User talk:Gproud

Welcome

Hello, Gproud, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Deepu Joseph. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Provide an Edit summary
Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
Create a User page

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask - Just click the talk button on my signature.
thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu_Joseph |TALK}

User:Gproud/Natural gas pipelines in Queensland

Hi there. Rather than delete outright I have moved your article into your userpace for you to work on (link above) - it will be quite safe there and you have as long as you need to get some content in it before moving it back to mainspace. Best of luck, regards, nancy 15:19, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intergen (Power Company).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 10:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Energy Safety (Deaths per TWh).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cheers! Stella ^BATPHONE _GROOVES 03:01, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Upstream (petroleum industry), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KBR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About your edits to Upstream (petroleum industry)

Hi, Graham:

I noticed your recent edits to the Upstream (petroleum industry) article as I was re-wording the introduction. I don't quite understand what you meant by the latter part of this edit of yours: "With the development of methods for extracting methane from coal seams, there has been a significant shift toward including unconventional gas as a part of the upstream sector, and corresponding developments in liquified natural gas (LNG) processing and transport."

Did you mean that coal bed methane and LNG processing and transport are both now considered to be in the upstream sector?
Or did you mean that coal bed methane now being considered to be in the upstream sector has somehow affected the processing and transport of LNG?

Would you please elaborate just what you meant by "corresponding developments in liquified natural gas (LNG) processing and transport." Thanks in advance, mbeychok (talk) 01:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of power stations in Queensland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| align="left" | Tarong Gas Turbine]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's CLEVER! Who would have thought?--Graham Proud (talk) 13:07, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Put new comments at the bottom of a talk page

Gproud, thank you for your comment on talk:Magnetite and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed, though, that you put your comment at the top of the page. The convention in Wikipedia is to put new comments at the bottom; have a look at Talk page layout for more information. If you're starting a new discussion, you can click on the "New section" tab and the editor will take care of the placement. RockMagnetist (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intergen (Power Company) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intergen (Power Company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Intergen (Power Company)

Hello Gproud. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Intergen (Power Company).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intergen (Power Company)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Energy in Queensland

Would you please re-write your recent contributions to Energy in Queensland into prose so that it makes sense. Try to provide context so that someone unfamiliar with the topic has clarity. Also we don't capitalise all words in titles. - Shiftchange (talk) 05:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Energy in Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tim McLennan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tim McLennan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 09:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Refs - Tim McLennan

Sorry, but on Wikipedia you cannot 'vouch for' anything. Also, LinkedIn is not a reliable independent source. The profilemay be accurate, but it is not independent. The other two are at best profiles and not independent again. See WP:RS. Peridon (talk) 15:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brett Smith (energy executive)

Hello, Gproud. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Brett Smith (energy executive), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gproud. I noticed you have been adding some sources. Unfortunately as far as I can tell none of them meet WP:RS standards. If you haven't see it before, can I suggest you take a look at Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. If you want I will give you a little time to dig up some RS sources that establish notability. But as it stands right now I am inclined to send the article to AfD. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...can I have until the weekend? I should be working now! I read at WP:RS that "News reporting from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact" so I don't really understand your concern. QGC and the BG Group are absolutely HUGE ($18Billion), so I don't understand how this is not "notable".

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar Hurricane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fusion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

BracketBot notices deleted.

Would you like to comment

On my idea at Talk:Cogeneration#Combined_heat_and_power_plant_needs_an_article? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halemba Power Station

I have stubbed a new power station article, and noted some discrepancies. First, the List of power stations in Poland incorrectly gives the number 100 MW instead of 200 MW (as per English language sources in the article and others I've found most sources give the 200 number; I've seen only one which gave 100). However, while the pl wiki article seems not to mention it (I've updated it), according to numerous sources [1], the power plant has ceased/limited operation in 2006, with its generators being put in reserve, and is being totally closed since 2012. Various sources I see are a bit unclear whether there are plans to reopen it, or just tear down, but are leaning towards the site being totally re-purposed. Should we add a "former power plants" section to the list? The article's body and catagories will probably need updating, too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 28 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of power stations in Poland page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brett Smith (energy executive) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brett Smith (energy executive) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Smith (energy executive) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:17, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tim McLennan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim McLennan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim McLennan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ralph Craven for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Craven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Craven until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies

I have nominated a few biographies that you created, for deletion and have tagged a couple of others as not having met WP:BLPNOTE. Please do not write articles about friends and colleagues (see WP:COI ) and please do not use unreliable sources such as wikipedia mirrors and linkedin. In general, just holding a senior position and doing your job does not warrant a wikipedia article. Best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 00:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Simshauser for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Simshauser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Simshauser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:31, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Body of Knowledge may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

make up a professional domain, as defined by the relevant [[Learned society|learned society]] or [[[professional association]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Szombierki Heat Power Station

I stubbed it, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to expand it into a DYK (it is an interesting monument of industry/engineering). I can take care of the Polish sources, which describe history and plans; can you see if you can find any (English?) sources about the technical aspects? Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Recording your vote

Hi Georgij

Based on your comment on the voting voting, "For list based on GDP or on electricity production" I was wondering if you meant your vote to be in the Vote Against column?

--Graham Proud (talk) 02:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mistake. I voted for because I agreed on given condition which was top 50 or 60 countries by GDP. – Georgij Michaliutin (talk) 02:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Criticality accident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibaraki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glossary of power generation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ash, Throttling and Plasma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chain reactions and fusion

The P-P reaction chain only occurs in stars, not in commercial fusion reactors, which generally use D-T fusion. The products of D-T fusion are Helium-4 and neutrons, neither of which are capable of causing additional fusion reactions. Other forms of fusion are similar; for example, fusion does not create muons, so muon-catalysed fusion is a one-time deal.

The P-P chain itself is a reaction chain rather than a chain reaction in the nuclear sense because it is not self-sustaining; it requires a solar mass or so of reactants to generate the necessary pressure for reactions to happen at all, and if you could magically remove that mass the reactions would cease instantly. In addition the PP-I branch releases fewer protons than are needed to initiate it (two versus six), meaning it only leaves enough for a third of a reaction to follow it; the PP II, III and IV types leave no useful reactants at all. Classic fission of U-235 requires one free neutron but produces three, resulting in a reaction that can directly cause up to three further identical reactions.

Diffen is a wiki (and the article primarily references wikipedia) and thus not a valid citation for a claim to the contrary, and fusion projects like the European Fusion Development Agreement state explicitly that fusion is not chain reaction. Herr Gruber (talk) 09:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of power stations in Japan

Hi. I've been editing this article - and I see you've worked on it as well. I've been at pains to identify the individual plants, correct their names and link up with individual articles in Japanese, i.e. language work.

I think your interest is probably more technical. If you are still interested I'd be grateful for your opinion about the organization of the article, e.g. what the size cutoff limit should be for hydro plants. Many of these are currently not listed but I don't know what criteria we should use for inclusion. That's just an examples. I have other questions! Regards Klein zach 06:59, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of power stations in Qatar

Hello, Gproud. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of power stations in Qatar, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dudel250 (talk) 01:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of power stations in Argentina may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of power stations in Malaysia page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of power stations in Malaysia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [Sungai Piah Upper Power Station]] || || Sungai Perak || || 14.6 ||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Your draft article, User:Gproud/Melanie Perrin (discography)

Hello, Gproud. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melanie Perrin (discography)".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 22:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]