User talk:Geolog10

Welcome!

Hello, Geolog10, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Geolog10. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by LouiseS1979 (talk) 20:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Question re access to Draft

After I log in, how do I easily access the submission I am working on (which page and which button?)Geolog10 (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One way is to click the link at the top right which says 'Contributions'. It will show you a list of all the pages you have edited. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 20:17, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

‎Need to see some current biographies (preferably scientists)

I'm not the person to help you on this, so I hope you asked several people.

I know absolutely nothing about how Wikipedia biographies of scientists are done.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:28, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which version of my submission am I supposed to edit?

Which version of all my drafts is the current one for me to continue editing? I've been adding minor formatting revisions, but now I'm not sure I am adding them to the current version. When I opened the last date, I got a message that says it is an old version. I can try them all until I don't get the message, but I'm sure there is some more efficient process.Geolog10 (talk) 20:14, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a problem. You should be able to access Draft:Florence Connolly Shipek by clicking on that link. The only way I can see you editing an old version is if you went to the history, accessed from "View history" or "history" at the top of the page. Some editors and bots have added categories and other essential items, and you wouldn't want to remove those by working on an old version. To be absolutely certain, go to the history and click on the last version. Clearing your cache is another solution but I don't remember how that's done.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:49, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Helpdesk MV reply

Hello, Geolog10. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#19:09:44.2C_25_December_2014_review_of_submission_by_Geolog10.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I think I messed something up in my new potential submission (Makeda Cheatom)--I can't get her name to show up at the top (in my Sandbox). As I was trying to drop the manuscript into the box, I deleted the programming at the top of the Sandbox. Could you add the programming back in, or should I go onto a new submission and copy the programming at the top? Geolog10Geolog10 (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Makeda Cheatom (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a press release for her ; see WP:NPOC Try rewriting it without adjectives and pyuffery like " She employs her entrepreneurial skills and indigenous intelligence to healing the world through music, art, dance, and culture."

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Makeda Cheatom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Makeda Cheatom, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geolog10! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What is the URL to see the status of the article I fixed after it was rejected? It is on Makada Cheatom.

Please help me with...

Geolog10 Geolog10 (talk) 20:29, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft is located at Draft:Makeda Cheatom. 331dot (talk) 20:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Makeda Cheatom concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Makeda Cheatom, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Makeda Cheatom

Hello, Geolog10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Makeda Cheatom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Makeda Cheatom (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

We need prose, please, not a set of lists. Your referencing scheme took a lot of work to create, built you have misunderstood. The citation itself is to be by the point cited. What you have done is achieved duplicating your list of references. I'm sorry this means changing your diligent work, but, since you will be redrafting the article, this is a great time to do this. I have not reviewed past these two points.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Makeda Cheatom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Makeda Cheatom, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 07:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Makeda Cheatom

Hello, Geolog10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Makeda Cheatom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

You have already created Draft:Makeda Cheatom - work on that draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Geolog10/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Geolog10/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 01:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do I delete the article in my sandbox so I can completely rewrite it from scratch? Geolog10 (talk) 17:38, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simply edit the page, select all of the text (Ctrl+A on Windows), delete it (backspace), and publish your changes. TG HL ↗ 18:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Makeda Cheatom has been accepted

Makeda Cheatom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 22:43, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. An edit you recently made to Saticoy, California seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 23:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody uses mealing anymore. You can leave it if you want. 2600:8801:802B:3900:79B9:98EC:BD8C:2B4E (talk) 23:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Geolog10. Thank you for your work on Richard Lee Bugbee. MtBotany, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Subject is notable, however there is a lack of references in many places in the article. If the references have not been added after six months to a year the unreferenced information should be removed. Thank you, though, for working on adding to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MtBotany}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

🌿MtBotany (talk) 23:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]