User talk:Goobysnack

This is Goobysnack's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reorgimoritis (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reorgimoritis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I don't understand the need for references if this is a portmanteau and parody. Do I need to reference the definitions of Rigor Mortis and reorganization? Goobysnack (talk) 17:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goobysnack! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reorgimoritis (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sir MemeGod was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please reorgimoritis the references before resubmitting, and please also add more reliable, secondary sources. :)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reorgimoritis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sir MemeGod  17:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added references. Goobysnack (talk) 18:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reorgimoritis (October 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: NONE of the sources mention the topic?

Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this rejection. It's LITERALLY a made up word. It is an original reference. Goobysnack (talk) 20:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you made it up, which is why it was rejected, Wikipedia doesn't host original research or stuff that you made up. Theroadislong (talk) 20:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah my bad. I didn't know that. I created the definition on Wiktionary without issue. Goobysnack (talk) 21:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted there (I suppose by Surjection): see this. -- Hoary (talk) 00:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Reorgimoritis

The page Draft:Reorgimoritis has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

WP:A11 per user comment "there are literally no references to the word itself, because I just made it up," I think we can bend the rules regarding this applying in article space given that

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 02:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Goobysnack! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Portmanteau, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]