Jump to content

User talk:Gadfium/Archive 24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20←Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26→Archive 28

Trolling

Hi, I dont understand how asking a question about information in an article is “vandalism of an article”? Isn’t a talk page for talking about an article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.88.169.47 (talk) 04:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Trolling is vandalism.-gadfium 05:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
So you can censor talk page comments? Sammy D III (talk) 10:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Talk pages are for discussing how to improve the article.-gadfium 17:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't know you, I think I came here from Plymouth. A quick glance at your user page and talk.
A number showed up and made a GF edit on a talk page. They then made a GF edit that you reverted with a nonsense edit summary.
The number posted a stupid opinion which you deleted (correctly) the second time.
The number then made another GF edit that you reverted with a nonsense edit summary. So when they asked a GF question on your talk page you blew them off with a nonsense reply. I asked why you censored a talk page and you blew me off with another nonsense reply.
How do you feel that you personally can judge whether a question is good enough to be on a talk page? Four of the six number's post were GF, two were just stupid/ignorant. But they weren't bad faith. If the question isn't good enough for anyone to answer then it can just sit there and rot.
This rookie has shown zero signs of bad faith. You are really dumping on, and maybe have chased off, them because of ignorance of the system and your personal opinion of their intelligence. Maybe you could back off some, a new POV, and think for a moment? Sammy D III (talk) 20:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)


Administrators' newsletter – October 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
  • Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
  • The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.

Miscellaneous

  • Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
  • The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Rlab for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rlab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rlab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Imcdc (talk) 13:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Lists of Radio Stations in New Zealand | Thanks for restoring persistent unsourced changes

Hi Gadfium

Thanks for your recent work in restoring records for the various regions and stations. Is there anything that can be done to stop this editor who I think is the same person persistently making malicious updates under different IP addresses?

Thanks, David 101.100.130.181 (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

I've given them a week long range block. If you see further activity by this editor, please let me know.-gadfium 02:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

RfA 2021 review update

Thanks so much for participating in Phase 1 of the RfA 2021 review. 8 out of the 21 issues discussed were found to have consensus. Thanks to our closers of Phase 1, Primefac and Wugapodes.

The following had consensus support of participating editors:

  1. Corrosive RfA atmosphere
    The atmosphere at RfA is deeply unpleasant. This makes it so fewer candidates wish to run and also means that some members of our community don't comment/vote.
  2. Level of scrutiny
    Many editors believe it would be unpleasant to have so much attention focused on them. This includes being indirectly a part of watchlists and editors going through your edit history with the chance that some event, possibly a relatively trivial event, becomes the focus of editor discussion for up to a week.
  3. Standards needed to pass keep rising
    It used to be far easier to pass RfA however the standards necessary to pass have continued to rise such that only "perfect" candidates will pass now.
  4. Too few candidates
    There are too few candidates. This not only limits the number of new admin we get but also makes it harder to identify other RfA issues because we have such a small sample size.
  5. "No need for the tools" is a poor reason as we can find work for new admins

The following issues had a rough consensus of support from editors:

  1. Lifetime tenure (high stakes atmosphere)
    Because RfA carries with it lifetime tenure, granting any given editor sysop feels incredibly important. This creates a risk adverse and high stakes atmosphere.
  2. Admin permissions and unbundling
    There is a large gap between the permissions an editor can obtain and the admin toolset. This brings increased scrutiny for RFA candidates, as editors evaluate their feasibility in lots of areas.
  3. RfA should not be the only road to adminship
    Right now, RfA is the only way we can get new admins, but it doesn't have to be.

Please consider joining the brainstorming which will last for the next 1-2 weeks. This will be followed by Phase 2, a 30 day discussion to consider solutions to the problems identified in Phase 1.

There are 2 future mailings planned. One when Phase 2 opens and one with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Best, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar

The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
Thank you for your work to upgrade the Christchurch suburb articles to a consistent level with up-to-date information! I had been trying but you were able to make it much cleaner and using more recent information than I could have! Turnagra (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
this WikiAward was given to Gadfium by Turnagra (talk) on 18:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I'm not particularly familiar with Christchurch so wasn't always confident that I made the right choices of aligning suburbs with statistical areas. I did spend a couple of nights in Christchurch last March, but spent the day out on Banks Peninsula riding the high gravel roads hoping for spectacular views. Unfortunately it was wet and so foggy I sometimes could barely see the road immediately ahead of me. I drove around the residential red zone a couple of years ago but only had a short time available.-gadfium 19:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
I shall second the notion of awarding a Barnstar for this solid work. In fact, I had the same action on my plate for when the last red link disappears from the suburb navbox but it's entirely possible that the remaining places aren't their own census area (which was the underlying driver of this work). But it's not your job to make all red links go away and for what you've done, you surely deserve to be recognised. Schwede66 20:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
To be fair, Christchurch suburbs are more nebulous than most I suspect - I've grown up in the city and even I'm not entirely sure where to draw the lines between them! Turnagra (talk) 23:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

RfA Reform 2021 Phase 2 has begun

Following a 2 week brainstorming period and a 1 week proposal period, the 30 day discussion of changes to our Request for Adminship process has begun. Following feedback on Phase 1, in order to ensure that the largest number of people possible can see all proposals, new proposals will only be accepted for the for the first 7 days of Phase 2. The 30 day discussion is scheduled to last until November 30. Please join the discussion or even submit your own proposal.

There is 1 future mailing planned with the results of Phase 2. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

16:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Lists of Radio Stations in New Zealand

Hi Gadfium

The disruptive edits are happening again. Suspect it is same editor but reverted to a previous IP address 2407:7000:aa1f:5e00:b568:648e:b925:ce33.

Thanks, David 101.100.130.4 (talk) 07:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I've renewed their block, this time for a month.-gadfium 07:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Sean wainui

Hi do you keep changing Sean Wainui birth place to whatatutu? Where do you get this information? I suggest contact his Mother. He was born in Auckland. Lazy journalists keep printing this because of this stupid Wikipedia and its offensive please stop changing it thanks 115.188.8.46 (talk) 09:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

I didn't add this in the first place, but I have repeatedly asked you for sources and you have not provided them. He clearly had a connection with Whatatutu. As you say, it appears in reliable sources such as NewstalkZB as his birthplace. You could contact the media and ask where they got this information from and if they haven't done their due diligence they should publish a correction, which can be cited in the article. I am happy to remove his birthplace entirely as a disputed fact in the meantime.-gadfium 17:18, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

WP:LTA/TFD

Found them using the IPs 120.155.56.82 and 121.218.28.83 and went to AIV. Perhaps a rangeblock is in order.... wizzito | say hello! 07:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Gadfium. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Nauseous Man (talk) 06:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Logicians has been nominated for merging

Category:Logicians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Deri Lorus (singer)

Hi, I need some assistance on Deri Lorus (singer) page. A user continues to remove the CSD for an article that is eligible for G4 (and previously SALTED)[1]. -KH-1 (talk) 08:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

Administrator changes

removed A Train • Berean Hunter • Epbr123 • GermanJoe • Sanchom • Mysid

Technical news

  • Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
  • The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Kea edit, not the only alpine parrot

Hello Gadfium, I am new to editing anything on wikipedia so please let me know if I have done anything improper. I wanted to let you know why I removed the Kea section about it being the only alpine parrot.

The Mountain parakeet resides in an alpine region on the Andes called the Puna grassland. One of two sections of alpine zone in the Andes the other of which is the Paramos.

https://wrangle.org/ecoregion/south-america/tundra-alpine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_parakeet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpine_tundra — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.38.52.98 (talk) 08:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

You should have explained that when you first removed the sentence. It looked like you might be removing it because it was tagged as citation needed, so I found a citation for it. There may be a case that tropical mountain terrain is very different from cold mountain terrain, but 'alpine' doesn't seem to be the right word, and I'll leave it to the experts.-gadfium 16:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

RFA 2021 Completed

The 2021 re-examination of RFA has been completed. 23 (plus 2 variants) ideas were proposed. Over 200 editors participated in this final phase. Three changes gained consensus and two proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration. Thanks to all who helped to close the discussion, and in particular Primefac, Lee Vilenski, and Ymblanter for closing the most difficult conversations and for TonyBallioni for closing the review of one of the closes.

The following proposals gained consensus and have all been implemented:

  1. Revision of standard question 1 to Why are you interested in becoming an administrator? Special thanks to xaosflux for help with implementation.
  2. A new process, Administrative Action Review (XRV) designed to review if an editor's specific use of an advanced permission, including the admin tools, is consistent with policy in a process similar to that of deletion review and move review. Thanks to all the editors who contributed (and are continuing to contribute) to the discussion of how to implement this proposal.
  3. Removal of autopatrol from the administrator's toolkit. Special thanks to Wugapodes and Seddon for their help with implementation.

The following proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration:

  1. An option for people to run for temporary adminship (proposal, discussion, & close)
  2. An optional election process (proposal & discussion and close review & re-close)

Editors who wish to discuss these ideas or other ideas on how to try to address any of the six issues identified during phase 1 for which no proposal gained are encouraged to do so at RFA's talk page or an appropriate village pump.

A final and huge thanks all those who participated in this effort to improve our RFA process over the last 4 months.

This is the final update with no further talk page messages planned.

01:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Tamil Bell Edits

Hello Gadfium, I made a change to the Tamil Bell wiki page around October this year. Apologies for not explaining the edit itself, which in retrospect I should have. The issue with that page is the reading of the script on the bell. Since I can read that form of Tamil, it clearly reads "Mohoyideen Buks udaiya kappal udaiya mani" lit. Mohoyideen Buks' Ship Bell. The reading "Sikaiyya Tanava ... Kappal udaiya Mani" is not present.

Now I did take a look at the citation given for this reading, and the book does suggest this latter Sikayya reading, but neither gives citations for it nor explains why its interpretation is different from the commonly accepted Mohoyideen reading. It doesn't explain who did this interpretation either. The only other mention of this interpretation that I can find is from the book "Sea: Our Saviour By K. Sridharan, pg 19" which doesn't provide citation for it either. All in all, that reading seems highly suspect as I can literally read the text to see that it doesn't mention the words "Sikiaiyya Tanava" anywhere in the inscription.

As for the commonly accepted Mohoyideen reading, that the reading accepted by the Museum of New Zealand. See the links below: https://collections.tepapa.govt.nz/object/213397 https://teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/1135/the-tamil-bell

The same reading is favoured by the Polynesian Society: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20702311

They also released a detailed breakdown of the inscription, which shows the sound corresponding to each individual character (note how the Sikiaiyya Tanava is completely missing): http://www.jps.auckland.ac.nz/document//Volume_84_1975/Volume_84%2C_No._4/The_story_of_the_Tamil_bell%2C_by_Brett_Hilder%2C_p_476-484/p1

So I do implore you, please do look into this and make the necessary changes as you see fit because it seems to be a major error imo. Thank you!

- Pandiya123 (talk) 08:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise giveaway nomination

A t-shirt!
A token of thanks
Hi Gadfium! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
A snowflake!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en@lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Tarakohe

On 4 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tarakohe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 20 of Ernst Plischke's designs for the Abel Tasman Monument (pictured) in New Zealand's Tarakohe were rejected before he designed a tall, tapering column referencing the Greek funerary stele? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abel Tasman Monument. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tarakohe), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

"Breatha" vs. "Scafie"

Hey there, I noticed your edit on the University of Otago page in which you stated Breatha as being the more recent term to refer to students at the University of Otago. You are correct in that the term is commonly used amongst many of the students, however it differs to "Scarfie" in that it refers to a specific subset of students who adopt certain characteristic or identities associated with the "Breatha" term. I removed the edit, but if you wished to maintain its presence I'd recommend stating that it exists as a sub group of students and not a term used to refer to all students at the University. Thanks. Sadke4 (talk) 15:50, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry?

You recently reverted a link on Whanganui that looked very much like advertising. Several attempts have been made to add this link by a number of American IP users. Please advise. OrewaTel (talk) 04:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

I don't know whether the company linked to is notable; it's not my area of expertise. The link was inappropriate at Whanganui, and didn't show any connection to the city. Feel free to let me know if you see other IPs (re-)adding such links.-gadfium 04:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
At the end of December IP user 24.180.25.144 tried adding this particular link three times. You reverted the first incompetent attempt. Skysmith reverted the proper link twice. I posted a warning on 24.180.25.144 Talk. Since Whanganui must be on your Watchlist, you'll pick up the inevitable next attempt. OrewaTel (talk) 06:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Ok, I'm now more primed to pick up the next attempt. I don't think I had realised that 24.x and 72.x had been making substantially the same edits. I see many attempts a day to add people who may not be notable to articles.-gadfium 08:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you very much for your welcome and sage advice.Yelsorc (talk) 09:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Head Hunters

Hi, I'm trying to edit page, but I hadn't finished with uploading sources, and now everything has been taken down.. how can I fix this? Head Hunters mc GHOST UNIT (talk) 10:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Replied at User talk:Head Hunters mc GHOST UNIT.-gadfium 18:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry no2?

Regarding this revert, our sock appears to be back. Do you have time to deal with it / file a report? I'll have to knock off now. I guess there's IP hopping going on but I'm not up with the technical intricacies. Schwede66 04:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

I've blocked and tagged them. I see you've semi-protected Theo Schoon. gadfium 04:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! Schwede66 08:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks...

for the unblock :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

@RoySmith:. I really don't understand what happened. I reverted an obvious troll from the WMF page, and somehow clicked on you as the previous editor of the page rather than them. As soon as I clicked the block confirmation I realised the user name was nothing like the Serbian name I had intended to block. I am so sorry about this.-gadfium 17:45, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
It's totally not a problem. I do stuff like that all the time. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
@RoySmith: I got accidentally blocked last year. See mi:User talk:Gadfium#so sorry.-gadfium 20:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
  • When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Matariki

Hi. I'm sure it was good faith, but can you please roll back your date change edit. The bill was passed Yesterday, 7th APRIL, as you can verify.

I'm on mobile, and can't see how to revert your edit from here.

Thanks. ‒ Jaymax✍ 03:58, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Also, apparently I'm logged in to wiki as different users on different devices.... DOH! ‒ Jaymax✍ 04:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

I changed the article this morning to read 7 April, and added a ref. Previously it read 7 March, which is an easy mistake to make for people who don't write the date regularly. I've just changed another mention of March which I had missed in my previous edit.-gadfium 04:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

IP Vandal 110.174.179.98

Hi Gadfium. About IP 110.174.179.98. You blocked the account early this month, but I see that he is back. Interestingly, the account made three edits 1 2 3 with references to "gay", two of them on the same article where user Annis1234 made a similar (and only) edit also with a reference to "gay". Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 12:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately, 'gay' vandalism is too common to establish a link between the anon and the account. One of the anon's two most recent edits was constructive, so the IP address is probably used by multiple people, and in any case the last edit was a couple of days ago so the time to block has passed. Thanks for the heads-up!-gadfium 20:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

West Auckland demographics

Good evening! If you have some time, would you be interested in making some demographics sections for some of the settlements around the Waitākere Ranges? Little Huia, Karekare, Parau and Woodlands Park all lack demographics sections (and I'm very bad at navigating the stats NZ website!). Possibly Whatipu as well, although I'm not sure if anyone lives there permanently. --Prosperosity (talk) 06:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Prosperosity: Karekare and Parau will not be a problem and I'll make them a priority. Whatipu doesn't have a statistical area devoted to it, so probably doesn't have a significant permanent population. Little Huia has an SA1 area possibly a bit larger than what I think of as the area but close enough that I'll work with it. Woodlands Park does not have any clear boundaries; Statistics New Zealand considers it and Waima the same area, and Fire & Emergency (which generally have their own fairly sensible definition of suburban boundaries) consider it part of Titirangi. I'll find some reasonable combination of SA1 units for it. See [2] for the maps I work with, clicking to show Statistical area->Statistical Area 2-2018, Statistical area->Statistical Area 1-2018, and Urban Rural for the overlays I use.-gadfium 09:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you so much! I knew Whatipu would be a long-shot. --Prosperosity (talk) 21:35, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
All done except Whatipu. I had another look and it seems like populations by meshblock are no longer published. I did have access to this a couple of years ago, but it has disappeared. Feel free to ask me for further demographics.-gadfium 05:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you so much! All these pages look so much more fleshed out now. --Prosperosity (talk) 22:40, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Actually, I do have another demographics question. I recently created Rotuman New Zealanders, and the demographics section isn't as complete as the other ethnic community articles. Would you be able to take a look? --Prosperosity (talk) 22:46, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Similar information is available in quick stats for ethnic communities as for geographical ones, but my script uses raw tables (called 'Statistical area 1 dataset for 2018 Census') rather than the pretty quick stats page, and the raw tables for ethnic groups (which appear to be the ones at the bottom of [3]) aren't in the same format so a complete redevelopment of the script would be required. The quick stats page does have a lot of data, which can be manually added to the article, but I have no interest in doing so myself.-gadfium 23:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed Xero article updates

Hey there, I work for Xero and am seeking updates to the company article. Do you have time to review a couple of requests at Xero? You recently implemented one of my proposed changes, and I see that you have a special interest in NZ-related articles so this request may be of interest. I have a conflict of interest, so I do not edit the article myself. Thank you! JT at Xero (talk) 05:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

@JT at Xero: I have seen your requests for updates, but company details do not particularly interest me. I have no shortage of other work on Wikipedia. I hope someone else responds to your requests. Thank you for respecting the conflict of interest guidelines.-gadfium 05:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
@Gadfium: No problem, thank you for your quick response! JT at Xero (talk) 05:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gadfium/Archive_24&oldid=1094162795"