User talk:Greenleaf2014

Welcome

Hello, Greenleaf2014, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 03:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please see WP:Notability (books) which explains the guidlines; the footnotes are not for citing the book itself, we don't have any doubts about what the book says. What we need is for you to show that the book matters in that other experts have paid attention to it. If it has no impact on the greater world, clearly demonstrated here, it doesn't need an article.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Greenleaf2014, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jordan Peterson

added links pointing to Milton, Egyptian, Babylonian and Erich Neumann

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMesquito was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheMesquito^buzz 21:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

I am declining this for several reasons. One, your article relies half on Youtube sources. These are all not reliable sources, and should be removed and replaced with proper reliable third-party sources. Two, your article basically consists of plot summary, which is not what we want. We want an article about the book's information other than what it talks about. This is not a site for a book report. The information on the individual chapters should be trimmed into one clear and concise summary section. Some more suggestions: Don't quote people too much, and don't quote them unsourced - paraphrasing is always better. Also, I ask you avoid comparing your article to other articles - see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Wikipedia is a work in progress, as such, there will be many articles less than perfect quality. If you must find some articles to compare, featured articles would be the way to go. Good luck.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 04:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief

Hello, Greenleaf2014. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 21:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief

Hello, Greenleaf2014. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]