User talk:Golden Lab Records

Generally MySpace is not an accepted source to prove notability as anyone can create a MySpace page. I would suggest before making any more articles find better sources than MySpace to prove notability otherwise pages are deleted for not proving notability. Xtreme racer 02:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After looking at the page you provided this page still doesn't assert notability as I could find no mention of the band even after looking at the Golden Lab Records pages including the bio on Neptune which you said was related to the band or anywhere else on the page and as far as I can tell the band isn't mentioned on the Neptune Wikipedia page so notability isn't asserted still. Xtreme racer 02:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now my question is on the page the band seems to be named I HAI not EYE HAI. I am wondering if this is a misspelling or if it confirms the band doesn't really exist. I assume it's a spelling error but I will wait for confirmation. Xtreme racer 02:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IHAI was formerly used as an acronym for I Had An Inkling. EYE HAI is the band's new name, as featured on the myspace site, if you take a look.

I simply wanted to confirm that fact as I could not rely on MySpace but as you can tell I removed the tag because you have provided the information needed to make the article notable. But for the future when you leave comments on talk pages please put ~~~~ at the end of your message so people know who made the comment. Have fun contributing further to Wikipedia. Xtreme racer 02:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As for anyone being able to create a myspace site, well, anyone can create a regular website too.

Apologies Golden Lab Records 02:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is someone can create a MySpace site with minimal effort and at no cost while a regular website does cost money to develop and usually someone committing vandalism isn't going to spend money just to vandalize. But thank you for following my suggestion about signing your posts as it makes everyone's life a little easier and don't worry about the article problems it is the job of a Wikipedia editor to always assume good faith and work with editors to solve problems not create them. Xtreme racer 03:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chalaque (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chalaque (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 14:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 15:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Golden Lab Records. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Chalaque (band), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 15:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 16:37, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chalaque (band)

The article Chalaque (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks asserted notability together with references in reliable sources. Asserts just sufficient notability to avoid speedy deletion, but insufficient to remain.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 07:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]