Jump to content

User talk:Gedgmoss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion nomination of Car house

[edit]

Hello Gedgmoss,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Car house for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jianhui67 (talk) 12:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Gedgmoss! Your additions to King Edward VI Grammar School, Retford have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lithopsian (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).== Retford king edward vi grammar school moved to draftspace ==

An article you recently created, Retford king edward vi grammar school, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit (blether) 13:38, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback, I am compiling several sources and adding them I hope according to your advice. Gedgmoss (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC) G.Moss Gedgmoss (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Gedgmoss! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Retford king edward vi grammar school has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Retford king edward vi grammar school. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:51, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, very sorry, but I've read the suggested document, in fact I had already, and many of it's subsiduary links, but still not clear exactly what is still required.

I have more links to add, but reluctant to do so if I have not addressed you previous concerns? I'd like to get the basics right first. Sorry for being a slow learner!

Ged


Did this question receive a reply? Gedgmoss (talk) 10:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC) G MossGedgmoss (talk) 10:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:1931 School Handbook.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:1931 School Handbook.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:31, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2019. Trying to understand what to do next to article Draft:Retford King Edward VI Grammar School - whether it is likely to be rejected again or I am wasting my time?? Gedgmoss (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC) G Moss Gedgmoss (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Retford King Edward VI Grammar School has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Retford King Edward VI Grammar School. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I've tried to address at least 2 of your suggestions and left a question regarding the list/prose Gedgmoss (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2019 (UTC)GedGedgmoss (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Gedgmoss. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Worldbruce (talk) 14:40, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retford King Edward VI Grammar School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hasteur (talk) 20:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gedgmoss (talk) 22:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Ged[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]