User talk:Borealdreams
Pages I'm working on to improve & get in agreement
[edit]
Message added 01:29, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lightning Eliminators & Consultants, Inc..
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Don't let it get you down.
[edit]Hengistmate,
I've removed this discussion, points noted, as I'm more interested (see below discussion) in moving forward than engaging in a pissing match that goes no where.
Regards, Borealdreams (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Not slinging mud, just acknowledging a reality... The-Undue-Weight-of-Truth-on [Wikipedia] Borealdreams (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
removed comments not needed regarding above Borealdreams (talk) 03:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
ahh, I get it now ... you claiming I have a CoI, am "edit warring" and posting "fringe" subjects is just your way of saying you are right without having to defend yourself. Got it! Now quit bothering me. Borealdreams (talk) 03:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
March, 2012
[edit]
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Lightning rod. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 07:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
[removed condescending comments & allegations of my wrongdoing by Guy Macon] Borealdreams (talk) 03:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
No you're absolutely right Guy, I have more interest in being neutral than you do. Instead of battling me on something you have no viable/credible/working knowledge in, why haven't you worked towards making necessary changes I've requested in the area you do have knowledge of... Surge Protection? Loose the condescending tone with me, or go away as I'm tired of your obvious bs. Borealdreams (talk)
ANI
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Brewing problem. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Question about your mentioning of a magnetic field increasing point discharge
[edit]In the Lightning Rod article, you made a change, where you indicate, that the point discharge is stronger, the stronger the magnetic field is. Also on the talk page of the same article you mention this:
"any point in a magnetic field will cause ionization to occur proportional to the strength of the magnetic field"
I would be very grateful to you, if you could explain, why a magnetic field does have such an effect on a point discharge. Up until now, I always thought only the electric field strength is responsible for the strength of the discharge. Or you could indicate some source which describes this effect. Thank you. World-shanti (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- You make a valid point. It's probably more semantics than anything else. Whether to use "electric", "electro-magnetic" or "magnetic", they are all referring to the same thing, but probably "electric" is the best to use.
- Interesting that of all the changes I made in the LR page, this would be the only comment about any. But, aye, the page has become so convoluted, it barely qualifies as a valid encyclopedic article anymore. It'd be nice if it just vanished into the ether. Borealdreams (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Lightning rod redirects
[edit]Hey there. I closed your redirect for discussion section as that is not the proper location. You have an ongoing content issue/dispute, which should be discussed on talkpages and made through consensus, not through edits such as this. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lightning Eliminators & Consultants, Inc., a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Lightning Eliminators & Consultants, Inc.
[edit]
Hello Borealdreams. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Lightning Eliminators & Consultants, Inc..
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lightning Eliminators & Consultants, Inc.}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)