User talk:Gdo01/Archive/Archive 01

Vandalism

Thank you for experimenting with the page Nonoffensive on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -Nonoffensive 18:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Put in by a vandal. Gdo01 19:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Nonoffensive 19:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother Pete Bennett

Please justify your reversion of my edit which was both verifiable and noteworthy leaky_caldron 20:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alfredo

Sorry

Hi Geraldo Im Alfredo and I wrote Kevin Smith is a fat ass on the magnolia article. Thanks for deleting it and Im sorry for writing. And by the way you found it 2 minutes after I wrote it.You are good.

Challange

Hi Geraldo I think what you do is great and I challange you to delete the things Im about to do to some articles. Every article that I vandalise would have your name Geraldo. It's just for fun. So let's start NOW. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) .

Geraldo forget the contest thing I was blocked.Im sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 07:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Block Alfredo!

Interesting that Alfredo would show up on your user page. Of the very few articles I watch, he keeps vandalizing four of them--he repeatedly adds and re-adds images with no copyright information. On the Chas Tenenbaum and Royal Tenenbaum pages, for instance, he has now re-added the same images three times after they've been removed by OrphanBot. --Miss Dark 03:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sceptile and leaky_caldron

HOW DARE YOU! Deleting what I added about that losser PS. please replie to sceptile -posted at 17:14 EST on July 30, 2006 by SceptileSceptile

I made the edit. Whoever left the above did not and is probably trying to cause mischief leaky_caldron 21:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I was about to delete the Halo 2 vandalism on Games Considered the Worst Ever Page, but I saw you already did that. Thank you for trying to help maintain the integrity of the article. guitarhero777777 02:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

anonymous editer

hello Gdo01, i was only warning that anoymous editer to stop reverting that article. i think that halo 2 is a GREAT game and i do not find it verry funny at all. thats all. many thanks Touth 02:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your welcome! many thanks my friend. happy editing Touth 03:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

hey the person from this ip 24.60.89.199, tried to add some non sens to the cosmo and wanda article. I noticed you told them before thought i'd run it by you. ChicanoJ 04:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Gdo01! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe 's talk 15:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken vandalism

I am not the original owner of this IP address, my ISP just assigns them randomly. I have checked the vandalism warning from False Prophet, which applies to the former owner of this IP address. According to Wikipedia's definition of vandalism: "Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content, made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia.", the modifications by the former owner of the IP address were actually not vandalism since they did not compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia. I do not believe the changes to be much of importance, but I do believe it was not vandalism. I do not know if it is possible to do so, but since I'm the new owner of the IP, I therefore request the removal of that warning. Why not asking False Prophet? The reason is simple: he is in vacation and you have posted on my user talk.

24.37.160.221 05:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad link in your User talk page

The "Report one" link at the top of your talk page seems not to be a valid link. 24.37.160.221 05:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-edit: The link must be changed from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Gdo01&action=edit§ion=new to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gdo01&action=edit&section=new 24.37.160.221 06:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thank you.--Gdo01 06:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you were faster than me on typing that one. =P Have a nice day!--24.37.160.221 06:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FLCL

As a userbox fan of FLCL, would you be willing to vote for its nomination at Wikipedia's Article Improvement Drive? If elected, it will be the subject of a week-long overhaul, in an attempt to pass in to Featured Article status! Thanks, Litefantastic 17:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bleach Arc names

Do what you like. I'm currently going through the article history to figure out exactly who it was that invented those arc names in the first place. --tjstrf 22:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, as it turns out, it was Ynhockey. [1] I agree with the Soul Society arc name, but think the early story would best be called that: Early story or beginning, or something similar. --tjstrf 22:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Taepodong-1

To my knowledge, I have not added anything to the Taepodong-1 page, let alone even viewed it. What happened?--64.12.122.195 21:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiflaws:

I would like to interview you for an article. Would you accept? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.65.75.224 (talk • contribs) .

IP address 72.181.73.209 has recently made vandalism to the Brownsville, Texas website (again, I removed it), and to the University of Texas at Brownsville website by calling the president "Tia Caca" (removed by me, as well).

I am not sure who I should report this to, bit i figure if I do it to you, it might be just as efficient. --Mcamargo 15:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Peretz

For your info, 67.190.106.134 put the same nonsense into the above article three times after you reverted it, and Tawkerbot2 reverted it each time. Those last three times were after you posted the warning on his/her talk page. I am sure there is a place to report this activity, but I do not know where. 6SJ7 17:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page, regards, --Ali K 06:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of edits to The Colbert Report recurring elements

The revert you made to The Colbert Report recurring elements was clearly not a reversion of vandalism. While the anon contributions may not be worthy of including in the article, they certainly do not meet the criteria for Vandalism.–RHolton ≡– 10:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

V for Vendetta (film)

Thanks for correcting the pt-interwiki link. I'm running a Interwiki BOT and always have problems with these wrong links. --Meisam.fa 19:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barrington Nova Scotia Possible Vandalism

Possible Vandalism on Barrington, Nova Scotia that you reversed was revandalize by user:89.213.1.100 on August 3,2006 .I reverted the edit .--Bill 23:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AWB

Hi Gdo01, just reminding you of an AWB rule:

Avoid making insignificant minor edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag, converting some HTML to Unicode, removing underscores from links (unless they are bad links), or something equally trivial. This is because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists.

See you around! —Mets501 (talk) 15:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Yorzan.JPG)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yorzan.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

8th mistake.

The edit I made to the Hungarian Bridge page was not vandalism, nor uneeded. It is factual information, which most likely was the cause for the entire revision of the vote. --Real tymer 21:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but I thought I made it pretty clear the Colbert himself disaproved of the ballot stuffing. --Real tymer 21:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline Personality Disorder

It does look like vandalism, but if you look at the talk page for BPD (the section about Famous Borderline Personalities), you'll see why the user removed the section--which was only added yesterday and was immediately debated. The section's really weak. --Miss Dark 04:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Northern M0 Danube bridge

Not used to having my images reverted before I even finish uploading them. The Colbert Report is certainly responsible for the vast majority of the buzz about the M0 bridge, so a screenshot seems reasonable. Could I at least ask that you use an edit summary in the future, instead of anti-vandalism programs? savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 05:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, its all good now. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 05:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anon user being a vandal again

I found and reverted edits by [[2]] at this page: [3]. Just thought I should point this out, since I noticed the user has been a vandal on many occasions. RobJ1981 04:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George Bush

It was sarcasm. I used the same words he did to make a point that just because he says something, it doesn't make it a fact. Didn't you catch that? 2nd Piston Honda 06:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Terrence Malick page

Hi Gdo01-

I've been in a revert war with a group of individuals (many editing behind IP adresses) at the Terrence Malick page. I was wondering if you could refer me to an administrator/moderator who can sort this out, if you yourself aren't one already?

-Thanks, --Kitrus 20:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

I didn't add any non-sense to wikipedia. 75.2.247.21 22:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama

It is a fact that Bobby Rush accused white politicians of being racist for supporting Barack Obama. 75.2.247.21 22:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Special thanks to you for your efforts in fighting the recent outbreak of vandalism on the Barack Obama article. There is a newly posted proposal at the bottom of the article's talk page to put the article under semi-protect status. Given that the article appears to be closely watched, I hope that this will not be necessary, as at least some "drive-by" edits are helping to improve the article. But as you have been doing most of the heavy lifting, I think your opinion carries important weight and I encourage you to express it on the talk page. Thanks again. --HailFire 09:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:64.12.116.195

Good luck in getting this user blocked. It's a shared AOL IP and the blocks usually only last a few hours or so. --Bobblehead 04:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your threats

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --RCT 20:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Boondocks

"# (cur) (last) 02:28, 3 September 2006 Gdo01 (Talk | contribs | block) m (rv this is for recurring and main characters not one time characters)

(cur) (last) 02:27, 3 September 2006 WhisperToMe (Talk | contribs | block) (→Characters)"

Then I'm making a place for one time characters. The one time characters HAVE to be listed somewhere. WhisperToMe 15:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Human rights and Social justice

Pro-choice being considered human rights or social justice is a matter of opinion, it does not belong on wikipedia. Please remove those categories from the article. 75.3.50.41 02:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I answer that? I do not think genocide should be put in, I think Social justice and Human rights should removed, because that is opinion and it is bias to include them but not include the views of others. Wikipedia articles are not the place for you to express your personal beliefs. 75.3.50.41 02:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that human rights be kept, social justice removed. That the pro-choice movement aims to grant people additional freedom, hence additional rights, can be asserted regardless of one's personal POV. The social justice category, however, makes a value judgment about the subject. --tjstrf 03:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert you POV change to my section in the Path to 9/11

Jeff Trattner 05:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jeff Trattner 05:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Edwards article

You made an edit to my work on the John Edwards page, that is factually incorrect. I have reverted your mistake there is no need to thank me. You can review your obvious mistake here: [4]. Unfortunately, you might be confused about President Bush's position on stem cell research because most newspaper and TV reporters either do not know what they are talking about OR they are biased and they know the truth, but refuse to report it properly. We all know that Bush opposes embryonic stem cell research. But what most people don't know is that Bush supports adult stem cell research and cord blood stem cell research. Bush is the first President of the U.S. that signed a bill funding embryonic stem cell research. As a matter of fact, President Clinton is the President that signed the law to ban the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research. Yes, I know that if you read the popular press you would get a different point of view. But it just is not so. Please review the Stem Cell page for more information. Have a good day.--Getaway 02:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reversion of super star destroyer article

(cur) (last) 02:21, 15 September 2006 Gdo01 (Talk | contribs) (Revert to the revision prior to revision 75810590 dated 2006-09-15 02:04:21 by 70.226.92.185 using popups

not an instance of vandalism... updated according the book of the star wars universeLocriani 06:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

looked at edit logs... partially correct. your reversion included some numbers that i did not edit, go figure? Locriani 06:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

actually, you were right about the numbers. no idea how that got changed... the only changes i made were to the designations "night hammer" and "knight hammer" perhaps a previous user? unfortunately, i don't have immediate access to the correct numbers... only the designations.Locriani 06:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

haha... unfortunate coincidence. at least it was easily resolved.Locriani 06:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove nonsense

I thought this edit summary was amusing, given the nature of the article. Perhaps I don't take life seriously enough. Stephen B Streater 09:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYROM and EU

U are right. it was not making any sense. i re-worded it. do not revert pls. the EU uses only this name and this is the only name under which this country degotiates with EU. thanks for the notice. Hectorian 23:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Americanism

Don't you think that we need to balance this article back to a NPOV. It's full of crap that no one really thinks / does. I just wanna make sure that if people look at this, they won't think that our nation is crap. You know what I mean? (LonghornJohnny 18:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

What I meant to say is that the article suggests that Anti-Americanism is right. I wanted to make sure that people will see that yes it's there, but it is not right. So I added a few good things about America in there but it's gone now. (LonghornJohnny 18:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for the advice. I just came across this article though and did not have a lot of research done. I agree that a Criticism part should be included however. But it will be tough to keep it, since mostly real anti-american people write this article. :) Thanks again, will try to have it nicely sourced. (LonghornJohnny 18:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

olbermann

It showcases just how sharp his criticism of those he opposes is--Bairdso66 22:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete my signature

Please do not delete my signature when I add it to a post I forgot to sign. such action may be considered vandalism. Thanks. Lolakitty 02:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

White and Nerdy Lyrics

Oh...sorry about that. I didn't know. Baseracer 02:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC) MagicKirin[reply]

ANSWER

You keep removing my edit which is backed up.

Please stop

MagicKirin 20:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)MagicKirinMagicKirin 20:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for October 2nd.


Volume 2, Issue 40	2 October 2006	About the Signpost

New speedy deletion criteria added	News and notes
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	RSS Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic Records

DOn't worry man, I usually don't vandalize, heck, I got Vandalproof and two barnstars! I just am a big "Weird Al" Yankovic fan, I just bought Straight Outta Lynwood, and I saw the music video, and I just had to, come on, it is very tempting! :) Karrmann 01:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Butters

You’re right. It's not important at all. In fact, it's trivial! Hey, what section of the article did I put that trivial piece of information in again?

Don’t worry. I won’t put it back in the article, but I still think it was a relevant contribution. Xargon666x6 20:09, 03 October 2006

Sigma Pi Phi Article

Individuals by the SN of Robotam, and MrDarcy have made large wholescale changes and vandalisms on the page. The original article dated sept 25 has had no changes until october 3rd [5]. The change was reverted and they were told to bring it to the talk section. The response was to revert back . numerous times. Please provide assistance. 64.12.117.9 02:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sigma_Pi_Phi&diff=79383124&oldid=79380789

apolitical??

Olbermann's "worst person" honorees are apolitical??? I think not, it is a forum to bash conservatives--Bairdso66 00:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunatley, I do watch the left-wing zealot on occasion and he does NOT crticize liberal politicians or commentators and if you watch him as you claim you would know Edward R. Olbemann's left-leaning ways on his "worst person" segment and otherwise--Bairdso66 00:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do watch him( I don't hear from other people, ao I resent the accusation), but I will leave it alone, I am just dissapointed that people are sugarcoating his bias, that's all...thanks for taking the time to respond--Bairdso66 00:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Cats

Can you have a category such as [[Category:Fruits]] on images? I don't think so, but I wanted to make sure...Aqua fish talk 01:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:206.225.97.94

Hi, I changed your addition of {{test}} on User talk:206.225.97.94 to {{verror}}, let me know if that's a problem. Cheers, Vectro 20:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube

Oh. Sorry my bad, I saw that you removed a true fact (after some research) and so reverted it. Typer525 ^Talk 04:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for October 9th.


Volume 2, Issue 41	9 October 2006	About the Signpost

Interview with Board member Erik Möller	Wall Street Journal associates Wikipedia with Grupthink
Account used to create paid corporate entries shut down	Report from the Portuguese Wikipedia
News and notes	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kira Nerys

Is there a wiki article on the mirror Kira? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you'd like to start one? Or maybe there needs to be a Mirror Kira section of the Kira article? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted...

I see you've been removing some instances of one of my bugaboos -- "it should be noted". It should be noted that I appreciate the effort. It should also be noted that there are something like 16,000 of them in Wikipedia, maybe 10,000 of which are in the main namespace. Sometimes seems to me that we've got a lot of editors who don't know the difference between an essay and an encyclopedia entry... --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 00:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Make Love, Not Warcraft

You participated in defense of this article's original content. This is just to let you know that a small group of editors has gutted the article, and due to the ensuing edit war, the article has been protected and a RFC has been issued. You may wish to return to the article and leave your two cents. - 66.93.144.171 01:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle moore

I've removed the name from AIV, as it is not Michael Moore. Figured I'd tell you. Alphachimp 00:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Keep up the good work. Alphachimp 00:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Loose Change - Popular Mechanics Video Links

Thanks for changing the links I added to the same content with better titles. I didn't notice the titles so I'm glad you found better links -- it was the content I found compelling. Cheers, -Quasipalm 05:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Batman quote

See WP:REF, Section 5. Glad to hear somebody knew the source! Cribcage 02:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for October 16th.


Volume 2, Issue 42	16 October 2006	About the Signpost

Wikipedia partially unblocked in mainland China	$100 million copyright fund stems discussion
Floyd Landis adopts "the Wikipedia defense" as appeal strategy	News and notes: Logo votes begin, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:HomeComputer

cool, thank you. —ptk✰fgs 07:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Colbert Report

Your recent edit [6] looks like vandalism and I'm just asking for an explanation. You seem to be a good user with no history of vandalism yet you added this uncited claim that looks very much like the vandalism that occured on the elephant page. Gdo01 19:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just having some fun Gdo01. I was hoping to put some of the elephant nonsense on Colbert's page. Sorry to be a pain. Publicus 19:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping to use the cover of my username to sneak one in there. Everyone knows to watch out for the IP edits. :) Publicus 19:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vendetta

Thanks for the heads up. It's rather surprising to me that it is this particular IP is the one getting so worked up. After all, I only gave them a 3 hour block. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 23:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

edits to Mike Malloy

Hello Gdo01 - I see you have been try to address the edits of User:Capsource1 to the Mike Malloy page. I have as well, and have run up to my 3R limit. Are you an administrator? If not, I believe we have reached the point that it would be beneficial to involve one. Or if that's not the right procedure, please tell me what is, as I have never been in a revert conflict before. Debivort 00:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bleach and Jump superlative Stars

I agree that the mentions should be consistent, but I think that having them is important. Not important to the characters themselves in an in-universe sense, but in an external, establishing notability sense, it may be. Inclusion in the Jump superlative Stars games is a sign of an important character not simply within an individual series, but within manga as a whole. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 18:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby World Cup

Quick work -- you reverted my mistake before I could! Cheers, Vectro 01:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism for Paul Hindemith

You indicated that the article for Paul Hindemith is okay. I have closed down my browser, cleared all my memory, cache, cookies, etc.. IF you read the first two lines of the article for Paul Hindemith the vandalism is still there even though the BOT shows that it removed the sentence. [7]. Your refresh suggest didn't work. --CyclePat 03:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for October 23rd.


Volume 2, Issue 43	23 October 2006	About the Signpost

Report from the Finnish Wikipedia	News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What?

This was a dummy edit intended to get the attention of an admin in RC. --172.193.49.5 00:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poke. --172.193.49.5

Yes, I assumed you were running multiple things at once. I figured inasmuch that they would prevent you from recieving messages, as some programs don't purge pages that often and prevent users from getting messages for some time. --172.193.49.5 00:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vastro Lorde

Actually, we have seen a depiction of a Vastro Lorde before. Chapter 197, page 16. [8] The helmet of the silhouette looks identical to Ulquiorra's. –Gunslinger47 04:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFd

In response to Your afd entry is formatted wrong and is interfering with the afd above it. It makes it seem like you voted to delete the Colbert Report entry when you are voting to delete the other article.

Sorted it. I think it's OK now. Cheers. Arcturus 20:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a bot?

You seem really fast... even faster than the normal bot around here -- 142.33.70.36 18:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, you beat my test to make sure AVB was actually responding.... wow -- Tawker 18:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for October 30th.


Volume 2, Issue 44	30 October 2006	About the Signpost

Wales resigns chair position as reorganization underway	Hypothetical valuation of Wikipedia scrutinized
Work underway to purge plagiarized text from articles	Librarian creates video course about Wikipedia
Report from the Japanese Wikipedia	News and notes: Commemorative mosaic started, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What! No barnstar yet?

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		High time you were awarded one for all the RC patrolling. Long may you keep it up! LittleOldMe 18:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

just an idea

I was looking through the history of one of the Lost pages and noticed one of your recent reversions - it wasn't to mine, but I wanted to make a suggestion. When I see something that needs a cite, I just put in ^{[citation needed]}, and it puts a marker saying "Citation needed" - this seems to me to be more constructive than just a blanket RV. I don't know what the official rule is, but putting a marker for a citation alerts the community that something needs to either be cited or removed, and then remove it in a couple weeks if nobody has come forth with a cite. I just think that if new users are making efforts that aren't quite right, it would be better to be polite and note what can be made better than just erasing it, so they don't get discouraged or offended. Riverbend 18:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Mark Wahlberg; Static (Bleach album); Jack Plotnick; Edgar Stiles; Dave Jeser; Bleach bypass; Ultimate Fantastic Four; Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa; Fumiko Orikasa; Tite Kubo; Matt Silverstein; Rita Cosby; Yuuka Nanri; Katrina Holden Bronson; Starvin' Marvin; Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa; Masakazu Morita; Playboy; Gimli (Middle-earth)

Cleanup: Criticism of Family Guy; ASEAN Free Trade Area; Minas Tirith
Merge: Urahara Shōten; Wayne Enterprises; Mondegreen
Add Sources: King of the Hill; Sabre Dance; The Da Vinci Code (film)
Wikify: Pundit (politics); Nationalization; Colourisation
Expand: Demographic history of the United States; Travis Mayweather; Haber process

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 01:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 6th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 45	6 November 2006	About the Signpost

Arbitration election campaigns begin	Blogger studies Wikipedia appearance in search results
Intelligence wiki receives media attention	Report from the German Wikipedia
News and notes: Foundation donation, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek depictions

Your artistic renditions of Kira and Sisko are appreciated but how do they help the article? According to WP:Images, an image should be "relevant to the article they appear in and be of sufficient notability (relative to the article's topic)." The images you placed were just fan art done by yourself. I know you are an admin but I still do not see any rationale for fan art done by the user themselves should be on an encyclopedic page. Gdo01 00:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They weren't by me. The reason I included them is because they are free license images, as opposed to the fair use images already present. -- Zanimum 16:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My bad

My bad. Mak (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Gates

Dr. Gates is NOT yet the Secretary of Defense; he has been nominated by President Bush. He will not be Secretary until and unless confirmed by the Senate. --Mhking 18:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair deal; I was trying to figure out who went nuts with the infobox. No worries. --Mhking 18:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert rule

Hey, I'm not sure this is the place where to reach you.

I got a cuple of messages from you telling me to stop editing pages. What's the deal with that?

What happened is the following: I edited one page to make a link and then the link page. Then the page got deleted twice, and all I did is replace the stuff I wrote on it. Is that against the rules? What-s the logic behind that? Anyway, why are YOU telling me what to do?

Again, I'm not sure how this goes so please explain me what's going on. thanks. User:barbabarba

Please see WP:3RR. Basically you can only revert to your version of an article three times. The purpose of this is to restrict edit wars like the one that is occurring on your page and Borat. Gdo01 07:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok thanks, but I still don't understand the following: 1-what would you recomment then? I made a page with NEW info that others might find useful (which is the purpose of the whole site) and this guys keep deleting it and redirecting it to the page I stemmed it from, for no good reason (he just deletes the info I edited, he doesn't include them where he claims they should be instead).

Ok, thanks for the explaination, I appreciate the work and effort. I guess I won't be editing that info again since it seems it'a nich nich.

V for Vendetta as an anti-modernist film

I have put the following message on the V for Vendetta discussion section, concerning your question regarding the suppose anti-modernism in V for Vendetta:

Someone asked me why V for Vendetta is a anti-modernist film, since I put that term as a category. Here is my opinion.

I believe that even though the plot of this movie is set in a futuristic society, its argument is a clear protest on how society is developing. It is not only just a warning; it is also a critique on the ways things are being conducted in the present time. I mean, it is clear the connections concerning America and its suppose propaganda machine. Even if you don't accept that connection as clear, you have to understand, as it is part of the own plot, that there is a reference to the media as being use to fool people. Please discuss.Maziotis 11:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:V_for_Vendetta_%28film%29"

Raviraj

When listing deaths under current events: "Do not list the ordinary deaths of prominent persons here. That's what Recent deaths is for. Exceptions to this rule are made for persons of extreme prominence, such as Ronald Reagan, John Paul II, or the Queen Mother." Raviraj does not meet the criteria of extreme prominence. KazakhPol 05:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:WTF

hey thats my brother mind your own business you jerk —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lman1987 (talk • contribs) .

Hi Gerardo. I moved Xtremeblur's user page back, and then deleted it per their request. I think it is over, but if you see anything else happen, please let me know. Good work. ×Meegs 09:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 13th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 46	13 November 2006	About the Signpost

Full accessibility, dramatic growth reported for Chinese Wikipedia	ArbCom elections: Information on Elections
Report identifies Wikipedia as a leader in non-US traffic	News and notes: Board passes four resolutions, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Pelosi Vandalism

I have recently reverted yet another act of vandalism directed at the Nancy Pelosi article. Based upon the article's edit history, I noticed that you have reverted vandalism in the article more than once in the last day. Considering the recent spike in vandalism, would a request for page protection be in order? I would make the request myself, but unfortunately, I am unfamiliar with the procedure for making a request. --TommyBoy 18:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for following up on my request so quickly. --TommyBoy 19:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

WP:AIV: I tried to revert myself, but you did first. The history kept staying the same no matter how many times I used popups, I tried refreshing my browser cache, but it still didn't change, so I decided to do it manually. It then turned out the popups did work, so I had already reverted it, but I did an extra revert, which took place slightly after you reported a user, thusly, I accidentally reverted you. That will most likely be the most confusing thing you will ever hear. —The Gr e at Llama ^talk 20:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Would you like your user page semi-protected? _JD^talk 17:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've semi-protected your user page. _JD^talk 17:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was handling a persistent IP vandal so I couldn't respond earlier. Gdo01 17:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage spamming

Thanks for reverting that. I already reported that guy- he has a history of talkpage spamming, personal attacks (he told me to go play in the road, but I'm too old for that!), and some blocks for incivility. I'm hoping this will be an indefinite ban. Nwwaew(My talk page) 13:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is odd! I put his username in, and it comes back with another username. Looks like he used some sort of characters not shown there. Nwwaew(My talk page) 13:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My bad- I went to a Special page. Anyway, hes been blocked again for 24 hours, and there was an autoblock on his IP, also. Nwwaew(My talk page) 13:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gdo01

After a mounth, I discovered what is my error editing the "Weird Al" Yankovic article. The added content was a mistake - I was editing and translating the portuguese article, and the translation goes to the wrong place... That was not a proprosital vandalism. Sorry! --Gabriel de Oliveira Padoan 15:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

W. S. Gilbert

Thanks for helping out against vandals during our time on the front page! Adam Cuerden ^talk 19:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re Wikipedians by number of edits

Thanks for the note Gdo01. -- Szvest → ^{Wiki Me Up ®} 14:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Xtacles

Re: Frisky Dingo, the Xtacle's paycheck in episode 5 is written out to "Xtacle Leroy." An on-screen spelling is canonical, the website is not. Rob T Firefly 22:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 20th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 47	20 November 2006	About the Signpost

One week later, Wikipedia reblocked in mainland China	Military history dominates writing contest
News and notes: Wikibooks donation, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 27th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 48	27 November 2006	About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections: Candidate profiles	Steward elections begin
Group apologizes for using Wikipedia name in online arts fundraiser	News and notes: 1.5 million articles, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted my "preceded by" statement.

I thought that although this was an unrelated series, since it is still a Batman series, it can be linked to the previous films in that box just stating that it is not in the same continuity. And I did do that with the 66 and 89 film. What's wrong with that? Superstooge 23:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for December 4th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 49	4 December 2006	About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections open	The Seigenthaler incident: One year later
Wikimedia celebrates Commons milestone, plans fundraiser	Wikipedia wins award in one country, reported blocked in another
News and notes: Steward elections continue, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Hey there! I saw you reverting or removing linkspam. Thanks! If you're interested, come visit us in Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam so we can work together in our efforts to clean spam from Wikipedia. Hu12 06:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with the MAD reference?

What makes a reference to MAD Magazine any less significant that The Simpsons, Family Guy, The Muppets, or Superman? Why don't these references get removed as well? billdescoteaux 22:00, 05 December 2006 (PST)

Thank you

Thank you for your message, I'm appreciate it. ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 18:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought it was Constipated as I downloaded it under that name. It is indeed "A complicated song"...

nobel Prize

You reverted my edit regarding Jimmy Carter's reason for winning the Nobel peace. As the commitee chair stated we did it to kick George Bush in the shins and the failure of the IAEA will you reconsider your edit? Decato 22:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I have nothing to do with black toast music, I merely posted the article in an attempt to help other people who had searched everywhere for the songs I referenced and the only name that ever came up on google searches was theirs but no website. I didn't think this was against Wiki's rules sry if it is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Leefy06 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 8 December 2006.

Lyrics

Are you serious? You actually think he can sue Wikipedia for including an external link? He does not exactly control the internet. He does not really work for the Government of Kazakhstan, you understand...? KazakhPol 04:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. I disagree with the policy though. KazakhPol 04:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deleting all fact and opinion

You said that my post about Pelosi was condescending and deleted the entire post. The post contained fact about how she condescends to an entire country by saying that none of us can impeach if she doesn't want to. Please only delete the part that you find problematic, not the entire post. Pco 00:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You accuse me of vandalism for posting this??????????

Pelosi plans to continue funding the Iraq War [3] http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16057734

and has informed the country that "impeachment is off the table". http://ori.msnbc.msn.com/id/15638502/ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16116357/

Pco 02:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for December 11th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 50	11 December 2006	About the Signpost

From the editor: New feature
Board of Trustees expanded as three new members are appointed	Wikimedia Foundation releases financial audit
Arbitration Committee elections continue, extra seat available	Female-only wiki mailing list draws fire
Trolling organization's article deleted	WikiWorld comic: "Redshirt"
News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Posting a link to places to live on a city-page shouldn't be considered bad. That's on topic-- the people going to that page want to know about Gainesville. So what's up with that? Also, I think that No Idea Records should be allowed-- that's one of Gainesville's only indie record labels (though I didn't add that one). It's no more commercial than the links to the radio stations.

Request for comments on the Keith Ellison (politician) page

As you have contributed in the past to the Keith Ellison page I notify you of a current request for comments on that page. Your input would be helpful.

Talk:Keith Ellison (politician) This is a dispute about where in the article about US Rep. Keith Ellison’s (first Muslim in Congress) ties with the Nation of Islam should be discussed. Whether since they were in the past they can be consigned to a segment enumerating the year of their maximum impact or if such enumerating lessens their impact which is held to be ongoing.07:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 51	18 December 2006	About the Signpost

From the editor: Holiday publication
Elections conclude, arbitrators to be chosen	Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser opens
WikiWorld comic: "Dr. Seuss"	News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for December 26th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 52	26 December 2006	About the Signpost

Seven arbitrators chosen	Wikipedia classroom assignments on the rise
WikiWorld comic: "Molasses"	News and notes: Stewards appointed, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 1	2 January 2007	About the Signpost

Effort to modify fair use policy aborted	Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
WikiWorld comic: "Thagomizer"	News and notes: Fundraiser continues, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 2	8 January 2007	About the Signpost

Special: 2006 in Review	Another newspaper columnist found to have plagiarized Wikipedia
Blogs track attempts to manipulate articles	Nutritional beef cooks PR editor
WikiWorld comic: "Facial Hair"	News and notes: Fundraiser continues, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 3	15 January 2007	About the Signpost

Special: 2006 in Review, Part II	New arbitrators interviewed
Cascading protection feature added	WikiWorld comic: "Apples and Oranges"
News and notes: Fundraiser breaks $1,000,000, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]