Jump to content

User talk:GroppeBoucher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, GroppeBoucher! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
Thank you very much for your warm welcome and advice, I really appreciate it. It's always great to have the guidance of a more experienced person.
--GroppeBoucher (talk) 01:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! GroppeBoucher, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boulogne 92 (October 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornelius Schmitt (October 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dub Schranz (October 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:40, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giuseppe Alberghini (October 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 05:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Durable (company) (October 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jovanmilic97 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mjolnir (Marvel Cinematic Universe) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mjolnir (Marvel Cinematic Universe). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nahal Rafiah (October 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 10:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Clauss Dietel (October 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabelle Choinière (October 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 17:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polyeco (October 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 00:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop submitting drafts to AfC

[edit]

Hi GroppeBoucher, please stop submitting drafts to AfC created by others unless you are certain they meet the notability guidelines. Many of the ones you have submitted were either declined or moved to draft for specific reasons. From what I can tell, you are not resolving the issues so it just creates additional work for others for an already backlogged process and serves no purpose. S0091 (talk) 21:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also requesting a response from you. Feel free to ask questions. S0091 (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atlètic Lleida (October 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

stop As requested above, stop submitting drafts to AfC that have previously either been declined or moved from mainspace to draft because of issues. Unless you make good faith attempt to resolve the noted issues, you should not submit them. If have questions, please do ask but if you continue this behavior it will lead to trouble for you. Please take this as a final warning. S0091 (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schlossturm, Düsseldorf (November 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurent de Gourcuff (November 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 21:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.

Stop resubmitting declined drafts without doing anything to address the decline reasons. It is seriously disruptive. bonadea contributions talk 21:06, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 20:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GroppeBoucher (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have made 770 edits to articles. I have asked for an unblock today via the talk page and have also sent an e-mail with a request for an unblock. I have been blocked since yesterday. Maybe someone wants to consider my request and give a reply?

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 08:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GroppeBoucher (talk) 02:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]