Jump to content

User talk:GamerPro64/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Dragon Quest

Wow, I am truly sorry, I never even noticed the message you posted a week ago; I guess it coincided with another message I got, and I never saw it. Now that I did see it, however, I can copyedit it again, sure. I'll get right on it. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 18:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion; yes, I finished my copyedit. However, I don't think it is a bad idea for another editor to do it as well. I find that two copyeditors on an article usually results in more than twice the improvement in the writing. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 03:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
It seems that Evaunit666 is already copyediting it; if you want my suggestion, my experience has shown Baffle gab1978 to be an excellent copyeditor. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 03:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Completed!

Thanks to everyone's amazing efforts in February, we have reviewed all of the articles and are now finished with Sweeps! There are still about 30 articles currently on hold, and once those reviews are completed, I will send you a final message about Sweeps process stats including the total number of articles that were passed and failed. If you have one of these open reviews, be sure to update your count when the review is completed so I can compile the stats. You can except to receive your award for reviewing within the next week or two. Although the majority of the editors did not start Sweeps at the beginning in August 2007 (myself included), over 50 editors have all come together to complete a monumental task and improve many articles in the process. I commend you for sticking with this often challenging task and strengthening the integrity of the GA WikiProject as well as the GAs themselves. I invite you to take a break from reviewing (don't want you to burn out!) and then consider returning/starting to review GANs and/or contribute to GAR reviews. With your assistance, we can help bring the backlog down to a manageable level and help inspire more editors to improve articles to higher classes and consider reviewing themselves. Again, thank you for putting up with difficult reviews, unhappy editors, numerous spam messages from me, and taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Interview

Hey — just give me a heads up on my talkpage whenever you're ready for the interview. I'm checking Wikipedia every other day or so; I should be able to get back to you quickly. — Deckiller 16:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Nintendo task force membership update

Hello,

It's that time again to update membership status with the Nintendo task force, which we try to do every 3-4 months (though it's been actually 6 months since the last one) to keep our membership up-to-date.

All participants have been placed on an "Inactive participants" list. To confirm that you're still a member of the Nintendo task force, simply go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo#Members and move your name from the "Inactive participants" list to the bottom of the "Active participants" list. If you are no longer an active member in the task force, you may simply remove your name altogether. After 1 month, on 1 April 2010, all entries under the "Inactive participants" list will be removed. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Nintendo-related articles. Regards, –MuZemike 17:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

re:Questions

Thanks. I'll have them filled out by the end of the week. — Deckiller 16:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, my computer failed and I'm forced to use the lab at school. Spring break is about to start and midterms are in full swing, so I'll probably have to do the interview next edition. — Deckiller 17:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Almost Famous

Trivia is generally discouraged, but there are other ways to deal with it other than removing the entire section. Maybe we could work to try and salvage the content. -Reconsider! 00:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: VG newsletter interview

Wow, it amazes me how quickly these quarters go by. I'll drop a note at Saber's talk page to see if he's interested. Feel free to ask any follow up questions. (Guyinblack25 talk 15:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC))

WP:CROWN

No problem.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Put a note at WT:FOUR and you may find some reviewers.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Anschluss

See Wikipedia:Featured article review/Anschluss/archive1. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Mario
Ridley
After Burner
Monolith Soft
Ico
Twin Cobra
Nintendo
Geno
True Swing Golf
Famicom Wars
Sierra Online
Alien Syndrome
Sinclair User
Split screen (computer graphics)
Pauline
Super PLAY
NES Max
Mario Party Advance
NES Cleaning Kit
Cleanup
Nintendo 64
Shigeru Miyamoto
Bejeweled
Merge
Fox McCloud
Saved game
Nintendo DS
Add Sources
Distance fog
Yoshi
Office of Film and Literature Classification (Australia)
Wikify
F-1 Race
.hack
Half-Life TV
Expand
Nintendo GameCube
Satellaview
Team Fortress

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Ref question

It's a blog-style setup, but they've got editors, G4 is reputable, and the author, apparently I think[1], would meet WP:SPS. So I think we're safe. That packaging is sad, though :P Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 22:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

re: Beyond Good and Evil audio section

Sure, I'm almost done with Gyromancer anyway. --PresN 19:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

FAR noms

Go for it. The limit is usually ignored when there are less than 32 on the FAR list YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

I've got about 5 up at the moment as nobody else seems interested much YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to add YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 04:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

A sincere thank you from Wikiproject Good Articles

On behalf of Wikiproject Good Articles, I would like to express our gratitude to you for your contributions to the Sweeps process, for which you completed 17 reviews. Completion of this monstrous task has proven to be a significant accomplishment not only for our project, but for Wikipedia. As a token of our sincere appreciation, please accept this ribbon. Lara 14:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

RE:BGE refs

Not much in the way of pre-release content. I found a preview, which gives minor details, and a mention in an 2003 E3 feature. Unfortunately, I think most of the stuff I remember was geared toward reception and legacy. I'll keep digging. (Guyinblack25 talk 18:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC))

re:Pee-Wee GAR

Thanks for reminding me, I had almost forgotten. The article will need a lot of work to become a GA. I kind of puzzled on how it obtained GA status in May 2008 (diff). —Mike Allen 03:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

GA Review for Leave Me Alone

Hey, I've corrected all of the problems you listed with the article in it's GA review, do you have any more concerns with the article? Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 15:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: User:GamerPro64/Sandbox

Are you asking if I can look for sources on it? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 16:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review for Big Man on Hippocampus

The copyedit has been completed for the article Big Man on Hippocampus, by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors. If you could continue the review now, I look forward to addressing any further concerns you may have. Gage (talk) 19:28, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Dancing the Dream

Sorry to muck you around like this, but I've withdrawn my nomination at GAN of the above article as an editor has just announced that they will drastically rework the article with me. My apologies again. Pyrrhus16 00:46, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

GAN backlog elimination drive - 1 week to go

First off, on behalf of myself and my co-coordinator Wizardman, I would like to thank you for the efforts that you have made so far in this GAN backlog elimination drive. It has been nothing short of a success, and that is thanks to you. See this Signpost article about what this drive has achieved so far.

We're currently heading into the final week of the drive. At this time, if you have any GANs on review or on hold, you should be finishing off those reviews. Right now, we have more GANs on review or on hold than we do unreviewed. If you're going to start a GA review, please do so now so you can complete it by the end of the month and so that the nominator has a full 7-day window to address any concerns.

See you at the finish!

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 16:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Interview

Yeah, school ends next week and I will have more free time. When would you like to do it? — Deckiller 20:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in the April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive

GAN backlog elimination drives chart up to 1 May

On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, I'd like to especially thank you for your efforts over this past month's GAN backlog elimination drive. It has been nothing short of a complete success, which hopefully results in more expedient good article reviews, increasing users' confidence in the good article nomination processes. Even if you made just a small contribution, it still helped contribute to the success of this drive. Here is what we have accomplished this last month in this drive.

  • 661 total nominations were reviewed. 541 of them passed (~81.8%), 97 (~14.7%) failed, and 23 (~3.5%) ended on hold.
  • The WP:GAN page started at 110,126 bytes length on 1 April and ended at 43,387 bytes length at the end of 30 April (a 66,739 byte reduction in the page, about 60.6% less).
  • Excluding extremes, the longest wait for someone's GAN to be review was about 11.5 weeks at the beginning. (I mistook the figure when I reported to the Signpost that it was 13.) At the end, with the exception of one that was relisted, the longest wait is now at 10 days.
  • 63 different users participated, each having completed at least one GAN, with others also having helped out behind-the-scenes in making the drive a success.
  • The drive started with 463 GA nominations remaining and 388 unreviewed. At the end of the month, we ended with 89 remaining (374 or about 80.8% less) and 47 unreviewed (341 or about 87.9% less).

For those who have accomplished certain objectives in the drive, awards will be coming shortly. Again, thank you for your help in the drive, and I hope you continue to help review GA nominations and overall improve the quality of articles here on Wikipedia.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Nathan Drake (character)

Thank you some much for your support at the FAC! I was beginning to get worried that no one was going to comment, and the nomination would pass by without much review. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 00:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

I do want to improve the whole series. I currently have List of characters in the Uncharted series up for a featured list as well. I will have a look at the game articles next, and then maybe the overall series article. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 00:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Dragon Quest

Sorry it took so long to get back to you. I'm even sorrier to inform you that the archive has nothing on Dragon Quest; the entire series falls between the cracks. Anything before Dragon Warrior VII is too early; the series stopped being released in North America between IV (1992) and VII (2001). I should be able to find reviews for VII, but the sources that would have reviewed it (Electronic Gaming Monthly, Official PlayStation Magazine, Game Informer) all had site makeovers during that time, so their reviews for it are not online. Anything past that is too new. However, despite the lack of stuff in the archive, I did manage to find something. GamePro, whose reviews, as far as I knew, have never been removed from their archives, deviated from their routine and took down their Dragon Warrior VII coverage from their newest site redesign. After a little sleuthing, I found a review, a hands-on, and another hands-on. Hopefully, that's better than nothing. It's all I can find; sorry. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 02:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

A-Class

Want to try going for an A-Class review first or do you think this article is up for a FAC?陣内Jinnai 03:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with the nomation process for A-Class in VG project so if you are I will leave the nomination process to you when you think you're ready.陣内Jinnai 09:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

GAN backlog elimination drive award

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For reviewing 9 good article nominations during the April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive, I hereby present you The Working Man's Barnstar. Nice job! Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Beyond Good & Evil on hold

See the review for my comments. Tezero (talk) 01:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Copacetic. I passed it. Tezero (talk) 02:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Jesus Walks citations

Hmm, well, it looks like web.archive.org doesn't archive the crazy database link formatting they were doing. It seems that billboard just changed their formatting- For example, see [2], which tells you that it hit number 11 on the week of July 31, 2004 and spent 25 weeks on the chart. Unfortunately for you, you can't see more than the top 10 songs on any given week on billboard.com, you have to be on billboard.biz instead, which in turn requires a subscription. So, you can cite that page to get the top position on the 4 charts it was on, as well as how long it was charted for, but you can't get the week-to-week movement that you have in the article without a subscription (which I don't have). So that's billboard- try searching around the site to see if you can refind some of the other information. The only non-billboard dead link you have looks like Vibe, and I can't seem to find the video that you're referencing on the site, so I think it was removed. Sorry! --PresN 15:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

OpenBSD

Hi GamerPro - Could you please revisit your oppose at Wikipedia:Featured article review/OpenBSD/archive1? The main editor working on the article has responded to your comments. Dana boomer (talk) 21:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I hereby present to you...

The VG Barnstar
For your invaluable work in bringing Beyond Good & Evil (video game) to Good article status, I hereby award you the Video Game barnstar.
--MrStalker (talk) 22:15, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: GA push

I'm somewhat iffy. I think the development section is going to have to be partially rewritten to deal with possible unreliable refs, and I'm still not happy with the reception, but I suppose it could make GA. I've got final crunching the next month or so so I won't really be able to put in the hours needed on the article until after the first week of May. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 00:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Go ahead. I'll be working on it when I can. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 12:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Whatever floats your boat. With recent FAs I've done (Halo Wars, Halo 3: ODST) I've pretty much started it off with the average rankings and than critic's overall rankings of the game before drilling down to the constituent parts. What comes before what doesn't matter to me. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 03:51, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Haha, where exactly do you think I live? :P Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 02:52, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Nope, I'm Stateside :P Generally I haven't been impressed by the quality of foreign FAs, but I can have some of my French-speaking friends look it over. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 17:42, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Hey there

I posted the interview answers on the draft page. I'll make some tweaks here and there. — Deckiller 18:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Template:Good article

The template is supposed to go at the bottom of articles, just like {{Featured article}}. This is because most people don't know what the template does, and it certainly is not easy to determine what it does if you don't already know since it changes an image in the corner of the page rather than inline with the text, so a lot of users remove the template. Gary King (talk) 02:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Re:BG&E

I'd like to make this my next focus of attention seeing as time is running out, but unfortunately I won't be able to get to the internet reliably over the next week. Really, I think that expanding the development and reception sections and maybe organizing them more logically, combined with a copyedit, is what the article needs. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 23:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Half-Life 2 FAR

Hi GamerPro64 - Would you please return to the FAR for Half-Life 2 and give more details on your concerns? There is an editor willing to work on the article, but none of the commenting editors appear interested in giving more than a one line general comment accompanied by a "delist". It would be great if you could detail your concerns so that the editor who is working on the article will have some specific comments to start with. Thanks in advance, Dana boomer (talk) 01:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

GamerPro, the editor is still willing to work on the article (see my talk page) so it would be great if you could list your concerns ASAP. Also, please note that FA criteria does not require that every single sentence (or even paragraph) has to have a citation, just information that is potentially controversial, direct quotes, statistics, etc. Just because a paragraph or sentences doesn't have a citation doesn't automatically mean it needs one. This is something that delegates have had to point out on several recent FARs, so I'm just trying to remind everyone of this. Dana boomer (talk) 20:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Can you please take a look at the HL2 article? I've been fixing it and finished your issues and addressing Vaypertrail's issues. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 21:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Futurama revival

Hello. WikiProject Futurama is being revived. Since you are listed as a participant here, you have received this message to make sure you still are. If you like to help update the WikiProject, please discuss here. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Futurama-related articles. GamerPro64 (talk) delivered by MuZebot 06:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Coffee

hiya, i wasn't in a rush to close it as Casliber indicated he would have a go but feel free to close Tom B (talk) 20:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

re Me again

I did all of the steps to remove the featured portal status for Portal:Mars, except removal from Portal:Featured content/Portals. Perhaps you could do that last step for me? Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 21:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

This is not enough, could you please update all the numbering prior to and post "121" on that page? Thanks so much, -- Cirt (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you !!! -- Cirt (talk) 21:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Remember to delete on good article page

hiya, remember when you delist to remove from the good articles page, i've done it for coffee [3], cheers Tom B (talk) 22:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Tagging a project as semi-active with no discussion?

Curious why you tagged WP:SCN with "semi-active", with no prior discussion about that? Have you looked at any of the activity levels of the sub-project pages? (Some of them are automated, but still quite helpful.) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 14:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Okay thanks, no worries. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 14:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Record of Agarest War
Art Style
Steve Jarratt
List of Wii games
Dragon Quest X
Championship Sprint
List of best-selling video game franchises
List of PlayStation Portable games
Williams Arcade's Greatest Hits
Avalanche (video game)
List of Sega video game franchises
List of video game world records
Street Fighter Collection
World Championship Poker
Hanjuku Hero
Atelier (series)
Mercs
GameRankings
Yūji Horii
Cleanup
Dragon Warrior VII
GamesRadar
Interactive Achievement Award
Merge
Formula One video games
Tales of Phantasia (PS1)
Gameplay of Pokémon
Add Sources
Random encounter
Kirby's Dream Land 3
Crazy Taxi
Wikify
Peter Shin
AWESOM-O
Metro-Cross
Expand
Mario Party DS
Dragon Quest character classes
MadWorld

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Activeness

Well, I am a bit busy these days, so I would be logging in to do some stuff some time. Do you wish to discuss anything? Jappalang (talk) 05:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

No, feel free to delist it. As I previously stated in Freelancer's GAR, I no longer have the interest to defend that article (Ninja Gaiden) alone against tendentious editors and have taken it off my watchlist.[4] I would advise first asking at any Wikiproject the article is associated with if anyone is willing to take up that baton (to help keep the article to GA standards) before delisting it though. Good luck. Jappalang (talk) 04:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, GamerPro64. You have new messages at Ost316's talk page.
Message added 20:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Billboard.biz

Sorry. The only magazine I'm subscribed to right now that's anything like that is Rolling Stone. Tezero (talk) 18:30, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

No. You might want to ask around at the Rock, Alternative, or Hip hop WikiProjects, though. Tezero (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Reply

Yes I am ready for your review. No I have not edited the page, but in my view it looks like a Good Article. So I am willing to work on it. Please review it, thanks. HGraphite (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. Everything you suggested is fixed, and the second reviewer made a few comments about the prose that I fixed. Can the article be passed now? HGraphite (talk) 01:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
There you go. Problems fixed. HGraphite (talk) 02:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. Happy editing! HGraphite (talk) 02:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, GamerPro64. You have new messages at Belovedfreak's talk page.
Message added 12:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, GamerPro64. You have new messages at Belovedfreak's talk page.
Message added 13:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. I replied to your messages on Belovedfreak's page (to keep things in the same spot). -- James26 (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, GamerPro64. You have new messages at Belovedfreak's talk page.
Message added 23:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cheers to a good editor

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
I hereby award you the Working Man's barnstar because every time I look in my watchlist you're either leading a GAR or updating WP:VG. I can't think of anyone who fits the definition of "working man" better: here's to you, GamerPro. I should've given you this years ago. Nomader (Talk) 04:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

RE:Dragon Quest

I'm actually reading it right now. That's why I reformatted the table. I'll try to post some comments this week. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC))

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sheffield/archive2

Hello, I fixed the issues you raised in this featured article candidacy. Thanks for raising the issues, it would be nice to hear more from you on the nomination, and maybe even a support or (hopefully not) an oppose. Thanks! -- Jack?! 04:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for putting the "Good Article" tage back on the Kratos article. A lot of work went into trying to get that article in order. Spartancourage (talk) 02:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

Re:FAC

Whoa! Really?? I never knew that! Well, looking at the history, the original reasoning for that rule was so nominators could devote enough effort to address all objections and having more than one nom at a time might prevent the nominator from doing that. But, since it's summer break, I'm basically a full-time editor with few distractions. Maybe you could let it slide this time? I won't do it again. Axem Titanium (talk) 22:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I'll do just that. Axem Titanium (talk) 11:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

Organization XIII GAR

Gamer- I'm not familiar with the entire GAR process. Could you place Organization XIII up for review as I feel don't it meets the Good article criteria. The sourcing issue brought up at Talk:Universe of Kingdom Hearts/GA1 is also present in the article, and it has been a popular editing place for IP address fans. (Guyinblack25 talk 16:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC))

Unfortunately, the same time and energy spent on Universe of Kingdom Hearts was intended to fix the sourcing problem shared by the topic. If you're not comfortable starting the GAR, I'll do it myself. I'm just unfamiliar with the whole process (i.e. how to facilitate it), and figured I'd ask someone with experience. I plan to weigh in on the review and offer suggestions, but the biggest problem is that the "Concept and creation" section is primarily sourced with unreliable sources. It's removal would compromise the article's comprehensiveness. So either way, it doesn't meet the criteria. Not happy to do it, but I think it's the right thing to do. (Guyinblack25 talk 19:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC))
Thanks. Appreciate it. (Guyinblack25 talk 19:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC))
Sorry, about the late reply.
Yes. Whatever you think for GAR. You're in the driver's seat for the review and I certainly trust your judgment for it. (Guyinblack25 talk 14:32, 29 July 2010 (UTC))

VPC

— raekyT 11:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

Zelda FAR

Hi can you have a look at this? It's stalled YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Whatever you can add, since you are interested in the field YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 08:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

"No GAN tag"

Hey, I noticed that you removed a GA nomination from the GAN page because there was "no GAN tag". I realise that drive-by nominations can be frustrating, and in this case it seems that the nominator only has 2 edits ever, so it's probably the right thing! However, I hope you wouldn't remove every nomination you come across that has no tag on the talkpage, thinking that it means the nominator isn't invested enough or something. Yes, they are simple instructions to follow, but people are human! I have forgotten to add the tag on more than one occasion, when I've nominated articles that I've put a lot of work into and have been waiting to make any changes necessary from a review. I've also noticed it on a few that I've reviewed, whose nominators had also put a lot into the article in question, and were waiting for it to be reviewed. Don't get me wrong, I think you did the right thing here, but I just hope "no GAN tag" isn't going to become a new "quick-fail" criterion! --BelovedFreak 09:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

Wikipedia:Featured article review/Fermi paradox/archive1

Please be more specific in which parts of 1c it fails. I added a few specific concerns with the article, but since you're the nominator you should probably add more too. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:26, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Legend of Zelda FAR

Hi GamerPro! Would you mind revisiting the Legend of Zelda FAR? It looks like the main editor has been working on your concerns, but has a couple of questions for you. Thanks! Dana boomer (talk) 15:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

Fermi paradox

Someone wiped out part of my signature. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

Weezer

Sure! Why not! I've been working quite a bit on it. I just recently added some pictures. I'd love to work on it, and any other Weezer albums if you're interested!--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

I can't think of any off the top of my head, but I'll keep a look out. We probably should expand the critical reception section.--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

killer7 FAC

As someone who commented on a previous FAC on killer7, I invite you to take a look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Killer7/archive3 and see if you could make any suggestions or perhaps lend support. Thanks, Axem Titanium (talk) 21:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The Editor's Barnstar

The Editor's Barnstar
For astutely identifying issues with failure of Featured Article standards involving the article Ormulum, and correctly taking the appropriate steps to bring the article to Featured Article review. -- Cirt (talk) 23:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 23:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Halo 2600

Nope, never seen it. Thanks for the link :P Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 16:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

El Salvador national football team review

Who can review it to give it a grade? Jn17 (talk) 00:58, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

Ormulum FAR revisit

Hi GamerPro64, would you mind revisiting Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ormulum/archive1 and checking to see the concerns have resolved. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 01:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

re:Back

Thanks—hopefully I won't suddenly vanish again! —Deckiller (t-c-l) 18:58, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

Re: Undid your undo

Ah, my bad. Thanks! --PresN 02:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

VPC passed
Your Valued picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for valued picture status, File:Starved Vietnamese man, 1966.JPEG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 02:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

Oh hai

I left an answer to your post on my talk page. --gakon5 (talk / contribs) 05:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: Music of FFXIV

I don't make "music of" articles until a game has two albums out, as a general rule. FF14 has 2 singles and no albums out, so I'm holding off since in a regular article I would combine two singles and a regular album release into one section (the "original soundtrack" section). If/When SE releases a different album that would require a second section, like an arranged album or something, or even a release that is something other than a portion of the OSV, I'll make an article for it. In the meantime, any article that would have 1 section of release information stays in (or should stay in, I haven't looked at it) the game article itself. Given SE's current soundtrack release policy, we're probably talking months at most before they release some other album of music from the game, since they keep selling so much, but that's the policy I go by in creating these articles. Don't worry, I have no intention of my pet topic falling down; the article will most likely be at GAN within a week of creation and be added to the topic as a GA before the creation retention is up. The topic is my baby, I'm not going to screw it up. --PresN 09:12, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

Re: F-Zero PR

I'll look over the article again if you will comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Hydro Thunder Hurricane. I'd appreciate it if you comment first, since I've already commented once on F-Zero. --Teancum (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

F-Zero (video game)

While its obvious I (still) have no intention on working diligently on this anytime soon. If you're willing to bring it up higher on the quality scale, I could help out with minor stuff. « ₣M₣ » 16:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Its up to you. You can get to it whenever you want because all I'll ever be for it in the near future is a 'supervisor'. « ₣M₣ » 23:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

I think much of what Teancum says can be resolved once Jimmy Blackwing (he better do it :P) copyedits it. If you feel reception's prose lacks "overall assessment on how critics felt," or something else, then write it. I personally do not like using scores from recent reviews on a game released 20 years ago. To me, its one thing to talk about how a game was perceived around the time of release, but its another to give a score based on "how it stands against the test of time". [5] However, I'm okay with a review table as long as the scores are labeled like 7.5/10 (VC). « ₣M₣ » 22:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Before that, you think you can elaborate on this paragraph I separated? [6] « ₣M₣ » 22:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

Talkback

Hello, GamerPro64. You have new messages at TaerkastUA's talk page.
Message added 14:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WP:FOUR

Did you finish awarding the WP:FOUR Award. I don't many of the steps in your user contribution history.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:39, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

Trent Reznor

Go ahead and close it. I thought it had been closed anyway. WesleyDodds (talk) 01:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

My opinion is that it should be delisted... the fact no one bothered to really make any concerted effort at the GAR isn't really promising. There's a lot of unsourced statements, and the entire layout for the article is haphazard—sections that need to be expanded are out of date, full of trivial details, or just not fleshed out enough (the "criticism of the music industry", for example, is going on four years out of date and focuses on tabloid-style bits as opposed to his wider efforts to circumvent the industry...) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 04:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

Re: Laserblast

Thanks! I've responded. Look forward to working through the review. — Hunter Kahn 02:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

Weezer (2001)

I was going to do a joint nomination but wasn't sure how to. Spiderone 09:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

That's no problem, you can go ahead and throw up as many as needed; was gonna go through the ones whose retentions are up anyway, which looks like what you're doing. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 00:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Re:Metroid Prime

I'm not going to nominate it for FAR-- I feel like the issues are still minor at best, although it can use some good expansion at a few points. That said, I'd be willing to work with you if decide you want to nominate it. The problems are still with the lack of expansion on the "mixed reception" from fans bit and the Versions section. Nomader (Talk) 13:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

Nightwish discography nomination

Hi, the dead link has been replaced. Any other suggestion or it already OK? Rodrigo15 (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Emu

Forgot about that step! Talk:Emu#Article issues. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:20, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Grammy Award for Best Reggae Album

Thank you for reviewing the list. Please let me know if there are any additional concerns that need to be addressed. --Another Believer (Talk) 22:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GamerPro64/Archive_2&oldid=1088840901"