User talk:Geo Lightspeed7

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Geo Lightspeed7

Thank you for creating Timothy J. Danis.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thank you! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 09:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OVERLINKING

Hi, thanks for your work, but PLEASE don't link common terms. See my edit. Tony (talk) 08:32, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Tony1. You’re welcome. Thank you for the constructive criticism. I was reluctant to do so, but I stared seeing a few other articles linking common terms, so I thought perhaps it was a new trend... Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 10:34, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we hope that by removing undesirable links it stops their spread. It's hard when almost every article translated from another language Wiki is a sea of blue. Tony (talk) 00:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Thanks @Tony1! I’ll definitely make sure not do to that from now on! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Geo Lightspeed7. Thank you for your work on Elmwood Casino. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article. You might want to consider moving the notable performers section to after the memorable engagements, and convert it to list form.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Onel5969:. Thank you very much! I agree that the notable performers should be converted to list form, and switching the format as you mentioned is a good idea, too. I will put it on my Wikipedia list of things to do. Thanks again! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 14:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Geo Lightspeed7. Thank you for your work on Milton Ebbins. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more articles!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @SunDawn:. You’re welcome and thank you! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 19:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elmwood Casino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Thank you @DPL bot. I just fixed it so it now goes to Tom Jones the singer. Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 13:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:James Dobson (actor)

Hello, Geo Lightspeed7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:James Dobson (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @FireflyBot. It’s already on mainspace. It might be an old draft. Thanks! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 20:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erin M. Jacobson (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Noahfgodard were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erin M. Jacobson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 19:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Noahfgodard. A couple of days ago, I took your advice and visited Teahouse for some insights and assistance from fellow editors for the article Draft:Erin M. Jacobson. Surprisingly, I did receive some sound counsel from a few experienced editors. They also did some major editing for me. A lot of it was cut out, revealing a more condensed version about the subject. When you have the time, I invite you to visit the resubmission for another look at a dramatically altered article. It has since fundamentally changed, hopefully for the better. Thank you @Noahfgodard! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 19:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geo Lightspeed7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noahfgodard (talk) 19:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Be brutal in your cuts

In my experienced opinion, Erin M. Jacobson will prove to be Wikipedia-notable, but you must be brutal in your cuts of content and references. What is needed is three or more references to published content ABOUT her, i.e., not just mentions that she had be or radio, or TV, or published something. For the same reason, I removed all the images of famous musicians she has represented, as notability is not contagious. What she has written about herself (social media, etc.) and interviews of her do not contribute to notability. Keep cutting until you have left the core of what makes her important to the entertainment industry. Once accepted, more can be added later. David notMD (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, @David notMD. Thanks for the advice, even though it’s not a pleasant experience to cut out so much... Should I just turn it into a STUB article for now and then go back later and add more noteworthy content to it if it gets published. Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 15:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there is enough for this to be Start. The Lead should be 2-3 paragraphs of summary type content, elaborated upon in the body of the article. David notMD (talk) 01:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @David notMD. I read your interesting bio. I, too, am interested in nutrition. I grow much of my own food. Anyhow, I will do my best to follow through with your new advice. Thank you again! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conversation re: Pat Kingsley etc moved

It's here: User talk:JSFarman/sandbox/Pat Kingsley JSFarman (talk) 01:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perry case?

The last two paragraphs of legal discussions is about a Perry case. Unless Jacobson was a lawyer for this case, her opinions about it - on Twitter, radio and her blog - do not belong in this article. David notMD (talk) 14:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @David notMD. No, she was not involved in that case from what I could find, except the radio station, but I could find no link to it online. I will remove it. Thanks! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 15:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Erin M. Jacobson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Erin M. Jacobson. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 20:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome and thank you @Noahfgodard. It has been a long process for sure. Okay...I can do that. Great idea regarding the comment in order to provide an easier way for reviewers...establishing notability. I will probably provide the comment sometime tomorrow after going through the article. Thanks for the invitation to contact you if I have any questions and to let you know when I’ve finished. Cheers! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 00:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Erin M. Jacobson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Erin M. Jacobson. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 20:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Noahfgodard. Thank you. I just looked at your comment. I was googling a few different phrases with her name in them and I began seeing some new articles. The “problem” that Jacobson has is so many reliably-sourced articles have been written by her. I will see what I can uncover... As far as the “shared pertinent perspectives,” I have been meaning to change it. I guess I now have some motivation to do so! Appreciate your help! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 21:04, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erin M. Jacobson (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

There is an item that militates against acceptance. You give WP:UNDUE to the Taylor Swift issue. Lawyers are hired to do a job, or offer their opinions in the press to increase their own revenue streams. The Swift material is, broadly, what Jacobon says. We have little to no interest in what she said. We are only interested in what is said about her, with significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.

Similarly we are not interested in that fact that she has written articles, unless people have recorded in the sources discussed previously significant coverage about those articles. With respect to Forbes, please read WP:FORBESCON.

Let me try to explain. If they manufactured vacuum cleaners, the cleaners would be their work. A vacuum cleaner could not be a reference for them, simply because it is the product they make. So it is with research, writings, etc. However, a review of their work by others tends to be a review of them and their methods, so is a reference, as is a peer reviewed paper a reference for their work.

In addition there are, in the same paragraph, two major examples of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.

Your approach now should be a substantial culling of material here, and judicious use of references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erin M. Jacobson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Timtrent. I apologize for the late reply. Thank you for your intelligent insight regarding the article. I will review and apply what you mentioned. I will try to work on it during the next week or so and resubmit it again. Thanks! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 23:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no deadline. Always remember that a reviewer is but one person and may not be 100% correc. It is advice, only. We try very hard to get it right, and usually manage. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay @Timtrent. Thank you! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 17:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Erin M. Jacobson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Erin M. Jacobson. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay @Timtrent. Thanks! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 23:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erin M. Jacobson has been accepted

Erin M. Jacobson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 00:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your hard work. Now I believe it will survive. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 00:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thank you very much for super speedy review of my resubmission, @Timtrent! Thank you for your compliment and encouragement, too! Have a great weekend! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 00:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Al Siegel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay @DPL bot. Thank you for fixing it! Geo Lightspeed7 (talk) 10:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elmwood Casino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]