User talk:HaithamSelim

Welcome!

Hello, HaithamSelim, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Khaled Abo Bakr, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khaled Abo Bakr

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khaled Abo Bakr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 17:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haya Ibrahim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haya Ibrahim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haya Ibrahim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:15, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahmed Abou Hashima

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ahmed Abou Hashima, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 16:43, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Usama Tolba

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Usama Tolba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CataracticPlanets (talk) 02:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 10:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HaithamSelim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize if there is any promotion but I was trying to fix the article better and updated information I apologize again for this mistake HaithamSelim (talk) 13:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To be frank, Seraphimblade was much kinder than I would have been, and gave you a lot of chances. You'll need to explain what you intend to edit in the future, if you have any conflicts of interest, and whether or not you have been paid to edit before an unblock will be considered. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HaithamSelim, the issue is that you were already given many, many chances to stop what you were doing without resorting to a block. For example, you made the following edit to Haifa Wehbe [1], which contained material such as "she has released 5 hit albums", "Furthermore, her hit collaboration with International French DJ David Vendetta", "Most recently, Haifa released a hit single in English" (leave out unneeded adjectives like "hit", and "Webhe", not "Haifa"), "The VEVO clip featuring acclaimed choreographer", "Due to her acclaimed performances (again, leave out unneeded fluff like "acclaimed"), "She has captivated the world", "Throughout her professional career, Haifa has built a strong, loyal and large 7-digit fan base worldwide. Her personality, beauty, fashion sense and style have made her an Icon and influencer for her followers and the center of attention for international media and others within the industries of music and film production." (if you didn't realize those were promotional, I don't know what to tell you). You then deceptively marked this edit as "minor" and characterized it as "repair" in the edit summary, when you were actually pretty much replacing the entire article with this puff piece. Above, you have been told many times to stop promotional editing (as well as engaging in other misconduct such as copyright violation), but have persisted. So, is there a good reason I should consider unblocking you now, when you persisted in this behavior despite repeated warnings before? Also, before we proceed further, please answer with a clear "yes" or "no" if you are being paid or compensated to edit Wikipedia, including being asked or expected to do so as a duty of employment or internship. If that is true, you would need to agree to make the required disclosures. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And while we're at it, could you please explain this nonsensical move you made, that frankly appeared to be vandalism? [2] Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 16:30, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]