User talk:GillRomesLado

Welcome

Hello GillRomesLado and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Mehtab Kaur, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 23:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, sorry I was actually talking to a descendant of the Fakir family.... and they stated that. Datar Kaur was also the Maharani ( as she was the one that stayed with Ranjit Singh the most as he didn't get along with Mehtab) so I thought she probably got the title after the death of the first one maybe I was mistaken sorry about that. GillRomesLado (talk) 00:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GillRomesLado, Oh, that's fine. Just make sure to verify the source and text before adding it. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 01:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GillRomesLado, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GillRomesLado! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Chand Kaur. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 06:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Multana Singh, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 06:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Datar Kaur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nakai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Datar Kaur in popular culture, wrong information

Recently you added information about the role Datar Kaur#In popular culture being played by Vibha Bhagat in Maharaja Ranjit Singh (TV series) but I just checked and found that Vibha Bhagat played the role of Guddo, the sister of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, daughter of Dewan Lakhpat Rai. Please check and provide reliable source when adding a new information. Here is a link about Vibha Bhagat [1]. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 09:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know I fixed it GillRomesLado (talk) 09:43, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Abhishek0831996 (talk) 10:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERLINK

Hi there, re: these edits, you went overboard with the linking. We should only be linking sparingly, and we should avoid any duplicates. See WP:OVERLINK. Every link in an article is going to compete with other links for readers' attention, so we have to be judicious. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Misl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mai.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Charat Singh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I am reading a book on sikh misls and my information was from that book and I had spent a lot of time and effort on this page.The thing is I wasn't able to properly cite my book. Was gonna have someone do it for me..... anyways I'll keep that in mine that I will cite my source before I exit the page. Thank you GillRomesLado (talk) 11:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Desan Kaur, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naudh Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naudh Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Northern Escapee (talk) 08:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Aditya Dhar, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- DaxServer (talk) 07:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sher Singh seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thank you and sorry I didn't mean to make it sound biased, but I will make sure not to so this is the future. GillRomesLado (talk) 05:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Nakai Misl has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The book "History Of The Sikh Misals"'s license is not compatible with that of Wikipedia. eviolite (talk) 06:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I fixed the citation issue. Thank you GillRomesLado (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Datar Kaur

added a link pointing to Darbar

Nakai Misl

added a link pointing to Darbar

Ranjit Singh

added a link pointing to Jatt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Datar Kaur

added a link pointing to Darbar

Nakai Misl

added a link pointing to Darbar

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright warning

Your edit to Kharak Singh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Punjabi people

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Punjabi people appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Your edit to Sultan Mahmud Khan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello, I've seen your edits at Ranjit Singh and as I know nothing about the topic, I have no way of knowing if your edits are good. Please explain why your edits are making the article better in your edit summaries. Thank you, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 01:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) because of copyright violations in that area.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 03:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been previously warned several times for copyright violations, and got a final warning for them in November 2021. In December 2021, you created Yesubai Bhonsale, which was closely phrased to its sources in some places and outright copied from it in others. Compare the sentence "On the expected and sad end of her husband she appointed her brother-in-law, Rajaram the Chhatrapati and on her command Rajaram left the capital fort to safety at Vishalgarh" to what the source says: "on the unexpected and sad end of Sambhaji the Marathas raised Shivaji's second son Raja Ram to the throne [...] Raja Ram was immediately sent out of the fort to a place of safety at Vishalgarh..." you misrepresented what the source was actually saying on top of copying from it. If you want to be unblocked, you must commit to not copying content from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 03:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GillRomesLado (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Hey Moneytrees I am relatively new and still navigating my way around wiki. I have contributed and improved many articles as well. I have read and understood the issues better now, next time if don't understand something I will ask before editing on wiki. If you fell appropriate please let me know how I can get myself unblocked. Thank you

Decline reason:

No response to query below in eight days. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I've moved your unblock request from my talk to your talk. When it comes to unblocking someone for copyright issues, there needs to be clear understanding of what was done wrong and what will be done differently in the future. While I have no doubt you regret anything you've done wrong, your unblock request is a little too vague: you say, "read and understood the issues better now", could you explain what you read and how your understanding of these "issues" has changed? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

GillRomesLado (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello sorry for the late reply I have been busy with some work. Like I said that I am new and still navigating my way. Despite my mistakes in citing i have contributed to and improved many articles. Once I was given a warning as I didn't cite my sources, the thing was and I even explained then that I was still in the process of adding my sources and later on I did. What got me blocked is my written material on the Yesubai page. The thing is I read the books I stated and even added then in the sources in the work cited area. I was under the understanding that we need to use mostly what's written I am extremely apologetic of my misinterpretation on the sources. I assumed if I provided the sources it what's required. I have re read all the rules and regulations and have understood the them much better. If I do get unblocked I do commit to not copying content from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright. Thank you

Accept reason:

Per discussion below. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:41, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand what you are saying correctly, the issue is is that you thought that it was ok to copy from sources as long as you cite them. You're now saying you understand that you cannot copy from sources, even if they have been cited. Is my understanding correct? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that's what I am saying GillRomesLado (talk) 20:04, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to accept this, but one thing is bothering me. The sentence "If I do get unblocked I do commit to not copying content from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright" in your appeal is very similar to the sentence "If you want to be unblocked, you must commit to not copying content from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright" in my block rationale; in other words, you copied content when you said you would not be doing it. Could you maybe expand on why you did this, and if you understand what that sentence means? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 02:53, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I am so sorry I thought I had to write that "If I do get unblocked I do commit to not copying content from sources and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright"

So sorry I went back and re-read our discussion... sorry I thought I was supposed to wrote that.

I am sorry but I know how I can use quotes and how to cite those and I shouldn't be taking or misinterpreting text without or even with Citation. I will follow the guidelines provided by Wikipedia to edit or create a page.

GillRomesLado (talk) 02:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you show me how you would now write what I removed from that article with your new found knowledge, using the cited source? You can just reply to this comment with it. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 04:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Upon the death of Samabhaji his widow, Yesubai appointed his brother, Rajaram the king of the Marathas instead of her son, Shahuji. Rajaram was sent out to Vishalgarh while Yesubai defended the Raigard Fort against the deployed Mughal army. On November 13, 1689 the fort fell to the Mughals and Yesubai was imprisoned in Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb's jail along with her son and other family members.

Mehta, Jl. Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 1984.

I have typed this on my phone so I am sorry if the format is a bit off. GillRomesLado (talk) 05:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's a good improvement. I have some minor corrections that would make your rewrite read better.

Upon the death of Samabhaji his widow, Yesubai... can become "Upon the death of Samabhaji, Yesubai..."; the widow part can be removed, as at this point in the article we already know she was married to Samabhaji at the time, so we can infer that she would be his widow. It's an unneeded detail; a good way to avoid copyright issues in your writing is to cut out on unnecessary details the source mentions.

Yesubai appointed his brother, Rajaram the king of the Marathas instead of her son, Shahuji. I would change this to "Yesubai appointed Samabhaji's brother Rajaram as king of the Marathas in turn of her son Shahuji.", as I believe it is worded better.

In the next sentence, the word "deployed" can be removed. The last sentence is fine except for the phrase On November 13, 1689 the fort fell to the Mughals which is a bit too close to the source; I would change it to something like "The Mughals captured the fort on November 13, 1689". The source mentions that his happened due to "treachery" from an officer; that's an interesting detail I would recommend you try to work in.

For a rewrite, that was good; you're getting closer to proving yourself. One of your edits to Kharak Singh, where you added the paragraph Alexander Burnes, first ridiculed him in writing by describing him as an “imbecile”, later followed by Henry Lawrence, who actually never met the prince. not all Company men agreed with this assessment. Claude Martin Wade, who worked with the Lahore court for over 16 years and described Kharak Singh as a man with a “mild and humane disposition”, who was “loved by his dependants”. Wade went on to suggest that the prince appeared weak because out of respect never spoke much in his father's presence and in general chose to maintain a low profile. was removed as copied from this source. With the advice I've given above, could you reply to this comment with a rewrite of that paragraph using that source? (or another source if you feel a different one would be better). Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 06:11, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Section break

@Moneytrees: Is this still alive? > 2 weeks. Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I am so sorry I haven't been able to reply... got really busy with work. I really appreciate you helping me out and walking me through on how to made edits appropriately and responsibly.

"Having worked with Kharak Singh for 16 years Claude Martin Wade noted that the prince is a kind man of humane nature who was trusted and doted on by his dependants. Though other company men like Alexander Burnes and Henry Lawrence often dismissed him as an imbecile.

Reference: Atwal, Priya (2020). Royals and Rebels:The Rise and Fall of the Sikh Empire. London: C. Hurst Limited GillRomesLado (talk) 16:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Moneytrees: What say ye? Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been preoccupied with other things recently. Your rewrite is alright from a copyright perspective, but could use some changes for clarity/tone. I would change it to "Having worked with Kharak Singh for 16 years, Claude Martin Wade noted that the prince was "mild and humane disposition" and was "loved by his dependants". Other company men such as Henry Lawrence dismissed Singh as an "imbecile"." This is a case where it is ok to quote from the source; the text around the quotes is what you don't want to be similar to the source.

I think I'm willing to make an unblock, given your re writes. With that said, I ask that you keep your article creations in the Draft: space for the time being so they can be reviewed by others. I will continue to review your edits and give you advice in the meantime. Woulwd you be willing to accept these conditions? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 05:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I accept the conditions. Thank you so much for helping me. GillRomesLado (talk) 08:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be back. I have a dog to attend to. au revoir -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or let @Moneytrees: -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you GillRomesLado (talk) 21:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sandeep Anand (Actor) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sandeep Anand (Actor). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 03:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Palak Jain, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 05:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Palak Jain

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Palak Jain, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sandeep Anand (Actor)

Hello, GillRomesLado. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sandeep Anand (Actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Multana Singh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay thank you GillRomesLado (talk) 06:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]