User talk:Griffin Wilkins

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Griffin Wilkins. Thank you for your work on Doucet, Quebec. Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add references.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 18:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doucet, Quebec moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Doucet, Quebec. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 18:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I have a source here that I forgot to put in: https://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_data/daily_data_e.html?timeframe=2&Year=1923&Month=2&Day=5&hlyRange=%7C&dlyRange=1922-06-01%7C1939-12-31&mlyRange=1922-01-01%7C1939-12-01&StationID=6033&Prov=QC&urlExtension=_e.html&searchType=stnName&optLimit=specDate&StartYear=1840&EndYear=2024&selRowPerPage=25&Line=0&searchMethod=contains&txtStationName=Doucet

It confirms the cold record, but apart from that, this town isn’t known for much, but I will try to do some more research to make this page worth keeping. Griffin Wilkins (talk) 22:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Doucet, Quebec

Draft:Doucet, Quebec, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Doucet, Quebec and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Doucet, Quebec during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KreekCraft

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KreekCraft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Baguette City" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Baguette City has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 30 § Baguette City until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 06:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s alright, you can go ahead and take this down. One of my friends used to call Paris “Baguette City” and I found it to be funny. I apologize if this redirect has caused an issue. I didn’t know if anyone would ever notice this redirect, but it appears that you are the first! Again, apologies for any issues, but I do get that this page is worthy of deletion now. Griffin Wilkins (talk) 08:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"November 12, 2001" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect November 12, 2001 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 27 § November 12, 2001 until a consensus is reached. C F A 💬 16:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2001 incident

The redirect 2001 incident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 9 § 2001 incident until a consensus is reached. 78.149.135.163 (talk) 19:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario, CA

The consensus is to target it to the disambiguation page. Don't change it again. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 06:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:North Battleford weatherbox

I'm confused by this edit. You change the minimum temperatures for two months but not for the year. In addition you didn't provide a source for that. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a source and the minimum temperature and when they occurred on the main page of North Battlefield, so the weatherbox was incorrect and I fixed it. Griffin Wilkins (talk) 17:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then it should have been added to the weatherbox and the yearly fixed. The template can be used in more articles and the reference needs to go with it. In this case both North Battleford and Battleford had the same reference. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"$0.50" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect $0.50 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 24 § $0.50 until a consensus is reached. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 03:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The authorities

Hello, Griffin Wilkins

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username 1ctinus and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect The authorities, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 26 § The authorities.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|1ctinus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-1ctinus📝🗨 14:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Mi scusi

Hello, Griffin Wilkins

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Mi scusi, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 28 § Mi scusi.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm easy to find" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect I'm easy to find has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 20 § I'm easy to find until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:02, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Holy shit, we're gonna fucking die" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Holy shit, we're gonna fucking die has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3 § Holy shit, we're gonna fucking die until a consensus is reached. Blethering Scot 23:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lytton, British Columbia

In this edit you said that Lytton, Canada redirected there but that link is red. Also the figure of 112.0 F isn't sourced and Canada uses Celsius. Even historical data is presented to the public in Celsius even if it was recorded in Fahrenheit. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was gonna make a Lytton, Canada redirect right after but I guess I just forgot, and if the rule is to put all the stuff in Celsius even if it was recorded in Fahrehnheit, I guess I'll abide by that. Griffin Wilkins (talk) 17:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's what the source says. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make that Lytton, Canada redirect if that's alright Griffin Wilkins (talk) 17:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's up to you but you may want to make it to Lytton#Canada rather than the article. I'm not sure which is best. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hang Tuah

Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the Wikipedia:Hatnote guideline (again, if you've previously read it). Perhaps help Wikipedia in some other way than editing hatnotes. I'm going to lose patience with you fairly quickly if I find myself reverting you much more. – wbm1058 (talk) 14:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]