User talk:Giorgio.bonuccelli76

Giorgio.bonuccelli76, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Giorgio.bonuccelli76! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parallels Remote Application Server(RAS) (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by K.e.coffman were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Parallels Remote Application Server(RAS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Parallels Remote Application Server(RAS), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 02:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi K.e.coffman this content is very similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XenApp is it an advert too? 04:33,26 October 2018 (UTC) Hi K.e.coffman did you see my message? 10:33,26 November 2018 (UTC) Hi K.e.coffman this content is very similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XenApp is it an advert too? 04:33,26 October 2018 (UTC) Hi K.e.coffman did you see my message? 10:33,26 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Parallels Remote Application Server(RAS)

Hello, Giorgio.bonuccelli76. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Parallels Remote Application Server".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:21, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @JMHamofor the kind explanation, I am happy with the deletion Giorgio.bonuccelli76 (talk) 10:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dedaub LTD (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dedaub LTD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Giorgio.bonuccelli76. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 21:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Wikishovel (talk) for sharing conflict of interest (COI) guidelines. I'll do my best to follow them. I don't receive any compensation for my contributions to WIKIPEDIA GiorgioB (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Idoghor Melody,

I understand that the initial submission of this page Draft:Dedaub LTD ‎was declined due to a lack of adequately supported reliable sources. I appreciate your focus on ensuring that all information is verified.

However, I'd like to point out that new references have been added to reinforce the credibility of the submission. These sources are highly reputable and speak directly to the expertise and track record of Dedaub in the field of smart contract security and auditing.

The company's significance in the space is substantiated through multiple aspects such as:

Company Legitimacy and Registration: Malta Business Registry, with Company Registration Number C 99606, clearly establishes Dedaub's legal standing.

Expert Publications: Contributions in ACM and ISSTA proceedings like "Elipmoc: advanced decompilation of Ethereum smart contracts" demonstrate the academic prowess of Dedaub's team.

Vulnerability Disclosures and Awards: Reports in reputable outlets like Times of Malta, thedefiant.io, and Finance.Yahoo.com highlight the value Dedaub has added to the blockchain community by discovering critical vulnerabilities.

Client Impact Stories: Coverage in theblock.co, indianexpress.com, and u.today speak to specific vulnerabilities Dedaub has unearthed in widely-used protocols like Uniswap, Multichain, and Poly Network.

Industry Influence: Interviews and podcasts like "Web3 Innovators - Conor Svensson and Yannis Smaragdakis" demonstrate how the industry values Dedaub's founder's contribution.

Given these additional references, I kindly request that you reevaluate the submission. It is crucial for entities that are diligently working to secure the blockchain ecosystem to gain the right visibility to continue to move the field of information security forward.

Thank you for your consideration. GiorgioB (talk) 15:32, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dedaub LTD (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David Gerard was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too many crypto sources, RS is a passing mention. Needs clear mainstream RSes - David Gerard (talk) 18:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dedaub LTD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David Gerard (talk) 18:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neville Grech for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neville Grech is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Grech until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kj cheetham (talk) 14:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dedaub LTD

Hello, Giorgio.bonuccelli76

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Alpha3031, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Dedaub LTD, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Alpha3031}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

== Disagree with Dedaub_LTD Deletion ==

HiAlpha3031 and Explicit , I apologize for delaying noticing this deletion, but I was not around for some personal issues. I'd like to object to the deletion of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dedaub_LTD&action=edit&redlink=1 and that the page was notable enough and has many media coverages online, and I'm afraid I have to disagree with the deletion proposal. GiorgioB (talk) 09:57, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dedaub LTD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Dedaub LTD, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Renewal6 (talk) 10:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Dedaub LTD

Hello Giorgio.bonuccelli76, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dedaub LTD, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dedaub LTD.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CFA}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C F A 💬 22:40, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]