User talk:Galansi
January 2023
[edit]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Proceso (magazine), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 22:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
I moved the page you created
[edit]I don't think you were finished before you published Primary Colors In Psychology so it's now at User:Galansi/Primary Colors In Psychology. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 23:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Primary Colors In Psychology
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Primary Colors In Psychology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hisour.com/shades-of-yellow-23778/, https://www.grafixfather.com/blog/what-is-base-color-hair/, and https://www.interviewarea.com/frequently-asked-questions/what-are-the-16-basic-colors. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Primary Colors in Psychology
[edit]Hi Galansi, this is to let you know that I have restored the redirect from Primary Colors in Psychology (to Primary color#Psychological primaries), since the article didn't have original substantive content of its own. If you want to propose that this content be moved out of Primary color into a new article, then I would recommend starting a discussion on Talk:Primary color to see if there is consensus for such a move. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 11:50, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Primary Colors in Psychology for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primary Colors in Psychology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
... discospinster talk 01:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- The debate is over and it should be improved by adding more sources. The majority decided not to delete it and so I remove the template.
- Galansi (talk) 15:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- AfD discussions generally run for seven days, and are not based on a majority vote. See WP:CLOSEAFD. ℰmi1y⧼T·C⧽ 21:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.