User talk:Gekkotan

One of my current things is Draft:PKS 2131-021

Your submission at Articles for creation: PKS 2131-021 (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

poorly written.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PKS 2131-021 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PKS 2131-021, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gekkotan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still poorly written

What you have written is a mishmosh of sentence fragments that make no sense. Revise to simple sentences. Part of the problem: "Later Aalto University spots movement in stars considering them a "black hole" soon after teams of scientist later see if it is a black hole, New York LIGO detected it an astrophysicist named Chiara Mingarelli.[5] is currently studying it."

David notMD (talk) 09:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diary of a Minecraft Zombie (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diary of a Minecraft Zombie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Diary of a Minecraft Zombie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Pbrks ^(t • c) 17:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

Re: your recent edit to the article on unincorporated area: "Brdy" is a Czech placename, not a typo for "Brady". In Dutch, "IJ" is considered a letter of its own, and thus Dutch words can in fact begin with a capital "IJ" instead of "Ij". And the Ministry of Defence (Slovakia) uses the British spelling rather than the American - see the English version of their logo on the ministry's site. DS (talk) 15:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deuterium - Neutron Fusion moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Deuterium - Neutron Fusion, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 13:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deuterium–neutron fusion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deuterium–neutron fusion. Thanks! · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 18:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deuterium–neutron fusion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deuterium–neutron fusion. Thanks! · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 18:58, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deuterium–neutron fusion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deuterium–neutron fusion. Thanks! · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 19:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deuterium–neutron fusion (March 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Pbsouthwood was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Content appears to be incoherent nonsense.

· · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 19:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Cyclone Gombe

On 19 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cyclone Gombe, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 01:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Diary of a Minecraft Zombie

Hello, Gekkotan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Diary of a Minecraft Zombie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.