User talk:Georgiamarlins

Welcome to my talk page feel free to notify ,advice or ask me anything. Click here to leave me a message

.

AfC notification: Draft:Diego Tryno has a new comment ==

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Diego Tryno. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Numbering convention on Wikipedia

Hi - I noticed you've changed a few articles by adding either duplicate numeral or text values for numbers. The convention on Wikipedia is to only show one number, and if it's 1-10 we usually write those out with numbers. Anything higher than 10 is spelled out. Please see MOS:NUMERAL. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I changed them back for you. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 00:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diego Tryno (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet the criteria for the notability of musicians, as far as I can tell

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diego Tryno and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Diego Tryno, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Georgiamarlins! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Georgiamarlins. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Georgiamarlins! You created a thread called Requesting for information about a mainspace article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diego Tryno has been accepted

Diego Tryno, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Utopes (talk) 19:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thank you for your hard work improving the encyclopedia! Utopes (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diego Tryno for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diego Tryno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Tryno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 10:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mai Chisamba (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Improving the grammar would also be nice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mai Chisamba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mai Chisamba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject History!

Welcome to WikiProject History! We are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to history. Now that you're a member you might want to drop by one of our departments or join a task force. It is also recommended that you watchlist our talk page as well. Working Groups at WikiProject History:

Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces

Chris Troutman (talk) 23:39, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mai Chisamba has been accepted

Mai Chisamba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 01:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

MMXX Lunar Calendar

Georgiamarlins,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

– 2020 is a leap year – news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

– Utopes (talk) 04:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my family mate from the another mother. I am Ashlee Nyathi from Harare, Zimbabwe. I am the co-founder of Megprom trading company which supplier Kapenta fish. I had a wiki page last year and it was removed I guess deleted, I had 7 or 9 news sources when it was deleted. Now I have more then 15, but I don’t know who can help me to make it stand. Please please check it out and if it can stand please stand it and info me. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.246.52.11 (talk) 12:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashlee greetings to you from Botswana,i'm sorry your article was deleted.I checked news sources for your name and company and its quite amazing that you have publications from big newspapers in Zimbabwe which are reliable newspapers.However,the articles reads like advertisements and some seems not so independent from you and your company, yes i know right! its surprising when someone says that to you.Well Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and topics are chose based on few things which includes notability ' If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.' Read more on WP:GNG WP:BLP and many other factors.When i choose to create an article about a person , i make sure that i'm convinced they are notable and they meet the guidelines and unfortunately in your case i'm not yet convinced.However don't loose hope, someone might create another article for you and if you feel its taking long ,there are some editors who accepts paid editing WP:PAID and you can ask for more help at WP:AFCHD .Feel free to ask more questions .Thank you for reaching out. Cheers!Georgiamarlins (talk) 12:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreas Shoko (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nightenbelle were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Remove unnecessary capitalization and please find more independent sources not by the same author.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andreas Shoko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andreas Shoko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Georgiamarlins! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Royalty moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lucas Royalty, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up, I will look at and work on the article again. Cheers! Georgiamarlins (talk) 20:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lucas Royalty

Hello, Georgiamarlins. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucas Royalty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Lucas Royalty

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Lucas Royalty has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:38, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, please undelete the draft page Lucas Royalty and move it to my user page or draft space . I will work on it when I find new materials about the subject. Thank you. Georgiamarlins (talk) 13:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello Georgiamarlins. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Georgiamarlins. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Georgiamarlins|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Diego Tryno.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Diego Tryno.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of http://search.co.zw/diegotryno/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]