User talk:Gettingreal2023

Misha Kouznetsov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Misha Kouznetsov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. Also remember that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED, the articles need to focus on Kouznetsov, not his pupils.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:33, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Gettingreal2023! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kj cheetham (talk) 21:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hi Gettingreal2023! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Catalán (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

awards are not notable and "focuses on merging practicality with his signature design ethos, with an emphasis on sustainability" is most definitely not neutral tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Catalán and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you are doing great. Upon you mentioning, I reviewed all the links and almost every link is as per the Wikipedia guidelines. The sources are independent, reliable, and secondary. Also, they do not simply mention the subject once or twice but discuss his work in detail independently.

Could you please specify which thing is missing from here? Could you specify any source here as an example? I think I might be missing something. Since, not all 12 sources can be unreliable, unworthy, and primary. As per your comment I have removed two awards, and changed the line to "The collection, named "Ushuaïa by Mercedes-Benz Fashion Talent David Catalán," integrates practical elements maintaining a focus on sustainability" Is it fine now? Should I resubmit it? Please guide. Gettingreal2023 (talk) 12:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gettingreal2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Misha Kouznetsov

Hello, Gettingreal2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Misha Kouznetsov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]