Jump to content

User talk:Georgesmith1975

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Georgesmith1975, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Floyd woodrow, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GirthSummit (blether) 15:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Floyd woodrow

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Floyd woodrow, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
  • It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of militaryspeakers.co.uk/speakers/floyd-woodrow. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GirthSummit (blether) 15:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

Hi - I noticed that most of your edits so far have been about a couple of motivational speakers. As you can see, I just nominated your new article about one of them for speedy deletion, because it was entirely copied and pasted from a promotional website. So, I'd like to ask you straight up - do you work for that website, or are you connected with it in any way, or otherwise connected to these people? If so, you need to read a few guideline pages - there are some good links in the welcome template above, but these in particular may apply to you: WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:NOTPROMO. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 15:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Girth, thanks for your input. I'm new to WikiPedia and trying to learn the platform by doing. The new article about Floyd Woodrow was an experiment, I now understand that I have to create the page in it's entirety before publishing it. And yes, I just copied the text from a Google Search found via a motivational speaker website (that I'm not connected with in any way whatsoever I can assure you). If you can suggest a topic that needs a new page creating then I'll happily give that a go and try again. Thanjs again for your help! All the best, GeorgeSmith1975Georgesmith1975 (talk) 15:48, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Georgesmith1975, OK, thanks for that assurance. What you write about is up to you - personally, I mostly do historic buildings, with the odd historic biography thrown in, and I'm thinking of getting into writing about notable mountains. The ideal subject to get started with is probably something you're somewhat interested in personally, but not something you're passionate about (we have to remain neutral) and certainly not something you have any financial stake in. I always work up an article in draft space and only publish it when it's ready. Just be careful not to make copyright violations, even in draft space - we can't host copyvio anywhere on the site. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 16:27, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping to write about inspiring individuals who go under the radar (such as Tom Avery and Floyd Woodrow) who have achieved so much in their lives yet don't get any recognition. I've read their books and can't understand why they 're not lauded by society. Anyhoo, thanks for the pointers and I'll read through the articles provided and have another go. All the best George Georgesmith1975 (talk) 16:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Georgesmith1975, if you want to write about living people, you'd do well to read WP:BLP, and have a read of WP:NOTABILITY too. Basically, you can write about them, but you must have sufficient reliable, independent secondary sources to support the article - not books by them, or websites promoting them, but stuff that other people have written about them; you also have to write neutrally and dispassionately, without trying to puff up their significance. If you can do all that, you're good to go. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 16:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ski Verbier Exclusive Limited (June 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Passengerpigeon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Passengerpigeon (talk) 11:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Georgesmith1975! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Passengerpigeon (talk) 11:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ski Verbier Exclusive Limited (July 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Spicy (talk) 19:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ski Verbier Exclusive Limited (September 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
please read WP:REFB for help with correctly formatting sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Avery, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 13:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ski Verbier Exclusive Limited (October 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sagotreespirit was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Sagotreespirit (talk) 13:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is likely not the right place for this. See WP:OUT. Thanks for the draft submission though. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 14:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would personally suggest checking out Wikivoyage. All the best. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 14:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sagotreespirit. I've moved the article to Wikivoyage as suggested and added several notable sources. I've also added a sentence explaining why Ski Verbier Exclusive are notable (they're the original Verbier luxury ski tour operator) in an effort to incorporate the feedback provided. Please advise if you feel this meets the criteria for a Wikivoyage article (if you can as I appreciate you may have time constraints. If any other administrators are able to offer guidance it would be very gratefully received. Thank you! Georgesmith1975 (talk) 10:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ski Verbier Exclusive has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ski Verbier Exclusive. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 07:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ski Verbier Exclusive

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Georgesmith1975. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ski Verbier Exclusive, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Georgesmith1975&oldid=1016455619"