User talk:gracefool/Archive 2014-2019

Archives

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for a decade of excellence. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Editor Gracefool is a 10 year veteran of Wikipedia. The creator of 49 articles and 34 images, Gracefool "always leaves an edit summary" as a courtesy to subsequent editors. A member of the Typo Team and a WikiGnome, he has mentored many editors over the years. He prides himself in writing good captions for articles. As a Wiki Janitor, he is a jack-of-all-trades, a fixer of whatever needs to be fixed. Most of his work is hidden but he deserves recognition for it. Without the diligent work of this type of editor, Wikipedia would be a mess. Hard working veteran editors like this deserve a rousing and hearty thank you.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Gracefool

New Zealand

Editor of the Week
for the week beginning April 13, 2014

A 10 year veteran of Wikipedia;49 articles and 34 images. A member of the Typo Team,WikiGnome and a Wiki Janitor. Diligently works to clean up the mess that others leave.

Recognized for

Early Policy Development

Nomination page

Thanks again for your efforts! Go Phightins! 20:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks heaps, what a nice surprise! Pretty random though, how did you even find me? There are so many great editors to choose from.

I see these go up on the responses page, so while I have a sandbox, check out the policy section on my userpage re my thoughts on what we need to do to make Wikipedia a friendlier place. And thanks for doing your bit to encourage us old hands. ··gracefool ☺ 13:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Completely random - something about you caught my eye. A little research confirmed your demeanor. Thanks for your continuing efforts. ```Buster Seven Talk 15:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Welcome (no contrib)

A tag has been placed on Template:Welcome (no contrib) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 23:11, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. Actually {{Welcome0}} is a duplicate of {{Welcome (no contrib)}} which is is 3 years older, but all good. ··gracefool ☺ 09:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a nice template, they kind of stole your idea. Meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 22:38, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Shuasa (talk) 10:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not something I substantially contributed to... anyway I see it's been speedy kept. ··gracefool ☺ 23:53, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TemplateScript

Hello Gracefool. While updating TemplateScript in your common.js page, I noticed the templates you set up didn't seem to be working and fixed those for you. If you have trouble with any of my scripts, let me know and I'll help out. :) —Pathoschild 22:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Obviously I hadn't noticed... it looks like it could be very useful, is there a user guide somewhere? I can't remember how I found it. ··gracefool ☺ 20:27, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There was no user guide, so I wrote one and added it to m:TemplateScript for you. Let me know if you have any ideas to improve it. :) —Pathoschild 01:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I am being taunted by a deletionist for Marty Magehee article. I am new and need help. Your words are life. Thank you. Friendsof4him Friendsof4him 06:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tanya Thompson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tanya Thompson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:22, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tanya thompson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tanya thompson, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Midway Games

Category:Midway Games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fine with me. ··gracefool 💬 08:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replies on Boxing Gloves GA Review

Hello, Gracefool/Archive 2014-2019. You have new messages at Talk:Boxing glove.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Interwiki talkback}} or {{Itb}} template.

WPSamson (talk) 13:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replies on Boxing Gloves GA Review (new comment)

Hello, Gracefool/Archive 2014-2019. You have new messages at Talk:Boxing glove.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Interwiki talkback}} or {{Itb}} template.

WPSamson (talk) 06:24, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ (song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ (song). Since you had some involvement with the ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ (song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ana r chyte 09:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've participated. ··gracefool 💬 20:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decompression sickness

Two things:

Section links in most browsers are case-sensitive, so if you want to link to Decompression practice #Decompression tables, then making a link to Decompression practice #decompression tables does not "link it to the right place". Try clicking them to see.
There is a existing redirect which already points Dive tables to Decompression practice #Decompression tables. Wikipedia prefers redirects to piped links for multiple reasons, not least of which is keeping the wikitext readable; MOS:REDIR explains other reasons.

I've reverted your latest, incorrect edit. --RexxS (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. The MOS has changed, it used to recommend not linking to redirects. That's what happens when I don't read it in 12 years :p ··gracefool 💬 23:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Itenerary listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Itenerary. Since you had some involvement with the Itenerary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Itenery listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Itenery. Since you had some involvement with the Itenery redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Itinery listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Itinery. Since you had some involvement with the Itinery redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Itinirary listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Itinirary. Since you had some involvement with the Itinirary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Parkour

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parkour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 02:00, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Parkour

The article Parkour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Parkour for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 02:40, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BracketBot: Parkour

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Parkour may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

org/projects/leave-no-trace/ |archivedate=29 September 2012 |accessdate=18 April 2016)}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Without a Trace |work=Vertical Floor Magazine |author=Tenedra
date=9 July 2006|work=[[The Times]]|accessdate=3 January 2008|location=London}}</ref> ''[[Run (film|Run]]'' (2013),<ref>{{cite web |title=Run (2013) |work=IMDb |url=http://www.imdb.com/title/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! Thanked. ··gracefool 💬 21:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parkour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Run (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week : nominations needed!

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Parkour

The article Parkour you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Parkour for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Twinjet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twinjet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twinjet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gracefool. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gracefool. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WI listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WI. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week seeking nominations (and a new facilitator)

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

In addition, the WikiProject is seeking a new facilitator/coordinator to handle the logistics of the award. Please contact L235 if you are interested in helping with the logistics of running the award in any capacity. Remove your name from here to unsubscribe from further EotW-related messages. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of years in computer games

@Gracefool: Article was renominated for deletion. Since you have contributed to this first nomination of the article, I want you to be aware of this deletion and to weigh in on the decision again. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 16:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have commented. ··gracefool 💬 05:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good to find you

I just read your user page, and was such a pleasant experience that I thought I'd say thank you. Widefox; talk 12:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou very much :) ··gracefool 💬 03:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I like your user page too. It deserves to be seen by many. So, I've added it to the User page Hall of Fame. The Transhumanist 16:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you are a beginner-level JavaScript programmer...

I found you listed at Category:User js-1 (probably because you posted the corresponding userbox on your user page), and thought you might be interested in improving your skills by getting involved with developing user scripts, hobnobbing with other JavaScript programmers, and organizing and improving JavaScript articles and support pages.

We do all of that and more at the JavaScript WikiProject.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 16:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi im very new only came a few minutes ago but have been using Wikipedia for a long time :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikigrl2 (talk • contribs) 09:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Er, hi! Good on you for editing, even though your only edit (as of your comment) ran up against the deletionism problem (see the rant on my userpage). It's unfortunate that Wikipedia has become so unfriendly to new contributors - especially young ones such as yourself. Feel free to ask me any questions about how to contribute in a way that is less likely to be deleted. ··gracefool 💬 11:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Wikipedia is. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Wikipedia is redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've contributed. ··gracefool 💬 11:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2Essie

helloo

i amm now 11. oh, and do you like scratch? a coding website im 2essie ;)

[tikigrl2] 04:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

@Tikigrl2: No I hadn't seen Scratch (programming language) but it looks good. If you can make some more complicated original games you'll have a valuable skill few adults have. It's good that you have a brother to help :) I was also programming at your age, I started when I was 8. But my sister wasn't interested. ··gracefool 💬 13:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC) ··gracefool 💬 03:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gracefool. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Celestial Bureaucracy) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Celestial Bureaucracy, Gracefool!

Wikipedia editor Nikolaiho just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Your page is marked for deletion.

To reply, leave a comment on Nikolaiho's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nikolaiho^☎️📖 02:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Magic of Dungeons & Dragons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic of Dungeons & Dragons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic of Dungeons & Dragons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MoS:DAB listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MoS:DAB. Since you had some involvement with the MoS:DAB redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 18:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(This post was repeated 6 times on 4 June 2018 between 00:28 and 00:32 for Mos:DAB, Mos:DP, Mos:Dab, Mos:Dp, Mos:dab, Mos:dp, linking to a second associated redirect discussion)

Thanks ··gracefool 💬 07:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gracefool. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crystal View

The article Crystal View has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

With other mentions deleted, this is no longer a disambig; neither is it a candidate to be a redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It doesn't seem that Fujitsu uses the brand anymore so yeah it doesn't have much value, go ahead and delete so far as I'm concerned. ··gracefool 💬 09:53, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Water fab listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Water fab. Since you had some involvement with the Water fab redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 99Electrons (talk) 23:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I forget why I created it (it was before the common usage of categorized redirects), probably for misspelling, so I don't mind it being deleted. ··gracefool 💬 03:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Welcomeip2

Template:Welcomeip2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — MarkH21 (talk) 21:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, have replied. ··gracefool 💬 08:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Culture of Wellington Help Wanted

Hey, I heard you live in New Zealand. I've made a draft article about the Culture of Wellington. Interested in helping expand it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leavepuckgackle1998 (talk • contribs) 07:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:D&d original.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:D&d original.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:D&d Box1st.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:D&d Box1st.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Locathah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Locathah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locathah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prime Material Plane

The article Prime Material Plane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional location passes WP:GNG or WP:NFICTION

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]