User talk:GayOrdinaryChristian

September 2019

Hello, I'm Creffett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Leviticus 18, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. creffett (talk) 00:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. creffett (talk) 00:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please use reliable sources. www.gaychristian101.com is not a reliable source. its a self-publishing source.--SharabSalam (talk) 00:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

There is no "bias message"--consider "biased message". Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The biased message is "Every place it is mentioned it is referred to in a negative light. The teaching from the Scriptures are clearly against homosexual behavior of any kind." It is someone's interpretation and opinion that "the teaching from the Scriptures are clearly against homosexual behavior of any kind." In my opinion and interpretation the scriptures doesn't prohibit homosexuality. But I do not display my opinion as fact on Wikipedia. 01:20, User:GayOrdinaryChristian 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, but blah blah blah. "Bias message" is improper English. I'm glad you said "biased message" in your response. Drmies (talk) 00:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, GayOrdinaryChristian, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SharabSalam (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doc James can I use this source? is this high quality? If so, why? Thank you https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28353648 01:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

MDPI

Has been listed as a predatory publisher and thus not a suitable source either. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This source is too old. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2571445

The sources also do not appear to mention UTIs? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by tagging and WP:OR

When you add maintenance templates to an article, as you did at Salvation in Christianity diff diff, Ethics in the Bible diff, and Women in the Bible diff, please provide a rationale at the talk. And this, at The Bible and slavery, adding a tag that more secondary citations are needed diff, and then next interpreting a primary source, which is WP:OR, is not very constructive either. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming it's not the leads you're thinking of, see WP:LEADCITE? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: I don't know; it's just not clear to me why those tags were added. No rationale was provided. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the indent, Joshua Jonathan, question was for GOC, based on edits like [1]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]