User talk:GreenBlueYellow

Welcome!

Hello, GreenBlueYellow, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Missvain (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned Comment from User:Chaitali Nath

Thank you for supporting that edit

January 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Palagummi Sainath. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Vikram Vincent 21:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please Check WP:VAND before reverting an edit and tagging it as vandalism. Vikram Vincent 21:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Editing logged out and then logged in is not a good idea. Vikram Vincent 17:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir. I didn't understand what you mean. GreenBlueYellow (talk) 17:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Palagummi Sainath shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

September 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Moneycontrol.com. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 20:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm LR0725. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Businessworld—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 18:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. RegentsPark (comment) 18:26, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RegentsPark - CU confirmed. I'm not 100% sure about Algebraical, although the editing would suggest that; CU evidence suggests that it goes all the way back to Supriyya. Also BombaiyyaMag and a bunch of sleepers. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're a crazy wannabe stalker who has nothing to do. The government will ban you. LOL GreenBlueYellow (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. RegentsPark (comment) 19:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]