XVII, so a redirect from that name is inappropriate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:08, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Pond

Please reply to the comment I've left you at this AFD. Thanks, WossOccurring (talk) 18:41, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And again. WossOccurring (talk) 18:42, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Benedict XVII

RfD nomination of Pope Benedict XVII

1992 Winter Olympics

Thank you for pointing out that the Paralympics are not Olympics. I have gone back through other places where I knew I had done the same thing, and corrected them. I am going to be creating a template for these "Olympic games held in <country>" items and going through all the games again, so I should catch any remaining errors of this type when I do that.Donlammers (talk) 12:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Hektor! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 31 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Annabel Reid - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chantal Jouanno - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hein Verbruggen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Cédric Burdet - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Daouda Karaboué - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Christophe Kempe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Laëtitia Le Corguillé - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Henri Sérandour - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hubert Falco - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alain Joyandet - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. Laurent Wauquiez

12. Alain Marleix

13. Luc Chatel

14. Henri de Castries

15. Martin Hirsch

16. François Baroin

17. Lee So-yeon (judoka)

18. Rachel Legrain-Trapani

19. Yvonne Cagle

20. Antoine Rufenacht

21. Marianne Merchez

22. Muhammad A-Sabah A-Salim A-Sabah

23. Jacqueline de Guillenchmidt

24. Dominique Schnapper

25. Pierre Steinmetz

26. Jean-Louis Pezant

27. Pierre Joxe

28. Olivier Dutheillet de Lamothe

29. Jean-Claude Colliard

30. Christian Jacob (French politician)

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of fictional vehicles

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of fictional vehicles. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional vehicles (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Barack Obama Presidential Library

NO REFERENCES

Stop adding information about the Doctor Who titles. Until the magazines are actually released we can not confirm and you still have no references or sources that link off to any where. -- Mister Mystery (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DWM #418 seems a correct reference to me. Using capital letters is rude. Please cool down. Hektor (talk) 16:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you are the one who needs to cool down

Unfounded accusations are not the way to go. First, if you read the 3RR rules Mister Mystery is not in violation as the first change is counted as an edit not a revert. Second, your warning, talk page discussion and report to edit warring did not come until after their last edit to the page in question. Next DWM has been wrong about titles in the past. Titles and air dates can and have changed right up to the broadcast of the next series. The directors and writers comes from other sources than just DWM. MM is obviously a newish user. They have reacted to the message left on their talk page by Edgepedia by protecting the page in question from rumors.

Your accusations of sock puppetry. Please feel free to file a report on this at the appropriate spot. The admins will find no connection between MM and myself except that we both edit on WikiP.MarnetteD | Talk 16:40, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New info - I have just seen that the DWM is being sourced properly in a couple of places for the titles that you are using. Thus I want to send my apologies for changing your edits that were based on it. Be aware that they may still change but it looks likely that we are well on the way to enjoying the new season later this year. MarnetteD | Talk 17:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't apologize. I was happy to have received my copy of the new DWM and discovering this interesting information in it. I will refrain from editing Doctor Who articles in the future. It seems to me that the skin of the Doctor Who fanbase is a bit too thin. No harm done anyway. Hektor (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Eleventh Hour (Doctor Who)

I have nominated The Eleventh Hour (Doctor Who), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Eleventh Hour (Doctor Who). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sceptre ^(talk) 06:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marie-Laure Brunet

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Marie-Laure Brunet. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Déborah Anthonioz

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Déborah Anthonioz. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whomanfoursays.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whomanfoursays.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 12:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]