User talk:GMcGath

Welcome

Hello, GMcGath, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 21:39, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raj Bhakta refs

Thank you for cleaning the ref tags up in that article. I wanted to add the refs to support the comments, but I didn't have the time to get the pages looked up for title, etc. —C.Fred (talk) 02:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I had no idea you were here. Phr (talk) 22:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BSA Controversies

Hi, I noticed that you have been trying to insert a link to the BSA Controversies article in the Boy Scout article. I figured that you may not be aware that this has been tried before, and that there are very good reasons to not do this at Talk:Boy_Scout#.22Controversies.22. In summary, however, the Boy Scout article is about the internationallly recognised movement and its members, and whatever controversies there are with a specific national organisation should not be related to a movement of which that national organisation is only a small part of. Cheers Horus Kol 09:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply taken back to the Boy Scout article, where it belongs, not here. GMcGath 12:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if you feel it inappropriate to take this to you directly, but I had assumed that you were unaware of the discussion at Talk:Boy Scout article since you simply repeated edits which had been reverted for the reasons stated in those discussions. Horus Kol 09:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BSA is just a small part of the world scouting movement and BSA plays a large part in United States society, maybe you can put in it in that article? --Egel _Reaction? 10:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did, the Boy Scout Police didn't like that either. :) GMcGath 23:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation request

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Boy Scout, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Proposed deletion of Ergo (newspaper)

The article Ergo (newspaper) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks sources to demonstrate notability and I cannot locate any.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RL0919 (talk) 02:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ergo (newspaper) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ergo (newspaper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ergo (newspaper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RL0919 (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]