User talk:Gakon5

This is Gakon5's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

For your work on the Greg Street article

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For your excellent work on expanding, improving and rescuing the article on Greg Street during its AfD debate. DustFormsWords (talk) 01:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Persona characters

I haven't played P3, only P4, so feel free to improve it as you see fit. Starting a thread on the talk page and then messaging me about it might have been a better idea so that others could see your suggestions. Anyway, most of the "list of character" articles on Wikipedia need some serious work, and since detailed character info and game script citations are hard to find, they usually languish as crufty lists. Currently the only featured list of characters is List of characters in Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow and Dawn of Sorrow, which has a bunch of game script citations and reception information.

On a side note, I think that this should be moved to List of characters in Persona 3, etcetera, since they are lists.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I already accidentally spoiled it, and I don't plan to play it anyway, because of its length. P4 was an incredible game, though. I'm still confused about what separates a "characters of" from a "list of characters" article, since they seem to be pretty much the same. They each have sections for each character and descriptions of them. I've been able to glean that a "list" has less info per character, but I'm still not sure what makes them different.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:32, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion earlier at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Name standardization? but I didn't really get a complete answer...--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strange Journey categorization

Please contribute to the Megami Tensei template discussion on list categorization if you do not think Strange Journey should be part of the Shin Megami Tensei series as per the history outlined by Atlus[1], I don't see a reason why List of Megami Tensei media should not match the template for this particular subsection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jj984jj (talk • contribs) 10:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Atlus Task Force

Hi, at the moment I'm looking for active editors to participate in the Atlus Task Force, a proposed task force of WikiProject Video games which covers articles related to Atlus and its products. Since you're working on improving Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 3, would you be interested in helping out? If so, could you please leave a comment on WP:VG's talk page. Thanks! Heavyweight Gamer (talk) 08:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Megami Tensei

Hey : ) I saw your List of Megami Tensei Media (which is really impressive, by the way) and was wondering if you were interested in working on some of the other articles with me. The newer PS2 games are already in good shape, so I'm more talking about some of the older games/main series article. Contact me if you have any ideas! ?EVAUNIT^{神の人間の殺害者} 22:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My main idea was for the main series article. It's pretty messy right now and I figured it could be at least as half (or at least 1/4) as good as articles like Final Fantasy. I agree that the whole "most of these games will not have any info on them" is a problem, but I might as well try : ) ?EVAUNIT^{神の人間の殺害者} 04:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've started a Reception section and I think I'll start to clean up and expand the games section. Eventually, I hope to get up a development section (which will probably have mostly info on the newer games). : ] ?EVAUNIT^{神の人間の殺害者} 23:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add in stuff : ] I'm not being very thorough at the moment. I was wondering what you thought about all the really long Japanese titles. They kind of make the article ugly. What do you think??EVAUNIT^{神の人間の殺害者} 20:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I won't put anymore in. and yeah, I was going to source them afterwards. You just beat me to it! ! : ] ?EVAUNIT^{神の人間の殺害者} 20:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fluorescent EP

It's simple, just nominate it again. I can review it again and I will guide you how to make it better. :) --MW talk contribs 01:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments per Request for assessment

I reviewed the Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 3 article and left comments for its improvement at the talk page. I haven't assessed it I'm afraid as I'm not solid enough with the criteria, so sorry about that. Hope they help improve the article though. Leave a comment on my talk page if you have any questions about the review. CrimsonFox ^talk 09:20, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptograms GAR

Congratulations on your fine work at Cryptograms: its passed. Please consider reviewing articles yourself to help with the back-log.shaidar cuebiyar ( talk | contribs ) 02:34, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still here?

Hey Gakon5. I don't know if you remember me, but I reviewed Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 3's GAN. Are you gonna be as active as you were before? I mean, Persona 3 looks like a possible Featured Article. Hope you can work on it again. GamerPro64 (talk) 03:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just kinda go in phases. I figure at some point I'll become active again, but I haven't been active since March of this year it would seem. I did leave a few projects hanging, though, including the Persona 3 article. I've certainly wanted to get back to it. I'll probably have to start by giving it a good read-through, though, since it's been a few months since the release of Persona 3 Portable so who knows what kind of stuff has been layered on the article since then. We're at least in a better position to make the information concrete, though, since the game is actually out. Also, we could ditch the Siliconera sources for P3P with more legitimate review sites.

So, long answer short, why not. Let's see where that article is at these days. --gakon^{5 (talk / contribs)} 05:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

VVVVVV GAN

I have reviewed your GANomination of VVVVVV, and have a few points for you to address there. --Pres N 20:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for your work.

		The VG Barnstar
		As leader of the Indie Task Force for the Video Games project, I am rewarding you with the VG barnstar for your GA victory at VVVVVV. SixthAtom (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Advancewarsds1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Advancewarsds1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation

VG Project Main pages
- Main project – talk
- Project category – talk
- Portal – talk
VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
- Reference library – talk
- Newsletter – talk
- Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

Orphaned non-free image File:Kirbymanga.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kirbymanga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marios cement factory.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marios cement factory.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Category:Harvest Moon games has been nominated for renaming

Category:Harvest Moon games has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheFloodlightCollective.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheFloodlightCollective.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:57, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]