User talk:Futuristas

Welcome!

Hello, Futuristas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cyber kids, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cyber kids

A tag has been placed on Cyber kids requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cyprus Peace Bazaar

The article Cyprus Peace Bazaar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possibly fais WP:ORG and/or WP:CLUB

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 15:08, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Douglas G. Stuart

A tag has been placed on Douglas G. Stuart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 15:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cyprus Employers & Industrialists Federation

A tag has been placed on Cyprus Employers & Industrialists Federation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yousou (talk) 16:33, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Futuristas. You have new messages at WP:REFUND.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JohnCD (talk) 17:35, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Structured dialogic design

The article Structured dialogic design has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Abandoned Projects

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Weaponbb7 (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Cyprus Peace Bazaar

I have nominated Cyprus Peace Bazaar, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus Peace Bazaar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kudpung (talk) 12:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Futuristas. You have new messages at Jujutacular's talk page.
Message added 16:48, 11 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Nomination of Structured dialogic design for deletion

The article Structured dialogic design is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Structured dialogic design until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cmprince (talk) 18:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hellenic Society for Systemic Studies

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hellenic Society for Systemic Studies, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.hsss.gr/eng/index.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hellenic Society for Systemic Studies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hellenic Society for Systemic Studies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gavin.perch (talk) 14:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hellenic Society for Systemic Studies

A tag has been placed on Hellenic Society for Systemic Studies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 16:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Futuristas, I have deleted this article due to the copyright problems and also because it does not make a claim of notability; that is, it is unclear from the article why there should be an encyclopedia article about it. The best way to help establish the notability of a subject is to include high quality, independent, reliable sources in the article that significantly cover the subject. This also helps readers find out more about the subject and verify the information in the article, so reliable sources are hugely important for Wikipedia. If you would like to recreate this article please feel free, but please respect the copyrights of the sources you are using and Wikipedia's position that we can not be in violation of copyright law, and please include some reliable, 3rd party sources in the article. Please let me know if I can help; I'll be watching this page for a few weeks at least so you can just leave a note here. Thanks for working on this! ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:37, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Erik This is like one is being attacked from multiple soldiers at the same time for trying to help Wikipedia develop. I will give you two simple reasons why I think the deletion was unfair: 1. The first reason for speedy deletion was copyright infringement because according to the first editor, Gavin.perch, I copied text from the Society's webpage. Even though I completely re-wrote it ANOTHER editor was not satisfied. In the mean time I have contacted the actual President of the Hellenic Society and requested that he sends an email -as per Wikipedia rules- confirming his consent to use the "copyrighted" content of his Society's website. I placed the {{hang on}} message, but you have deleted the article before he even received the email, i.e. within a few hours. Gavin.perch supposedly gave me some time to react. But in the mean time the article disappeared.

2. If you go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_systems_sciences_organizations you will see almost all countries' Systems Science societies listed. Is there any reason why you believe that the Greek Systems Society is less notable and should be discriminated and deleted. Moreover at a time that Greece needs entrepreneurial contributions and innovations as those promoted and facilitated by its Systems Society? This to my opinion approaches political discrimination.

I will kindly request your immediate help to re-establish the page. I might be new to Wikidedia, but I strongly believe in its principles and philosophy and to my STRONG opinion deletion of GREECE page of its Systems Society page does not serve Wikipedia. Administrator TRANSPORTERMAN gave me a long message with help and I was under the impression that a formal letter by the President regarding the copyright issue would resolve the conflict. I would greatly appreciate your constructive suggestions of how a country's society can have the same treatment like all other countries.

Futuristas (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry this has been frustrating; I realize it seems harmless to copy the text that you copied and the owners are probably fine with it, but from Wikipedia's perspective this is a really serious problem. The rewrite really was not sufficient to avoid copyright issues, please see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. If the email is sent in; that is fine, it really isn't a big deal to recreate the page once the copyright issues have been taken care of; although of course it is probably easiest to just rewrite the content. Please consider doing that instead. Regarding the notability issues, please give me the benefit of the doubt; I assure you I have no opinions or personal interest in different countries' systems science organizations. In any case I see that a lot of the items on that list don't seem to have articles, and for all I know some of the ones that do shouldn't. However, regardless of my personal feelings on the matter, Wikipedia articles really do need to have 3rd party reliable sources. It's pretty much what we're all about. In addition to establishing notability, sources help readers verify the information in the article and give them a way to find out more about the subject. Please let me know if I can do anything to help! ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 01:07, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear ErikHaugen The President of the Hellenic Society has called me on the phone and let me know that he has send the email. Can we please have the page back on line so that we can now focus on its notability issue? I really appreciate your help. Futuristas (talk) 12:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can go ahead and re-create it if you rewrite the content, but until the email is received and processed by the people that process them please don't add any copyrighed text or close paraphrases of copyrighted text. The people that process these emails are volunteers and sometimes it takes awhile. Again; please consider rewriting the content. In any case, if you have any 3rd party, reliable sources you could go ahead and create the article with those while you wait for the copyright issues to be dealt with. Please let me know if I can help with anything, and thanks for working on this article! ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:00, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Would you be so kind to recover the deleted article in my userspace please? And when I am done with edits, then I can request your help to check it and then move it in the main name space. Futuristas (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, here: User:Futuristas/Hellenic Society for Systemic Studies. Thanks! ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 19:00, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Erik, how do I know that Wikipedia has received the email that the President has already sent more than a week ago regarding the copyright issues? Because a bot has now deleted the logo of this organization. I would appreciate your advice Futuristas (talk) 08:13, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you even need the permission email for the logo. Dashbot's edit summary points to the reason why the logo was removed: Wikipedia:NFCC#9 - your article is not in article space. I think you can just leave it like it is, then if/when you move the article to article space, you can revert dashbot's edit and you should be all set. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Futuristas, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Futuristas/Hellenic Society for Systemic Studies. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Douglas G. Stuart

The article Douglas G. Stuart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards for an academic (WP:PROF).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cmprince (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CNTI lineart.pdf

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CNTI lineart.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If reviewed Future worlds Center, could you remove the TAG?

Dear Futuristas

Since you have reviewed some time ago the Future Worlds Center Article, and I have today made some more edits to improve the citations, can you please look at it again and possibly remove the "unreviewed article tag"??

Maryafrika (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:53, 1 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Aleco Lesvos2010.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Diacritics

Hello. Please do not omit diacritics when adding Ancient Greek text to articles as you did here. --Omnipaedista (talk) 09:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takis.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Takis.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 16:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Futuristas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Futuristas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Futuristas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Futuristas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cyber Kids has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cyber Kids. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cyber Kids has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cyber Kids. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyber Kids (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Whole sections of this are unsourced. Notability not demonstrated by the articles provided as they point to random associated websites.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cyber Kids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cyber Kids, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Futuristas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carl Ludwig Institute of Physiology

The article Carl Ludwig Institute of Physiology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable facility of University of Leipzig where it is already mentioned. So there's zero reason to have an article about it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carl Ludwig Institute of Physiology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Ludwig Institute of Physiology, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Ludwig Institute of Physiology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Technology for peace for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Technology for peace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology for peace until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Obermallen (talk) 05:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]