User talk:Goara1

April 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I recognise that you are new here, so please let me give you some friendly advice. When you make an edit, and someone else undoes it, we call that a revert. Rather than reinstate your edit, you need to go to the article's talk page (here), and make the case for why your edit should be included. Just reinstating it against others' objections is known as edit warring, and it will ultimately get your account blocked. The content you added had no citations, and it was written in an inappropriately informal, editoralising manner - we don't do that here. You need to be encyclopedic - neutral, factual, devoid of editorial comment - and your content needs to summarise reliable sources, and to cite those sources. We don't just write what we know/think/believe about a subject. Thank you. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I apologize for reverting the changes and publishing the article without citing sources. I have reviewed the policies and I understand the importance of adhering to them. I have practical experience with a project relevant to this topic I was editing, and I will be presenting the published article. While there is additional content to be added, I commit to doing so with proper citations and keep it in line with encyclopedia standards. Thank you.

Goara Goara1 (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know what you mean when you say that you will be 'presenting the published article'. Regardless, you must engage with other editors when they disagree to your changes. I would strongly advise you to propose any further changes on the talk page before implementing them. Girth Summit _(blether) 22:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Girth Summit,

Thank you for your feedback and I am truly sorry for causing the inconvenience. I understand it is really important to engage with the other editors when they disagree with my changes but I do not think your feedback really helped me resolve where I was going wrong. I did reply on this talk page for reverting and publishing without citations and using inappropriately informal writing when I honestly clicked on "publish changes" before it hit me that I did not cite. I regret doing that, I apologized and I replied on the talk page stating "While there is additional content to be added, I commit to doing so with proper citations and keep it in line with encyclopedia standards." which clearly means I aim to propose further changes and I did not hear anything from any other editor. To be precise, this is a contribution for my final project, and not like I have any other choice for this project. I am trying my best on enhancing the page by trying not to misguide information or just trying to do it for the sake of my project. I am working on wikipedia editing for the second time and I'm learning. I respect every editor's feedback and I will post the further changes that I plan to make soon. I appreciate your patience and guidance.

Best,

Goara Goara1 (talk) 00:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding citations, but blogs are not usable sources on Wikipedia. See WP:RS for details. MrOllie (talk) 22:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You went ahead and reinstated it without any talk page discussion. Please don't do that again, or your account may be blocked. Girth Summit _(blether) 22:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MrOllie,

Thank you for mentioning that and I am truly sorry for causing the inconvenience. I am trying my best to follow the policies and guidelines. I am only trying to contribute to the page just as any other editor making changes to it right now. I appreciate your patience.

Best,

Goara Goara1 (talk) 23:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 02:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Goara1 (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]