Talk:City Lights (2007 TV series)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the City Lights (2007 TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Lights

Currently, Northern Lights (TV series) redirects here. It has also been implied elsewhere on Wikipedia that City Lights is simply a renamed version of Northern Lights, as opposed to a full sequel. This is incorrect; City Lights is a sequel to Northern Lights, and should be treated as such. Please either create a Northern Lights article, or delete the redirect. Thank you for your time. Ppk01 14:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right, everything's been fixed; there are now separate articles for all three Lights, be they of the Christmas, Northern or City variety. Ppk01 21:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

I have posted a new version of the article at Talk:City Lights (ITV series)/Temp, which omits the sections that violate copyright and rephrases the opening paragraph. Ppk01 17:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update

is anything being done about the copyright violation? if you've made a new article, why not replace it? for people who don't edit wikipedia, they might not know how to see previous edits of this article, etc. people come here for info, so no good if there's a big message about copyright instead of an actual article! just a thought, it doesn't look good, seeing that message. Geeness 21:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should be dealt with by an admin after 7 days (see this page for more information). It's been 6 days now so it should be dealt with in the next few days. ^Tom _Phil 22:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Garion96 (talk) 21:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on City Lights (ITV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703235332/http://www.robsongreen.com/city_lights/ to http://www.robsongreen.com/city_lights/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]