User talk:Gryffindor/Archive14

Vandalism

Pax tecum. May I know why exactly you are vandalising (or so that in which it appear so) the Emperor's article?

Kaiserlicher Ritter (talk) 03:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Gryffindor! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Twelve_Symbols_national_emblem

Hi Gryffindor, thank you and a Happy New Year to you too! I'm much grateful for Sodacan's efforts. However in my own opinion there could be a few more tweaks for the historical/cultural accuracy. I would look into it and provide some suggestions when I got some time. --Ericmetro (talk) 16:52, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gryffindor, sorry for this belated reply. I wish that I could create a coloring sample with graphic historical sources for reference, unfortunately I'm quite busy in real life these days. I wish I could be back soon. --Ericmetro (talk) 14:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Imperial Family

Hello. You moved the pages of the Japanese Imperial Family without any discussion. As an administrator it was better to a start a discussion on the talk page. Your reason for changing the titles was the official website of Imperial Household Agency, because it refers to them like this: HIH Prince/ss X. Well on Wikipedia the royal family members' articles are titled like this: "Name, Prince of X". British royal family's website also refers to them by their titles like HRH The Prince of Wales but on Wikipedia his article's title is Charles, Prince of Wales. Most of the articles of royal families are titled like this, so it is a kind of rule. Even Japanese Wikipedia includes the names of their royals on its articles' titles. So please move these pages to their previous titles. Thanks. Keivan.f^Talk 19:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To make it clear Aiko, Princess Toshi is a good title because it combines her name with her title of Princess Toshi. The same goes for the rest of the family who have titles. Prince William is the "Duke of Cambridge" but his name is combined with his title.--Hipposcrashed (talk) 16:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emirates

Hiya

You've moved Sharjah to Emirate of Sharjah and Ajman to Emirate of Ajman. It might have been nice to have a talk about such a big move before performing it. Both Emirates form part of the seven-emirate Federation, The United Arab Emirates. Each of the seven emirates (including Abu Dhabi and Dubai) are referred to exclusively (in roadsigns, maps, text, websites, government statute, legal documents, news media) by their names - Dubai, Sharjah etc. and never as Emirate of Dubai or Emirate of Sharjah. Although they ARE Emirates (although, perhaps perversely none have an Emir, the ruler is referred to simply as the Ruler), they are not called Emirates.

Any chance you'd consider undoing it?

BTW, I called Sharjah Fort 'Sharjah Fort (Al Hisn Sharjah)' because that is the formal title of the fort, applied locally. It's called, by the local government authorities responsible for it, 'Al Hisn Sharjah Fort', which would make the article unsearchable for the average English user, hence the choice to use its English title but include the Arabic version too. If that makes any sense! :)

http://www.sdci.gov.ae/english/sharjahfort.html

Korso

Hello,

In this edit almost eight and a half years ago, you wrote that the Grand Hotel, Vienna was centrally located for the Korso. Now I just translated the article fi:Korso to English as Korso and came across the article about the hotel. Vantaa is a bit far away from Vienna so I don't think you meant the district. I changed the link to Korso (restaurant), because all I found by Googling for "Korso Vienna" was a famous restaurant called Korso an der Oper. Was this what you meant? JIP | Talk 19:21, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this silliness...

It's not a personal insult that the two pictures of yours are not as well suited as the two pictures of mine. It's simply harder to see when there are patches of very dark and very light in the same photo. Edit warring over this is getting nowhere. If you'd like, start an RfC on the article talk pages, display the alternate images, ask the question neutrally, and see what the consensus is. BMK (talk) 01:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I set up RfCs myself on both articles. We'll see what happens. BMK (talk) 03:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parthenon gif

Hello, Gryffindor. Greetings from the Photography workshop. A reply has been made to your request. You may view the reply here.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Photography reply}} template.

Fallschirmjäger ✉ 14:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Have nominated {{Country data Mughal Empire}} for deletion. Informing you given that you requested the creation the image that is the subject of discussion. I suspect that your interests in the topic are related purely to the graphics, rather than the history. If so, feel free to ping any user you believe to be the originator of the underlying flag design. Abecedare (talk) 19:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Nielsen

Thanks for your interest in the article, Gryffindor. Sorry about the reverts of Biography/Life. I have now had time to go through the biographies of the other FA composers and see that while most of the recent ones have a Life section, you are indeed correct that several others have a section headed Biography. I think that within a "biography" it is probably more logical to have a Life section. Maybe we can keep it like that for the rest of the TFA day and rediscuss on the talk page? We have been spending most of our time reverting vandalism. Your edit was much more in keeping with seasoned experience. Hope this doesn't upset you too much.--Ipigott (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Osotspa

I'm wondering why you reverted my deletion of essentially unreferenced material at the above article. The only reference is to the company's own website, which is not a reliable source. Thus it is my understanding that anybody can remove this unreference material. That should be the end of it, but if you want to find independent references, please go ahead and add them and put most of the material back.

I say "most", but actually it almost all looks like advertising to me, so maybe you should check whether it is straightfordward unbiased info first. In any case with two rock solid reasons to delete the material, I'll revert you.

All the best. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 03:25, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gryffindor, to explain a bit. There has been a bunch of paid editing on the Osotspa and related articles, so it is being watched pretty closely for promotional editing. Badly sourced or unsourced content, and promotional language, are not going to stand. I hope that makes sense. Jytdog (talk) 03:33, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feuerwehrmann listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feuerwehrmann. Since you had some involvement with the Feuerwehrmann redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eisuke Tachikawa

The article Eisuke Tachikawa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 09:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salam al-Bey

Hi. User:Tounsimentounes had the right intent when he moved the page to "Salam el-Bey". The title here is a genitive phrase (Hymn of the Bey) as opposed to As-Salam al-Malaki al-Urduni which is a noun followed by two adjectives. However, the title should be Salam al-Bey with al- instead of el-, since that is the standard transliteration. Cheers Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 00:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Nancy, France

Hello, I'm M2545. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Timeline of Nancy, France without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

History of Nancy

You created the new article History of Nancy on 22 January, but so far have not add much of substance (except for moving the entirety of the pre-existing article Timeline of Nancy, France). I would recommend you return the Timeline of Nancy, France to its previous state as its own article, and continue working on the separate history article. Timeline articles are lists, and history articles are prose essays. Thank you for your cooperation. -- M2545 (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to our April event

You are invited...

Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon

Hosts: Women in Red, Women writers

April 2016
#wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Datok Keramat listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Datok Keramat. Since you had some involvement with the Datok Keramat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 08:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Celestinesucess. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Echizen ware, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Celestinesucess (talk) 08:50, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Echizen ware

Hello, Gryffindor,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Echizen ware should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echizen ware .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Celestinesucess (talk) 08:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Please do not delete AfD tags until the debate is finished. Coderzombie (talk) 09:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is a discussion at ANI regarding your involvement with the Coat of arms template. Regards, Only in death does duty end (talk) 12:39, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

9th Jebtsundamba Khutughtu

Dear Gryffindor, When you created this article, you wrote "He was born as Jampal Namdol Chökyi Gyaltsen on the tenth day of the eleventh month of 1932 near the Jokhang Temple in Lhasa, Tibet."

With ref "Central Asiatic Journal, XLV:2, 2001, "The Life and Lineage of the Ninth Khalkha Jetsun Dampa Khutukhtu of Urga" by Fabian Sanders, pp. 293-303. " I was wondering if this mean 10 november 1932, or correspond to tenth day of the eleventh month of a Tibetan year. If it correspond to a Tibetan year, it may be important to specify which one. Thanks Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I do not know either. I suppose this is in the reference you used : ( http://www.jstor.org/stable/41928266 ). --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 17:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page 293, it is correct, water monkey year. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 08:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anna Christina Radziwill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Christina Radziwill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Christina Radziwill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ✉cookiemonster✉ ^𝚨755𝛀 19:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cliff Lee

The current (recent?) MLB player is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Cliff Lee", over the potter and other baseball player. I've asked your move be reverted. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Title and first line of a couple articles

Please come participate in these two discussions:

Thanks! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring. Your latest edit is pushing toward WP:3RR. As an administrator, you should definitely be aware of such things. Stick to the discussions above so a consensus can be found. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

I know WP:Don't template the regulars but,

Your recent editing history at Emperor of Japan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 11:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arita ware

Care to give any REASON before reverting me? Johnbod (talk) 21:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey)

Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in setting up Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey), based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). Now it's not a contest in itself, it's designed to motivate people to inspire others to improve content and build something which demonstrates the hard work going into the country which is visible. The focus is more on quality improvements but new articles are welcome too. Eventually a Turkish National Contest could be created to fuel it, like Wikipedia:Awaken the Dragon, in which contestants can choose to keep the Amazon vouchers themselves to buy their own books for more articles or put them into book fund to help editors further improve Turkish-related topics by giving them the books they want. It will begin though as purely an improvement drive. If interested, or you think anybody else might be interested, alert them and sign up on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey talk page at the bottom. Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

French proper names and italics

I noticed you italicized the title of the Wikipedia page Menus-Plaisirs du Roi. In the article Maison du Roi in The Dictionary of Art, the names Maison du Roi and Menus Plaisirs du Roi are not italicized. In fact, it is uncommon to italicize French proper names like this in English-languare sources. One can usually distinguish between French terms that should be italicized, such as hôtel particulier and a French proper name, since in most mainstream English-language sources the latter is capitalized as though it were an English proper name. It is rare to find an English-language source that both capitalizes and italicizes French proper names. So the same is true for the article Maison du Roi. Italics should not be used for either of these article titles. --Robert.Allen (talk) 21:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We should follow the practice found in mainstream English sources, not a Wikipedia editor's unsubstantiated opinion. --Robert.Allen (talk) 06:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Gryffindor. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Municipalities of Trentino, German names

Ciao I saw your page about Municipalities of Trentino, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipalities_of_Trentino. I am living in Trentino. Some names in German of these municipalities are surprising me, because I never heard about that. These names were imported by Google Maps too, as written in this article: https://www.salto.bz/article/03102016/tolomisten-heute Which is the source you used for these names in German? thank you

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Gryffindor.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gryffindor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alfonso de Borbón Dampierre, Duke of Cádiz listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alfonso de Borbón Dampierre, Duke of Cádiz. Since you had some involvement with the Alfonso de Borbón Dampierre, Duke of Cádiz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

House of Croÿ move

Hello Gryffindor, I see you moved House of Croÿ recently to just "Croÿ" and made the lede similarly short. Any particular reason for this? Would you complain if I moved it back to the old title? It seems very abrupt to just talk about "Croÿ is an international family". Like, Kennedy family doesn't say "Kennedy is an American family." SnowFire (talk) 03:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ping on this? I'm going to move it back to the old title if you don't have any objections. SnowFire (talk) 17:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tuileries Palace

I noticed you removed the definite article from the lead sentence, i.e., "Tuileries Palace..." instead of "The Tuileries Palace...". I'm wondering why you removed it. The name is not, for example, like Buckingham Palace, where the definite article is usually omitted. Is that what you were thinking? "The" is commonly used before" Tuileries Palace" in most English-language sources: see a Google search for "Tuileries Palace". I think we should follow the practice most commonly found in English sources. Or were you thinking of the lead sentence as an encyclopedia entry, where the definite article would be omitted. (Since you did not remove the definite article in the remainder of the article, maybe this is what you intended?) However, the lead sentence is not an encyclopedia entry: it is a complete English sentence, so the definite article is included when it would ordinarily be used in an English sentence. (For example, see the lead sentences for Metropolitan Museum of Art or ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((Solomon)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) R. Guggenheim Museum.)--Robert.Allen (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone who knows linguistics might know the answer. I myself can't explain why "the" is used for one and not the other, but that's apparently the way it is. I usually try to rely on the books used as sources to determine these things. --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In most cases the definite article also seems to be used for Luxembourg Palace. Examples include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. I did run across a counterexample, the Michelin Guide: [8], which may be enough to prove the rule. --Robert.Allen (talk) 05:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

New Request

Hello, please can you delete this page, cause I wanna complete the renaming but I forget to suppress make redirect. Thanks--Alaa :)..! 08:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (Materialscientist) deleted it!--Alaa :)..! 08:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! Gryffindor (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:D-A logo.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:D-A logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Moxy (talk) 12:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.

I realise I'm "templating a regular." But at least two other editors have asked you to do the same to no avail. I'm hoping the third time may do the trick. It's frustrating to have to click on individual edits to have any idea of what you're doing on a page or group of pages. Thanks. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gobo (lighting)

Per WP:BRD, if a change you've made is reverted, you are not supposed to revert to your preferred version. You should open a discussion on the article talk page.

Your edit summary of "no, YOU go find references" is particularly egregious. When you're asked for references for a change you've made it's your job to provide them.

There is already a discussion about the expansion on the talk page (centering on "between" vs "before") - If you don't start your own section I will add this issue to that discussion.

And, as others have pointed out - please use a meaningful edit summary on every edit. It helps other editors' tasks immensely. Thank you for your understanding. Jeh (talk) 16:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Work/website

Hello. On this diff, which is correct? I changed it to website but it was changed back by another editor. Thanks --Jennica✿ / ^talk 07:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, Gryffindor, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day!

DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 09:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Crown Style

Hi Gryffindor, will you please attend to some comments I left for you at this articles talk page, and work out a better way to collaborate. I don't mind discussing how to improve the article with you, and I don't mind handing over to you, if you don't work that way. But I do mind you making broad changes to material, that other editors and myself have made without consultation. Thanks Dr.khatmando (talk) 12:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for coming to the discussion it was very helpful. I want to let you know that I appreciate your support and input. Dr.khatmando (talk) 01:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Dr.khatmando (talk) 01:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kakiemon elephants

I was curious why the need for this disambiguation? It seemed just fine without the parentheses. Note - I am not familiar with the subject matter so please excuse me if I have missed something obvious. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]