User talk:Guramrit27

Welcome!

Hello, Guramrit27, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Random pages test, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Largoplazo (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Random pages test

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Random pages test, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Largoplazo (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Schmidt. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Eric Schmidt was changed by Guramrit27 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956874 on 2017-04-20T01:06:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Hailee Steinfeld.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
Please read encyclopedic policy on external links, particularly what is considered "link spam".

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —ATS 🖖 talk 17:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Hailee Steinfeld. —ATS 🖖 talk 17:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Guramrit27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to start with an apology, I am new member of wikipedia community so I am not well versed with the community guidelines for wikipedia. I understand I may have made multiple disruptive page edit requests but I was testing the mediawiki API to edit the Page. I wanted to put a link for a collection to the interviews for Hailee Steinfeld on her wiki page. but for some reason I was finding it a bit confusing to reference to external Links. Since in mediawiki API I can not reference the Page section by its name but have to use the Section Number and then have to decide whether to append or prepend the link to the section. So because of these multiple combinations I may have disrupted the page, and If you can see my requests you will concur with me that I was just Trying to position the Link in External Links section. I totally Understand that I may have caused some Disruption but that was not the intention, and I Didn't saw the warning messages I got from the Admin as I am new to this so I was unaware of these messages. But I can assure you that I understand that my actions may have caused this disruption and will make sure moving forward this will not happen and will test my requests on my sandbox page before editing a public wikipedia page. I would really appreciate if you can unblock me from editing the wikipedia pages. Thanks

Decline reason:

So as a new member of the community your first step was using the API to do things you didn't proofread? And even if we ignore where you put the link, that doesn't address the nature of the link, which was inappropriate as well. Huon (talk) 01:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not an admin, but I would be disinclined. Even if you didn't see the messages on your talk, the edit summaries as you were reverted (particularly here and here, pointing you to the reason for the reversions) were not heeded; indeed, you kept putting the link back.

Were it up to me, I would require that you read our policy on external links (with particular emphasis on "link spam") and our policy on edit-warring, and then come back here to your talk page and explain your understanding of them—and specifically why the site you kept adding is not valid for our purposes. —ATS 🖖 talk 20:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]