User talk:HansTheExplorer

Welcome!

Hello, HansTheExplorer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Diary of a Wimpy Kid did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. StephenMacky1 (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite new to editing on Wikipedia. HansTheExplorer (talk) 11:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC) Can you give me a guide? HansTheExplorer (talk) 11:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should check this guide. It has all of the necessary information for starting out. I've already linked you several other guides and tutorials above as well. If you want other guides on Wikipedia, you can find plenty on the internet too. You are always welcome to reach out if you need any help. StephenMacky1 (talk) 12:56, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Duonaut. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Duonaut^{(talk | contribs)} 07:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now, which website was it? HansTheExplorer (talk) 11:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Earl's Court tube station, you may be blocked from editing. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was a joke. I did it because of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Borough. So I HAD to vandalize the station page with random jokes. This train terminates at Barons Court. HansTheExplorer (talk) 05:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i think... maybe. HansTheExplorer (talk) 03:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

but not sure HansTheExplorer (talk) 03:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sure* HansTheExplorer (talk) 03:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April fools HansTheExplorer (talk) 03:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was just an April Fools prank that I did. HansTheExplorer (talk) 17:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hold up it couldn’t have been April Fools as I did it in March. HansTheExplorer (talk) 10:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at British Rail Class 43 (HST). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want me to stop editing like this go and add Stepford County Railway to list of Roblox games. HansTheExplorer (talk) 11:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry, what? I’m not your puppet. It is your responsibility to make edits you want to have made. Danners430 (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok (Redacted) Also I'might not be able to know which category to put SCR in. HansTheExplorer (talk) 11:41, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:HansTheExplorer

A tag has been placed on User:HansTheExplorer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Obvious U5 hosting information on a Roblox game, but also G11 spamming own youtube channel. Plus look at the user's threatening comments and you'll conclude WP:NOTHERE

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I won't do it again. I was just joking and I'm not going to do it on the Class 68 page. HansTheExplorer (talk) 22:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HansTheExplorer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Do you think I’m a grownup or something? I was doing a little joke and I just really wanted SCR to be on the list of Roblox games because I really like SCR. I would not do it on the next page to be on the list which would be the British Rail Class 68. I am just doing it on the HST for fun. I know the sandbox exists, and I also know it’s November. Also when did I promote my channel on places except my user page? Plus, it’s a user page, not an article... Ugh... This is trifficult (I like Bluey to remind you why I use “trifficult” instead of “difficult”.) Please unblock me, also I’m not edit warring, I did one revert (technically redirect Buramsan station to Danggogae station and then after that redirect Danggogae station to Buramsan station. We know.) HansTheExplorer (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You just explained why this unblock request cannot be granted. Drmies (talk) 22:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Second unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HansTheExplorer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First off, I’ve noticed someone said I am doing “childish behaviour”. I am (redacted) and you should understand. Also, don’t you know to assume good faith? See WP:AGF because you should know about your own wiki. What? Is Wikipedia 13+, 15+, or 19+? Do you hate kids? I am NOT a GROWNUP. Additionally, USER PAGES should not be just (in summary) This user is a Wikipedia editor and barely does anything else. It should be used to express the user! Otherwise user pages on Wikipedia just look like a generic Wikipedia article and everyone will think it was just a generic page instead of a user page. That is not what a user page is meant to be. If you want to do that, there’s no need for user pages - just delete them. Unless everyone who edits Wikipedia suddenly drops every interest they have except for editing Wikipedia. Which would be nonsense and I do not want to be blocked. Please give my user page back and please unblock me. I understand what I have been blocked for and I am sorry. The Sign ed, HansTheExplorer (talk) 06:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Stop posting personal information about yourself in this very public place. See WP:YOUNG and read it with your parent/guardian/custodian. See WP:USERPAGE for information on what is acceptable user page content. You frankly seem to lack the maturity needed to participate here. There are children capable of participating here, but you haven't demonstrated that you can. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Third unblock request and second unblock request redaction info

It’s confidential. Also I’m not a grown-up. Anyways, enough about that. Let’s get into unblock request number 3:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HansTheExplorer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have an idea. Make it so that user pages can now express the user, but in a separate (collapsible if necessary) section, with stuff about contributions to Wikipedia on top. And I was expressing myself, but I didn't have many notable Wikipedia contributions that I thought of as such to add onto my page, so it was just me expressing myself. I think if Wikipedia articles are going to be about their Wikipedia contributions mostly, it would just sound like the user’s main interest is editing Wikipedia. I don’t edit Wikipedia often, and when I do, it’s minor edits. The Sign -ed, HansTheExplorer (talk) 07:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is now the third unblock request you've wasted. You don't have an infinite number of them. Expect your next one to be your last one, you'll likely have talk page access revoked if it doesn't meaningfully address the block. Yamla (talk) 12:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.