User talk:Gaurakshat1

This is Gaurakshat1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utkarsh Sharma (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Utkarsh Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Utkarsh Sharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gaurakshat1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utkarsh Sharma (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://wikibio.in/utkarsh-sharma/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Utkarsh Sharma may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 15:43, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Nirmika Singh.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Nirmika Singh.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Utkarsh Sharma

Your draft version of Utkarsh Sharma was in a state of being rejected as you have provided all the irrelevant references. Moreover the language was not proper. I reworked on our draft, added valid references and corrected it. So in spite of being thankful you are saying I am claiming the draft to be mine. I have added the draft in my list to keep tack of it. So please be polite and generous while choosing your words. Risu43 (talk) 08:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay apologies, my bad, I didnt know that you had made those changes thanks alot, can you also help me with the following article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nirmika_Singh

AfC notification: Draft:Utkarsh Sharma has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Utkarsh Sharma. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utkarsh Sharma (September 18)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Utkarsh Sharma|cv=no|reason=npov|details=|reason2=|details2=|comment=On looking at this again, I see: "He has a photogenic memory and high IQ" in the voice of Wikipedia. This means that this draft was written to praise him rather than describing him neutrally.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gaurakshat1 (talk) 10:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The reason stated by you to decline the article was that it was writter, He has a photogenic memory and high IQ, but you did not check the whole paragraph it clearly states the following Utkarsh character in the movie Genius (2018 film) is an orphan from Mathura and Vrindavan area in Uttar Pradesh, who lives with priests. He has a photogenic memory and high IQ. He is into Bhagavad Gita and science so has his own unique philosophy. This is not to praise utkarhs but showcases the character he plays in the movie, I am resubmitting the article hope it gets approved this time.

Question

You wrote, in an edit summary: "Edited out the line in life and career which said that Utkarsh's Character in the movie has high IQ, I don't understand how that is supposed to be a problem but anyway, I need help to the article to be published". Why do you need the article to be published? Are you working for the subject? If so, please see the conflict of interest policy. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:11, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nirmika Singh (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nirmika Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nirmika Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 23:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utkarsh Sharma has been accepted

Utkarsh Sharma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Flooded with them hundreds 11:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello Gaurakshat1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Gaurakshat1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gaurakshat1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 14:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to edit this really, till date I have not received any compensation for any of the pages I have edited, Ayaz Ismail as he is my friend and consider him like my brother, I am nephew of Harish Sharma (author), Nirmika SIngh is also a friend if I receive any monetary compensation, I will not hide this, all my edits have been really honest and genuine, request you to please take them back and restore as created. I am really sorry if there's any confusion, I am just a honest man trying to help people I know, with what little I know

Bullshit. You are now blocked. MER-C 17:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 17:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the case please accept my apologies, I will mention that I am being paid for the edits, I was not aware there is a problem in stating truth. Please allow me a warning this time and unsuspend my account. This will not be repeated, it's a honest request from my end. Gaurakshat1 (talk) 04:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I am really sorry for the errors rendered by me of using multiple accounts and not mentioning paid to edit, I really don't want to be on the bad side, I apologise for the mistakes made, I promise to never repeat them again, also promise to edit everything with proper guidance and awarness. Please Unblock me.

You are free to make another unblock request. 331dot (talk) 16:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TOU violations, incubate in draftspace

As per WP:PAID this must go through WP:AFC. Praxidicae (talk) 14:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaurakshat1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The administrator, has blocked me stating that I receive compensation for creating pages, I have created 3 Accounts 2 date, I don't understand where the confussion is, Ayaz Ismail is a friend and brother like, if theres any clarity required I can provide them from these guys, Nirmika Singh is also another friend, whom I was just helping out, I am the nephew of Harish Sharma (author), even the page that I had created of his which is moved to draft says this. There isn't any further truth to this, if I was getting paid for a article I would have mentioned it, but this is India, you don't really charge money from friends and relatives, this is the whole and honest truth, I don;t understand why this confusion has been created altogether. The first page I created was of Utkarsh Sharma, who was a up and coming actor whose release was pending. Request you to unblock me, so that I can contribute to wiki in the same manner. Also going forward, if I create any further pages should I mention that I am being compensated even if I am not? so that I am not stuck in the same cycle again? 07:52, 20 August 2020 (IST)

Decline reason:

I don't believe that you are not compensated. 331dot (talk) 07:53, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is the case please accept my apologies, I will mention that I am being paid for the edits, I was not aware there is a problem in stating truth. Please allow me a warning this time and unsuspend my account Gaurakshat1 (talk) 09:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This will not be repeated, it's a honest request from my end Gaurakshat1 (talk) 09:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaurakshat1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really sorry for the errors rendered by me of using multiple accounts and not mentioning paid to edit, I really don't want to be on the bad side, I apologise for the mistakes made, I promise to never repeat them again, also promise to edit everything with proper guidance and awarness. Please Unblock me.

Decline reason:

I highly suggest a WP:Standard offer here. Up to a few days ago you were telling us you didn't get paid for the edits and didn't use multiple accounts. Now you are saying you lied. That's tough for us to feel comfortable with blocking immediately. So my suggestion is to wait 6 months and come back to this page to request again with full disclosures about all previous accounts and all paid editing you have committed. only (talk) 02:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Harish Sharma (author)

Hello, Gaurakshat1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harish Sharma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:06, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2 Nights in Soul Valley

Hello, Gaurakshat1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2 Nights in Soul Valley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ayaz Ismail

Hello, Gaurakshat1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ayaz Ismail".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]