Jump to content

Talk:Deep frying

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleDeep frying was one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 18, 2015Peer reviewReviewed
September 27, 2015Good article nomineeListed
September 8, 2022Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 15, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that deep-fried foods (example pictured) have been described as "a staple of almost all street cuisines on all continents"?
Current status: Delisted good article

Needs more info

[edit]

Note: This may be good and all, but what about the process of deep frying memes? Someone should make an article about that. --Teuf0rt (talk) 18:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not accurate please edit

[edit]

Can someone change 2 sentences:

1"Due to the high temperature involved and the high heat conduction of oil, it cooks food extremely quickly."
Quickly as opposed to what? Steaming? Because frying achieves similar speeds. The heat conduction covering the food is the main advantage, no need to stir or flip flood.

2"The effect of these is that the outside of the food becomes crispy and browned, while the inside becomes tender, moist, and steamed. Some foods – such as potatoes or whole, skin-on poultry – have a natural coating and do not require breading or battering."
Batter/breading is indeed applied for taste and texture purposes, so yes food is crispy and browned, but its function is not to make deep fried food 'tender, moist, and steamed', that occurs independent of battering/breading as long as it is not overcooked. This however suggests or implies that battering/breading does those things
Just my 2 cents 217.122.183.107 (talk) 01:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

misleading picture of chip pan fire

[edit]

The picture of a chip pan fire is misleading because it does not mention that there has been water poured into the pan causing an explosion. This error can be attributed to the public awareness campaign for chip pan fires in the united kingdom affecting the search results for those keywords

I would suggest ether replacing the image with one that hasn't had water added to the fire (difficult to find) or including the extra information in the description

this is my first contribution after years of thanklessly using wikipedia to increase my knowledge, I'm sorry if this doesn't follow the standard format I just had to point this out 80.5.128.19 (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History Section NEEDS to be fixed.

[edit]

Can someone take a look at history? No documented use until 2015 at the glenwood house? I mean Glenwood House isn't even capitalized nor is it even accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.23.220.120 (talk) 02:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism now reverted. - Takeaway (talk) 02:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Refs/places to research

[edit]

I plan to use these (I was closing my tabs), but I'm leaving them here in case I don't manage. Thanks, --Bananasoldier (talk) 17:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil

[edit]

Brazil has churros, a sweet deep fried batter filled with doce de leite. From Bahia state comes the acarajé, deep fried corn batter with fillings. -wloveral — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.105.203.119 (talk) 16:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Deep frying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deep frying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deep frying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deep frying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History section is substandard

[edit]

The current history section, up to "French fries", is very weak. The sources include Cook's Info, which is a non-notable blog; Apicius, which is a primary source and sure enough is being misinterpreted (pullum frontonianum is not deep fried); an article on Thrillist; a video on Business Insider, which is essentially a blog aggregator (and the video is no longer viewable); an article on falafel which has no historical content; an article about falafel which only says that that it's been around "for centuries"; and an article which looks promising but doesn't ever distinguish between pan-frying on a greased grid-iron and deep frying, which is what this article is about. I don't have the time right now to do better, but I wonder if we should just replace that paragraph with some sort of place holder until we can find decent sources. --Macrakis (talk) 21:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged the Cook's Info ref as needing a better source. I've removed pullum frontonianum: the recipe clearly isn't talking about deep frying (since it is cooking the chicken in a mixture of broth and oil); anyway, this is a primary source which needs expert interpretation. --Macrakis (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnote

[edit]

Any objection to removing the hatnote? It seems very unlikely to me that anyone looking for the topic of deep-fried memes would type in only "deep fried" or "deep frying". And in any case the topic is sufficiently obscure that all it gets is 1 poorly sourced sentence at Internet meme. I think that the existence of the redirect deep-fried meme suffices. Lennart97 (talk) 15:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed as no objection has been voiced so far. Lennart97 (talk) 14:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
No improvements, delisting. Hog Farm Talk 00:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Deep frying/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This is nowhere near the GA criteria - unreliable web sources, disorganized content that's largely lists of foods, and missing citations everywhere. Significant work is needed. Hog Farm Talk 19:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Deep_frying&oldid=1194706910"