i noticed you edited The Great Big Quiz recently - your edits have been reverted by "Mel Etitis" a user who I personally dislike very much as I have had the same problem with her over the past three months or so - she doesn't have a clue about The Great Big Quiz yet she is determined to wreck the page and keep it from becoming a bigger and better page. She just deletes every edit you do - no matter what. I've told a few other people about this, and hopefully with your help too we can convince this twit that we're right and they're wrong.
Just look at the page history!
Hi,just to let you know why I have amended your recent edit to the above page as unfortunately your edit removed a link to a local newspaper article about her appearance in the Notes section, and did not link the official Soapstar Superchef website to Notes. If you look at the history of the page it might appear that I have just reverted your edit, but that was the best way to retain the newspaper article link that had been removed by your edit. I have of course, put all the information you provided back in! Thanks♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk18:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for Image:Channel TV ident 2006.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Channel TV ident 2006.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 21:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:GMTV.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ 21:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:STV logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
Thanks for uploading Image:Virginradio.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
Although you added some information when you uploaded the pic, it needs to be readded to the page, because it isn't there in the main text of the image description. --tgheretford (talk) 18:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:City Lights (ITV series) with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:City Lights (ITV series).
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:City Lights (ITV series)/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:City Lights (ITV series) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!
This seems to be lifted straight from the official synopsis of the series. Perhaps you could rewrite it, describing the series in your own words? Thanks. TomPhil14:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks! --Mel Etitis (Talk) 16:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Recently you removed a section on the ITV page setting out the reporters and presenters ... why did you do this when the other pages on TV news networks do the same. Sky for example has a long long list of reporters and presenters? You left no explaination as to why you did this, please explain your actions if you are going to just hatchet articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.255.52.28 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 21 April 2007
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Anna Williamson. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.gm.tv/index.cfm?articleid=13448 in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDLor released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Anna Williamson with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Anna Williamson with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Anna Williamson saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your original contributions are welcome.
Thanks for uploading Image:TomWeirSTV.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Don't be silly. First, "unexplained" means that no edit summary was given; I gave one. "Unsourced" is irrelevant when the edit consists solely of making a correction in line with MoS or WikiProject style. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 13:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. You keep changing the order of the categories on the Kingdom article. They're listed in alphabetical order, which is the recommended order. Please don't change it back again or at the very least provide an edit summary with a reason for doing so. WindsorFan18:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned fair use image (Image:CiTV Logo September 2004 - May 2006.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:CiTV Logo September 2004 - May 2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot04:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Scotsport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot03:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:NorthTonight.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot04:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:STVStefaniDailly.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:GMTV2logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot20:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Category:GMTV taken out of use -- was this discussed at CFD?
Thanks for uploading Image:More4logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:ITV1logo06.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
I consider it very discourteous to revert another user's change without an edit summary, especially marking the edit as 'minor' which is deliberately evasive. We've had issues with you and this page before, could you just try being reasonable for once? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agentsoo (talk • contribs) 16:51, 6 June 2007
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Streets-logo2.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Riana⁂15:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
RE: "Stop adding more to the list. This section should be kept at 10 shows, as it will end up getting messy"
If the consensus at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not is going the way it is, full and comprehensive programme lists may be encyclopedic. ie. full = a lot more than ten! Should be fun..!
Thanks for uploading Image:EwanPetrieSTVNews.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot07:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:HeatherSimpson.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr15:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above notice also applies to the following 29 images:
Thanks for uploading Image:Scotsport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot06:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Itvonline2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot06:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:NorthTonight.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot09:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've edited 'Scene One' - I propose this is renamed to SceneOne so that it matches the press releases and the logotype. You can also see from the screenshots that the title is SceneOne. Regards, Walt11108:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:ITVCentralTonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot05:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article is pretty messy because it is a mixture of list and prose which is why in its current guise, I don't agree with the move, that doesn't mean I don't agree in principle with the idea of a list article of Channel 4 programmes or the name you chose. I just think attention should first be drawn to the state the article is currently in and what should be done to tidy things up a bit, before we settle on a different name for the article.
Your comments much appreciated in above talk page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Tonight.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:ITVWalesTonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot21:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi GMc, was contacting to see if you could help me out with a reference for ITV regions. I'm currently building up the Barrow-in-Furness article and adding citations to the text that is already there. Your Image:ITVmap.jpg tells me pictorially tells me what I know to be true: that Barrow falls into the Granada ITV region. What did you source your map? I'm not sure, but I don't think I can reference your image per se. Any help would be much appreciated. Kijog14:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's interesting to note that you've changed itv.com/citv to citv.co.uk on the main article, no doubt because itv.com/citv no longer redirects straight to that site. The reason that it is interesting is that I changed it to that way back in December 2006, upon which you started an edit war, insisting that it should be itv.com/citv. There's even the discussion we had still on the CITV list article talk page. Just thought I'd point it out ;) TheIslander23:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As I explained last time, CITV advertise both itv.com/citv and citv.co.uk. As the latter is the actual adress, it is the one that should be used - why link to a redirect? TheIslander20:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there GMc. I'm The Random Editor. I recently changed the color of the above template so that it would match the other virgin group company infoboxes. Is there any particular reason you undid my edit. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 19:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
_2){kind=link}
){kind=link}
_2){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
