User talk:Fridaykings

Fridaykings Wishes you all a joyous day!

Nomination of Sheikh Ashiq Ahmad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheikh Ashiq Ahmad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh Ashiq Ahmad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:54, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yasser Desai

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yasser Desai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasser Desai. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 19:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I am not fully aware why this page was deleted before because I didn’t go through a history Of this page I directly created an article on a main space by knowing that he’s a popular name in music industry and for me he deserves to be on Wikipedia. He has sung many songs in Bollywood and if there is anything on which I couldn’t convince or he doesn’t meet the wiki guidelines you may delete it.Fridaykings (talk) 19:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Davinder Singh (DSP)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Davinder Singh (DSP), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of http://english.madhyamam.com/en/national/2020/jan/13/kashmir-dsp-likely-be-stripped-gallantry-award. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Puneet Khanna moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Puneet Khanna, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Razer(talk) 19:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puneet Khanna (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Puneet Khanna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Puneet Khanna, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 19:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fridaykings! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 19:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fridaykings

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fridaykings (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for none of my fault! I am being accused of using multiple accounts and for that I have mailed to respected Arbitration team with my ID Proof. but still it has been surprising that Arbitration team didn’t acknowledge my mail yet & I do not understand how I should give my clarification on being falsely accused of handling multiple accounts. It’s my humble request please & please unblock me Fridaykings (talk) 20:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it. If you have not used multiple accounts, you need to provide a plausible explanation as to why the evidence indicate you are, if you are not. You should not provide personal identity documents to anyone, for your protection- and doing so would only prove that you possess identity documents, not that you are the person depicted in them. Your identity is not at issue. I am declining your request.331dot (talk) 20:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fridaykings (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected user:331dot I have mailed to Arbitration team in the beginning with all the possible reasons to defend my self! It is disheartening and so unfortunate that even after a person has kept his truth, he is asked to give us some more cLarification. I have never ever used any other account to mislead Wikipedia guideline. I have provided my iD proof to let the arbitration team know who exactly I am and in future they can make sure that who’s using this account User:Fridaykings. May be I am accused because the person you have mentioned as a reason to block me has the same mumbai origin. But please go to the details and if you can even give me a single reason that I have ever used any other account you may block me for ever! But I am giving you 100% assurance that I have never used any other account neither I will do that in future. It’s my humble request please unblock me and get my content restored

Decline reason:

As you have brought the matter before the arbitration team, you'll need to wait for their response. Yamla (talk) 17:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear respected admin Yamla thanks & Good Enough, Shall Wait for the response from arbitration team! Fridaykings (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]