User talk:Glovacki

Welcome!

Hello, Glovacki! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:51, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Removal of valid categories from articles

I'm sure there's an outstanding reason why you're doing this, probably something to do with Categories needing consistency, but by removing Cats without any useful edit summary, you are giving an appearance of being a vandal and I'm really pushing AGF hard not to mass revert you. You need to think about other editors when doing this kind of thing. --Dweller (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I created Category:Jewish educational institutions and redirected Category:Jewish seminaries to it. But in the article about London School of Jewish Studies already exist Category:Orthodox Jewish educational institutions which is subcategory of Category:Jewish educational institutions. So I deleted Category:Jewish seminaries from London School of Jewish Studies. --Glovacki (talk) 21:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- That is because both a primary school and a rabbinic seminary are educational institutions. Go back and undo your work now please. --Dweller (talk) 21:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Why undo it? Category:Jewish educational institutions consist from Category:Orthodox Jewish educational institutions and Category:Progressive Jewish higher education. Also exist Category:Jewish educational institutions by country and special types of Jewish educational institutions (Category:Yeshivas and Category:Jewish day schools). What are rabbinic seminaries? --Glovacki (talk) 21:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - If you don't know what a rabbinic seminary is, you have absolutely zero right to go messing with a single one of these Categories. You don't know what you're doing. Go back and undo all your changes. --Dweller (talk) 21:30, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - By words "What are rabbinic seminaries?" I meant "why do we need to categorize them independently from other Jewish educational institutions?" :) --Glovacki (talk) 21:32, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let us move this discussion to a proper place - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism. Ok? --Glovacki (talk) 21:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI report.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I need to go to bed. --Dweller (talk) 21:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

As here.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Epeefleche (talk) 23:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CFD

Please do not empty categories just so they can be deleted. Read up on the requirements for category deletion at WP:CFD, especially notice the area for Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Categories possibly emptied out of process. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop now

You've been told to stop and discuss. Stop now and discuss. I will not block you myself, because we are in dispute, but I will ask another administrator to block you if you do not stop making mass changes to Categories without consensus. --Dweller (talk) 09:24, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See the discussion at WT:JUDAISM. And the comments sections above this. --Dweller (talk) 09:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See the wisdom of DGG at WT:JUDAISM: "Glovacki, mass changes in categories are not a place where being Bold is usually helpful. they take so much work to undo, that they really ought to be discussed first, even when you're certain that you;re right. (Personally, I feel that way abut mass changes or edits or nominations in anything unless we're dealing with vandalism). DGG ( talk ) 01:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)" --Dweller (talk) 09:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History of the Republic of Kosovo

Category:History of the Republic of Kosovo, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 19:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please dont add this category, we already have bigger and more important category, so this is not needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anastan (talk • contribs) 18:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to West Galicia seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:38, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Glovacki. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 00:47, 11 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:47, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Western Ukrainian clergy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aprium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brown rot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nahor, son of Serug

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nahor, son of Serug, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.bing.com/knows/nahor?mkt=zh-cn.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Burgundy map

Hello Glovacki- Explaining my revert of your addition of the Burgundy map: Those don't look like modern regional borders, if that's what you intended to portray. If you want to show how the historical extent of Burgundy compares to present-day regional borders, you would want to put the borders layer above the province polygon. Otherwise, if the borders you show are those of former provinces, you should indicate that as well as what era they represent. This category page on Commons might be a good place to look for examples. Also, please make a habit of providing edit summaries. Eric ^talk 12:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Case of Schlitke

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Case of Schlitke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Neutron into Free neutron decay. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Glovacki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category speedy

Just a heads up, Glovacki, that I moved Category:Wikidata-redirects to Category:Wikidata redirects to minus the hyphen. The former has been tagged with a {{db-catempty}} since all the entries are in the new category. And I like the new special rcat template you created! Paine Ellsworth ^u/c 16:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scottish Marches has been nominated for discussion

Category:Scottish Marches, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History of Ukraine (1569–1795) has been nominated for discussion

Category:History of Ukraine (1569–1795), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Doctors of Law has been nominated for discussion

Category:Doctors of Law, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I have added to that deletion discussion Category:Doctors of both laws, which you also created. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Glovacki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish Nazi collaboration has been nominated for discussion

Category:Jewish Nazi collaboration, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Catrìona (talk) 20:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at History of the Russian language in Ukraine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:39, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Donetsk. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:21, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Glovacki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Glovacki. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:53, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TonyBallioni, when I used multiple accounts illegitimate? You wrote that that multiple accounts are allowed. --Glovacki (talk) 09:49, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Interaction analyser shows 16 pages where two or more of your accounts edited the same page. For example, in the article on Linear subspace, at 09:17, 21 September 2018 L50g made the same edit that Lavidav made at 07:50, 20 September 2018. This created the illusion that two different editors were making the same edit, and is considered deceptive. Toddy1 (talk) 11:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - This. Plus, running a cross-wiki sock farm in itself is pretty high on the list of things that are unlikely to ever be constructive. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Light cruisers of the United States

A tag has been placed on Category:Light cruisers of the United States indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikidata redirects has been nominated for renaming

Category:Wikidata redirects has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laxeril (talk) 07:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]