User talk:HMGelani

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Umar Ata Bandial, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sajjad Jani (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sajjad Jani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for the review. You have mentioned the reason of declining that the subject of this article already exits but I checked that the mentioned article was directly created a week ago, while I had submitted my detailed draft two months ago. HMGelani (talk) 15:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon Thanks for your comment. I would appreciate if you please look into history of the article you mentioned. That article was created two months after I submitted my draft and the first version of that article shows that my draft was completely copied and pasted there. All the data was copied from my draft and few changes were done later, after publishing it as an article; while my draft was declined because this article with same subject existed in main space. HMGelani (talk) 15:46, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, HMGelani! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

User:HMGelani - I have compared the article and the draft. I see that your draft preceded the article by about two months. The wording of the article is not a copy or close paraphrase of the wording of your draft, and so the article is not a copy-paste. It is true that the article used the same sources as you did. I considered requesting a history merge, and have concluded that the difference in the wording of the stub is enough so that a history merge is not required. What I suggest is that you copy the added content of your draft into the article, with your additional sources, so that most of the content in the article will be credited to you. I will ask another editor to take a look and see if they agree or disagree. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for considering. I was happy to merge, as suggested by you. But I came to know that the oldest version here of the article Sajjad Jani had a lot of resemblance with the draft and all the sources retrieved by myself for draft (before the date of article publishing) were mentioned in it. The current version got many changes but looking at the oldest version, I thought to highlight it. HMGelani (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Sajjad Jani moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sajjad Jani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Sajjad Jani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sajjad Jani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajjad Jani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Saqib (talk) 16:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

@Rosguill @DoctorOfData HMGelani (talk) 10:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Sajjad Jani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sajjad Jani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajjad Jani (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 12:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, HMGelani. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Sajjad Jani, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Star Mississippi 12:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)