User talk:GlennRay77
Hello, GlennRay77, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ssilvers. Thank you for your contributions so far. Here are a few important links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- Manual of Style
- Editing by consensus – working well with other Wikipedians
If you'd like some help on editing, you can sign up at the new users log or ask me on my discussion (talk) page. I would be very happy to help! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need other help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, post a question at the Help Desk, or ask me. It is always wise to read the most recent entries at the bottom of the talk page of an existing article before making major changes to it. Before I make a major change to an article, I often make a proposal on the talk page and see if anyone minds.
Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Pointed the listing of the TV show "John Gunther's High Road" in the "1959-60 United States TV Schedule" to the "High Road" section of the "John Gunther" article (John Gunther's High Road) -- also put a relevant comment on the section heading in the "John Gunther" article that the section was now linked.GlennRay77 (talk) 21:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Glenn,
Thanks for your work on Wikipedia. Charley Weaver's Hobby Lobby looks great. Terrific start, sir. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 03:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Nice creation. I can't believe this article didn't already exist. I looked around for a duplicate, but looks like you're the first. Thanks. Shadowjams (talk) 08:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Wonderful! Wonderful! Wonderful! You did a great job with great research and fantastic links. Not only was I also shocked this article didn't already exist, I was stunned some months ago to discover that the show was not even referred to in the Dick Clark article! I am the one who added to that article, but did not have the time or the resources to do the fantastic research which you did. Thank you so much. Couple of minor comments: are you sure "David Seville" appeared on this show? My recollection is that Dick Clark himself lip synced the David Seville portion of the Chipmunk records. Also: are you sure this show was filmed? At the time, we were always given the impression that it was broadcast LIVE? But this could be a result of my childhood naievity. Do you agree that Dick Clark's weekly ritual of unveiling the "Top Ten" records of the coming week is obviously the inspiration for David Letterman's bit? Nghtownclerk (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)nghtownclerkNghtownclerk (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
What a nice nice response! Thank you for taking the time. I can believe that the top 10 lists so obiquitious in the 1970's were David Letterman's inspiration, but I still contend that the FORMAT was the invention of Dick Clark! Clark was the first one that used a number ten to number one countdown format. That is not how People Magazine and a dozen other publications did it (including the New York Post, as I recall). "Your Hit Parade", on the radio in the 1930's and 1940's, and on television in the 1950's, predated Dick Clark. Every week it presented the top ten songs of the week, but in random order. The last song of each show was number one, but numbers two through ten could come in any order. Dick Clark was the first with the number ten to number one "count down", and as far as I know to this day David Letterman is the only other one to do it in that manner! Nghtownclerk (talk) 22:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)nghtownclerkNghtownclerk (talk) 22:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Titles
[edit]If you read:
You will find that tiles of television programs, books, ships names, album titles, etc., are italicized.
THNKS. > Best O Fortuna (talk) 20:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI
[edit]Another editor is asking about your draft: User talk:GlennRay77/Dangerous Assignment --NeilN talk to me 01:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 01:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DES (talk) 01:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, GlennRay77. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Sammy Kahn for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sammy Kahn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.