User talk:Geoffemerick

October 2017

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Geoff Emerick have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. LakesideMiners (talk) 12:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm geoff emerick

How is it promotional when I'm adding my website to my Wikipedia page do you understand I am Geoff Emerick Geoffemerick (talk) 12:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to debate this. Please use the article's talk page.LakesideMiners (talk) 13:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geoff Emerick page

I am trying to add the link to my website I am geoff Emerick what is the process?? Geoffemerick (talk) 23:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicts of interest

Hi Geoff. Please read the Wikipedia guide on conflicts of interest. If you would like a change made to an article and you are unsure of the process, please feel free to leave a comment on that article's talk page. Cheers, M.Clay1 (talk) 12:07, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rema management

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rema management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 21:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Zabaleta

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on William Zabaleta, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 06:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William zabaleta

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as William zabaleta, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:32, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William zabaleta moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, William zabaleta, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Daiyusha (talk) 07:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for lying about your identity (the operator of this account has previously claimed to be Geoff Emerick, but has continued to edit since Emerick's confirmed passing in 2018) and undisclosed paid editing (it seems likely that this account is being operated by a representative of Emerick's marketing company to add promotional content).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:50, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We do not block for extreme bad taste, but the use of a deceased person's identity for self-promotion is pretty egregious, so I am happy to say that there is ample reason to block this account beyond just this obnoxious behaviour. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:50, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]