User talk:Gaia Octavia Agrippa/Archive 95
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Gaia Octavia Agrippa. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 90 | ← | Archive 93 | Archive 94 | Archive 95 | Archive 96 | Archive 97 | → | Archive 100 |
The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify: Current Backlog Reduction Plan
Hey, I noticed you marked yourself as a member of WikiProject Wikify and you are currently listed as active. I was wondering if you would be able to assist with our current backlog reduction plan. While traditional drives are more structured month-long sprints by WikiProject Wikify members, there is currently lacking activity within the project and in order to significantly reduce the incredible backlog, members are encouraged to review all articles marked with the Underlinked Template Message - {{underlinked}} - a list of which can be found here - to analyze the worthiness of the template message on the given article. Articles that have nothing to link or are have had wikilinks sufficiently added should have the template removed to clear the backlog and make it easier for editors to find articles in genuine need of wikification. This can be done by any editor; however, all editors should consider joining if they haven't done so already. Thank you!
The Novac (talk) 04:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alison Mardell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Iraq Medal and Chief of the Air Staff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Umpire photos
Hi. I noted that you added a photo recently of umpire Aleem Dar in his Wikipedia page. Do you have any such photo available for umpire Marais Erasmus as well? Would be great if you can provide one if possible. Cricket246 (talk) 07:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Cricket246! I didn't upload the image, rather I cropped it from one I found already on Wikimedia Commons. I having been able to find a usable image of Marais Erasmus yet, but I will have another look. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 10:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've found one that's okay. Its not great, but its better than nothing. It has been added to the article. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 10:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Great job friend... Thank you 😁 Cricket246 (talk) 10:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- You are most welcome. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 10:42, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Great job friend... Thank you 😁 Cricket246 (talk) 10:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've found one that's okay. Its not great, but its better than nothing. It has been added to the article. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 10:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Wanted to ask you can we put in images that were released by ICC as they are supposedly meant for free use?? What's the process of doing that?? There are several good photos of umpires actually released by ICC... Also I was looking for a photo of umpire Joel Wilson!! Cricket246 (talk) 10:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I'm not the person to ask about that. Asking at Commons:Help desk would get you a quick reply. I'll keep an eye out for Joel Wilson. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 10:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Many thanks 🙂 Cricket246 (talk) 18:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St James' Church, Oldham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diocese of Manchester (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Feburary 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.
New:
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Russell (evangelist), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Evangelist and Reader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2018
The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
17:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
The problem with the Don Brothwell article's account of his conscientious objection, as it was before my amendment and as you have now chosen to revert it, is that it purports to state two legal impossibilities:
1) It claims that DB was "called up" immediately upon completing his A-levels, with no mention of any intervening procedure, thereby implying that there was none. In fact, however, the requisite legislation, the National Service (Armed Forces) Act 1948, Section 9 (1), provided that no man could be called up unless he had been duly certified fit for armed forces service by a duly constituted medical board set up for that specific purpose. This was by no means a mere academic nicety, as it meant that so long as a man refused to co-operate with the medical board by submitting to a physical examination, he could not actually be called up - doctors refused to use their own force during an examination, or to examine a man forcibly held by a third party.
2) In saying that DB was prosecuted, no specific charge or offence is stated. The reader is therefore left to infer that the charge must have related to the immediately preceding sentence - DB "became a conscientious objector", apparently thereby committing the offence of being s CO. In fact, as distinct from the situation in many other countries, there has never been such an offence in British law.
So, as consciously reverted by you, the article purports to state the legal impossibility that DB was called up without any prerequisite medical examination, and it also purports to state the legal impossibility that DB was prosecuted, fined and ultimately imprisoned for the non-existent offence of being a conscientious objector.
So much for the article's sins of commission. It also omits to state anything about the actual legal procedures for conscientious objectors as they would have affected DB, and omits to state the basis whereon ten months of DB's sentence was ultimately remitted.
As soon as I read the article, I obviously saw the misleading nonsense it purveyed and now, at your choice, continues to purvey, which is clearly unfair both to Don Brothwell and the uninformed reader. I therefore reconstructed the scenario in the ONLY way it could LEGALLY have happened, and ACTUALLY happened in many similar cases.
As to referencing, I consciously left in the existing references, trusting that at least the germ of the truth lies in them, however much metamorphosed by previous attempts at paraphrasing. I have no independent references of my own on Brothwell, but I am familiar with the minutiae of British CO legislation and thousands of CO cases.
In the hope that Wikipedia encourages accuracy rather than misrepresentation, I look forward to your reasoned argument. Mountdrayton (talk) 19:47, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your detailed explanation. However, Wikipedia relies on verifiability through reliable sources rather than original research in its articles. The above falls under original research as did your edits to the article on Don Brothwell. At the time of my expansion, the article was under the "protection" of the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons guidelines which are very strict. The wording as it is is directly supported by references. Please do have a read of the above links as they will help clarify anything that I haven't made clear. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 22:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tim Hughes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diocese of Birmingham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Is it a stub?
You destubbed Catherine Pickstock, but an IP disagrees with you. PamD 10:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up PamD! I've expanded it a bit more and reviewed it again/removed the stub templates. In case you didn't know already, User:142.161.81.20 is an experienced and frequent editor who, for whatever reason, doesn't want to get a username. They can be troublesome at times but most of their contributions are well meaning. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 17:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks for that info. PamD 23:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Leach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page England Lions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |