User talk:Guy1890/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Guy1890. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Social Security (United States), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gwernol 23:58, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Hand-coding
Hey all :).
I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).
You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyes
wikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).
If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:22, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Earthquake weather (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Precipitation
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Forgotten war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Guy1890. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Masjid As-Salafi, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Wikipedical (talk) 07:55, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject Red Link Recovery
Howdy, and welcome to the project.
We're going through a quieter phase right now and have (as far as I can tell) fewer than 30 active members. There's still lots to do though; the most active general tasks seem to be Red Link Recovery Live and and Unlikely Links. If there's a particular subject area you're interested in, let me know and I'll generate some reports relevant to it for you. - TB (talk) 08:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I see that you are involved in "Red Link Recovery" which I didn't know to exist before. Please do not un-red-link names of people whose notability is assured and implied (like New York assemblymen) as you did on this page: 89th New York State Legislature. The red links are needed to respond to the "What links here" function when searching for previous tenures, and maintaining a uniform spelling of these people's names, as well as to disambiguate them from people with similar names. Kraxler (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- I got rid of those links because they were apparently, somehow interfering with the Dablink bot. Plus, I'm pretty sure that no one cares about NY state assemblymen from the 1800s. If they were famous enough, they'd have Wikipedia pages by now. Guy1890 (talk) 17:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thank you
Thank you for fixing my footnote on Ray's Pizza! — Robert Greer (talk) 00:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I try & patrol the "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pages_with_missing_references_list" every now & again, and I hope that I'm doing most of those needed edits properly. They are usually pretty easy to fix. Guy1890 (talk) 00:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for that heads up. I've reported him to AIV. Hopefully they'll see fit to block him. KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ... 12:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abenaki mythology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fletcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Adding missing reference lists
Thank you for getting stuck into Category:Pages with missing references list! A better fix for some of these pages may be to look in the page history and simply undo the effect of a bad edit or two. Have a look at the recent history of File:Subscript superscript examples.png, Category:20th-century economists and Hydraulic action. -- John of Reading (talk) 22:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanx...I'm doing the best that I can. Some of the pages that have reference errors are still beyond me at this point though. Guy1890 (talk) 22:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Feel free to post examples on my talk page, and I'll see if I can spot the problems. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:26, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanx...I'm doing the best that I can. Some of the pages that have reference errors are still beyond me at this point though. Guy1890 (talk) 22:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- OK, will do from here on out. Thanx! Guy1890 (talk) 07:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- John of Reading (talk) 21:36, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for cleaning up Camila (telenovela). I did wonder if it really needs links for grandfather, village, love, married, spoiled, poverty, pregnant, affection, and theft. These seem to be "everyday words understood by most readers in context", as defined by Wikipedia:OVERLINK. Anyway, thanks, and feel free to remove any of those extra links if you agree! - Ttwaring (talk) 15:44, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Fixed some errors that, I think, were there before I started editing this page, but the rest of these links were intentional. Guy1890 (talk) 21:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Hong Kong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Not sure what I was exactly up to on this above page. I vaguely remember being perplexed at where some of the disambiguation links were supposed to go there. Guy1890 (talk) 01:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Tia Ling for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tia Ling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tia Ling (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 06:06, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. I have moved Regions of Latvia and Duke of Alburquerque back to the unfinished list on the disambig count. Links appearing to be "justified" is an improper reason for removing these, as intentional links must still be piped per WP:INTDABLINK, while these pages still show direct links, and therefore will continue to be read as errors by the system until these links are piped as required. Cheers! bd2412 T 03:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- This doesn't appear to be a big deal to me, since both of the articles in question have been "tagged as WP:DABCONCEPT." I just didn't want people wasting their time trying to disambiguate terms on the list that really can't be moved around at this point. I completely agree that the two above terms should have their respective articles converted to broad-concept articles. Guy1890 (talk) 08:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Being tagged as WP:DABCONCEPT and being changed into concept articles are two different things. As it stands, the links to these articles will continue to show up as errors to the bots that populate the lists of ambiguous links. bd2412 T 04:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- This doesn't appear to be a big deal to me, since both of the articles in question have been "tagged as WP:DABCONCEPT." I just didn't want people wasting their time trying to disambiguate terms on the list that really can't be moved around at this point. I completely agree that the two above terms should have their respective articles converted to broad-concept articles. Guy1890 (talk) 08:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback deployment
Hey Guy1890; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Lightning page revisions
Hello, I see you had interest in this page recently, so I wanted to invite you to take part in the major overhaul I have been working on. Thanks for your interest.
In reading over your user page, I see you were/are a meteorologist, which is a great thing. As you will see, I have done a lot of needed work to the page, and although there may be some minor discrepancies [within the areas I have focused/revised/wrote/edited], I believe you will find it to be a best attempt effort to be as factual as we currently understand lightning. I think you may be influential in providing references, links & sources to back what is written. Original content... maybe. However, this topic is too complex to simply pull lines from the sources throw them in where needed, and end up with an article that is both comprehensible and readable. I look forward to your input. Borealdreams (talk) 00:29, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- I am still a meteorologist. I've been watching the page in question & more of your edits today (March 15th), and I can't find anything that you've done so far today that I disagree with. The Lightning page is on my list of pages to revise and extend in the near future, but I've been pulled in a few too many directions recently to focus on many meteorology-related pages on Wikipedia very recently...maybe by next month. All I can promise right now is to move up my timetable for editing the page in question. Lightning is not my forte in weather per say, and I've never been a fan of the theories behind lightning formation...but there is likely some info (including more recent science) that can be added to that page. As long as you don't remove much in the way of previously well-cited & scientifically-based material from the Lightning page, you won't run into much trouble from me. Good luck... Guy1890 (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks much
Thank you for your Merge suggestion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filly Films, I agree and I've responded there. — Cirt (talk) 23:18, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I'm personally not a fan of many of the recent deletions from Wikipedia, but there does not appear to be a consensus on improving (instead of deleting) many pages that are up for deletion. I have had some limited success so far with getting some info from destined to be deleted pages merged into other pages. Good luck... Guy1890 (talk) 00:48, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of pornographic sub-genres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sexual act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
- I did this intentionally given the context of the article. Guy1890 (talk) 21:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Resilient Barnstar | |
| Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 22:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC) |
I am mainly awarding you this barnstar for this comment. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 22:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanx. What is up with that line of rhetoric from Mr. Wolfowitz? Has anyone ever provided any evidence for those kind of claims? I keep seeing these kind of comments about adult awards here & there, but I've never personally seen any evidence to support them. Guy1890 (talk) 22:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- No idea what his problem is. Hopefully this shuts him up, but if not, I'll have no choice but to open up an RfC. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 07:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanx. What is up with that line of rhetoric from Mr. Wolfowitz? Has anyone ever provided any evidence for those kind of claims? I keep seeing these kind of comments about adult awards here & there, but I've never personally seen any evidence to support them. Guy1890 (talk) 22:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Reply
I really appreciate your help, but yes, I speedied the article. I know that was unexpected, but upon further reflection, I would really prefer to not be involved in creating or editing an article on that topic at this time. Of course, there is nothing preventing anybody else from doing so. If you like, I would be willing to send you a list of the sources I used. --Geniac (talk) 03:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- That's not necessary. For the record, I really wouldn't worry about any adult article PRODs from someone like Mr. Wolfowitz in the future. He PRODs those kind of articles almost as much as he breathes in and out. ;) Guy1890 (talk) 03:48, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
April 2013
Hello, I'm Curb Chain. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Chain (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- I re-added the info that I originally added to the article List of speed metal bands before. Within the article in question, the citation enclosed says "Please only add bands with articles to this list. New additions without articles will be deleted." It doesn't say that each item on the list needs a citation, and many lists don't have citations for every name on the list. Guy1890 (talk) 21:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Those lists should. If the artists you have have references on their own article, you can use them for the list-article.Curb Chain (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- I understand that, but the article itself doesn't state that in order to be on this particular list that you need to have a reference for them as well as a Wikipedia page. If that's the standard that this page is operating under, then it should state that on the page, which is something that I've occasionally seen other lists do. It doesn't really matter to me. Guy1890 (talk) 01:06, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- That is a hidden comment and an aid to editors. Even for this article this is the exception, and not the norm, that these hidden comments exist.Curb Chain (talk) 02:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- I also find what you did quite pointy.Curb Chain (talk) 17:43, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- I understand that, but the article itself doesn't state that in order to be on this particular list that you need to have a reference for them as well as a Wikipedia page. If that's the standard that this page is operating under, then it should state that on the page, which is something that I've occasionally seen other lists do. It doesn't really matter to me. Guy1890 (talk) 01:06, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- So, you've been basically "protecting" a listing of heavy (speed) metal bands for over a year now in a genre that you think is basically the same as another genre of music? Please...this issue is now closed. Stop commenting on my talk page. Guy1890 (talk) 20:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Well, you've got a lot of nerve threatening me with a potential block given your long history here on Wikipedia Mr. Wofowitz. Your intimidation tactics are not welcome here on this page.
- Please kindly self-revert your very recent edits to the following pages: Karina Kay, Jayna Oso, Lea Lexis, Nessa Devil and Katie Kox. The links that you (twice) recently removed from those articles are a part of the list of valid External Links from the Wikipedia Pornography Project, of which I note that you are not even a member of. See: "AdultWhich aka WhichPornstar – Database listing website appearances of European and other adult models. Includes an number of models not found on Eurobabe Index. Their filmographies are considered reliable", "Excaliburfilms.com – Many performer and director biographies", and "Eurobabe Index – Database listing website appearances (and sometimes filmographies) of European adult models. Includes a number of models not found on AdultWhich. Part of the {{female adult bio}} box template. Their filmographies are considered reliable".
- I will go further to say that your well-known crusade against pornography-related articles is unwelcome here on Wikipedia. I welcome any further input from an uninvolved administrator on this issue, since it may likely result in you being blocked Mr. Wolfowitz. We could do with a break from your "I don't like it" attitude on here. All your doing here is making more work for the rest of us with your constant deletionist tone.
- In my five years on Wikipedia, I've never been blocked, but I note that you have been blocked twice for disruptive editing & editing warring in the past. I have not engaged in either activity, nor do I have any interest in doing so now or in the future. Guy1890 (talk) 02:07, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Mytwocents, I would avoid Excaliburfilms.com, it is a web-shop site, so its presence in EL might sound promotional or at best inopportune. Eurobabe Index and AdultWhich are two reliable database sites, so they could stay. If I could point something, for the cases I checked, AdultWhich appears to be very, very incomplete, so its removal does not appear as a serious lack in terms of informations (that does not mean it should be marked as spam). Cavarrone (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- From what I can tell from his history here, this wouldn't be the first time that Mr. Wolfowitz has tried to enforce some phantom Wikipedia "rule" that doesn't exist. I really don't know what bee is in his bonnet now, or why he chose to troll through some of my recent edits to revert a bunch of non-controversial external links for just a handful of articles.
- In the searching that I've done so far, not all adult actors have "Excaliburfilms" entries or entries there that had any useful information on it, so I haven't always added an External Link to that site on every porn actor article that I've edited. The same thing goes for "AdultWhich", not all adult actors have existing or useful entries there. It's certainly not true that I've been "spamming" multiple articles with entries for these sites for some personal monetary gain. I've also not tried to use any of the above sites for citations in any article on Wikipedia. Guy1890 (talk) 20:07, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Still waiting for those self-reverts User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. You're not going to weasel your way out of this. Those legitimate links belong back in those articles. Guy1890 (talk) 20:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- So, it's been over a week, and Mr. Wolfowitz continues to happily edit away while ignoring this discussion (as I unfortunately expected). Fair warning, I guess I'll have to slowly start to re-introduce the necessary links back into many of the above articles. Guy1890 (talk) 23:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this unnecessary saga continues. When I tried to make some minor edits to Nessa Devil (like moving some links around) and re-added some non-controversial links along with a link to this very discussion (which Mr. Wolfowitz continues to ignore), he reverted those edits again and made an unfounded accusation by saying in his edit summary "remove advertising links added back with deceptive edit summary". There was nothing "deceptive" about my edit summary and the links in question aren't "advertising links". Unfortunately, this kind of activity has been going on with Mr. Wolfowitz for apparently a number of years without much of any correction...more on that later after I do some more reading. Guy1890 (talk) 00:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- So, it's been over a week, and Mr. Wolfowitz continues to happily edit away while ignoring this discussion (as I unfortunately expected). Fair warning, I guess I'll have to slowly start to re-introduce the necessary links back into many of the above articles. Guy1890 (talk) 23:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Still waiting for those self-reverts User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. You're not going to weasel your way out of this. Those legitimate links belong back in those articles. Guy1890 (talk) 20:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- In the searching that I've done so far, not all adult actors have "Excaliburfilms" entries or entries there that had any useful information on it, so I haven't always added an External Link to that site on every porn actor article that I've edited. The same thing goes for "AdultWhich", not all adult actors have existing or useful entries there. It's certainly not true that I've been "spamming" multiple articles with entries for these sites for some personal monetary gain. I've also not tried to use any of the above sites for citations in any article on Wikipedia. Guy1890 (talk) 20:07, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Censor bars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blurring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
- Fixed. Guy1890 (talk) 19:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
-- SuggestBot (talk) 23:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.