User talk:Fransplace/Archive 1
Your contributed article, Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Millicent Preston-Stanley. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Millicent Preston-Stanley – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Grognard Chess (talk) Ping when replying 17:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC) Thank you Chess
Your contributed article, Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Millicent Preston-Stanley. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Millicent Preston-Stanley – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
A sincere thank you to you, Blue Rasberry (talk) for taking the time to let me know about this. I'm sorry for not replying sooner to your earlier comment on my talk page about the Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley page. This item was listed as an editathon subject (University of Sydney Wikibomb on 31 October) and the organisers didn't realise there was already an article about her (because the pre existing article didn't include her middle name so didn't appear in a search). So I worked on it and after moving it to the mainspace, found that an article already existed in a much more rudimentary form. I reported it and, after reading your first notice, I moved the information from my article that was new into the older article. It is therefore fine to delete the page I created. Is there anything else that I need to do? Thank you Frances Di Lauro 20:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2015 newsletter
[edit]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Project News
Article alerts Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Article alerts Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero. Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Food and drink articles by quality and importance
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 23:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial
[edit]Hello, Fcia0423. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Fcia0423/draft article on Confucius Statue
[edit]Hello, Fcia0423. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "draft article on Confucius Statue".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:52, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia Education Projects in Australia
[edit]Hi Fciao423, I'm Nichole the new regional focal point for the Wikipedia Education program in the Asia region. I wanted to introduce myself and see if there are any updates on Wikipedia Education Program projects in Australia. Feel free to reach out on my talk page or by email: nsaad@wikimedia.org Cheers! NSaad (WMF) (talk) 07:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Fcia0423. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion
[edit]As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
Fair Use in Australia campaign update
[edit]- I'm writing you this followup message, as you took the time to vote in support of a Wikipedia banner campaign for the introduction of Fair Use in Australia.
- After much planning and coordination with the WMF, Australian Digital Alliance, and Electronic Frontiers Australia, as of Monday the banner-campaign is active on English Wikipedia to a portion of logged-out readers in Australia (technical details). The banners direct people to this page on Meta: FairCopyrightOz. That page, alongside lots of information, further directs people towards the campaign website faircopyright.org.au where Australians are invited to write to their local MP to express support of Fair Use. If you are interested in supporting this campaign, please, send a letter yourself using the template letter provided at that link.
- Furthermore, and with the support of the ADA & EFA, we have received fantastic media coverage - with article "Fair Use: Wikipedia targets Australians in bid to change the law" appearing on page 2 of the Sydney Morning Herald and page 10 of the Melbourne Age on Monday's edition. It was for a time the 3rd most read article the Fairfax website, and Fair Use was "trending" on Twitter in Australia. We are running the account @FairCopyrightOz on twitter, and we are tracking other press-mentions on the talkpage on Meta.
- Today, day 2, we published a detailed post about the campaign on the Wikimedia Blog, ran an "Ask Me Anything" Q&A session on the Australia page in Reddit, and [by happy coincidence of timing] the article History of fair use proposals in Australia appeared on the en.wp mainpage as a Did You Know. [The creation of that "history of..." article was a specific request arising from in the community consultation in which you voted].
- And, most importantly, in a little more than a day nearly 800 letters to MPs have been sent encouraging them to support the Productivity Commission's recommendation to adopt Fair Use in Australia. I urge you - please add your own message.
- Sincerely, Wittylama 16:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: User:Fcia0423/draft article on Confucius Statue has a new comment
[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: draft article on Confucius Statue (June 2)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fcia0423/draft article on Confucius Statue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Fcia0423,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial
[edit]Hello, Fransplace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 20:42, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Fransplace. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Courses Modules are being deprecated
[edit]Hello,
Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.
Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! Sorry for writing in English. The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
--WMF Surveys (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Fransplace/draft article on Confucius Statue
[edit]Hello, Fransplace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "draft article on Confucius Statue".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Acalycine (talk) 03:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. Draft articles should be posted as such, in draft space, not in sandboxes. Problems with the article include
- it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that she meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the subject, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what she claims or interviewing her. Most of the article was unreferenced, and of the three references, two were just quoting her, and the third was a university site without public access. Incidentally, references should not be bare urls.
- She may be notable, but we need independent third-party sources, not her talking about herself
- it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: renowned... garnered a large amount of support nationally and even internationally... eager to participate.... has always been passionate about bringing about change to causes she feels need reform... her writing experience has provided her with the skills and confidence to speak to people on a national level– and so on, it's a hagiography not an encyclopaedia article, complete with numerous quotes from the article's subject, not exactly a reliable source.
- I notice that much of the text was added in chunks. I didn't check for copyright, but the editor should be aware that copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by her or her organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial, and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. As I say, there is no accusation here, but the editor is clearly not familiar with our policies, so just for guidance
The editor needs to make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, check that she can find independent third party sources and read Your first article.
Personally, I would suggest that that the editor starts again from scratch, but if you prefer, I could restore, clean up the worst of the opinions and promotion and move to a draft for referencing to proper sources. Let me know how you wish to proceed. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- I restored at Draft:Lane Murdock and made these changes to clean it up a bit, I hope that helps. As for the signature, as far as I know the tildes should only show what you have in the "Signature" box on your Preferences->user profile. Have you checked that? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Peer review
[edit]Hi Fransplace,
Was the OLES2129 class instructed to add their new articles to Wikipedia:Peer review? Or did you make use of some resource that suggested this? I've already raised the issue in the Wikipedia:Education noticeboard, but Wikipedia:Peer review is typically low volume, and most often used for more mature articles that have multiple contributors. Have you considered having students assigned to review each other's articles as a first step?Dialectric (talk) 18:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Minor Edits
[edit]Thanks for your comment at the Education Noticeboard about what's happening with the articles from your course. As a note, that comment should not have had the minor edit tag. That tag should only be used in limited circumstances like fixing a typo. You can see more about it at the link. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 06:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
useful tools
[edit]See User:Dr_pda/prosesize.js cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Also see Wikipedia:AutoEd/core.js Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Fransplace. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Hurley: The Man who Made History has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac (talk) 20:58, 26 December 2018 (UTC)OLES2129
[edit]Hello Fran. I notice several of your students striking requests at Wikipedia:Requested articles. Would you happen to know anything about this? I only ask because the appropriate action for students to take is to remove a request from RA once their article is complete. Striking only makes the process straining for the users that patrol this section of Wikipedia, who would see this as either a page already created or that a subject is not notable for the encyclopedia, which I do believe the subjects are notable if the students intend to work on them during the semester. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 21:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Bring your idea for Wikimedia in Education to life! Launch of the Wikimedia Education Greenhouse
[edit]|
Apply for Education Greenhouse  Are you passionate about open education? Do you have an idea to apply Wikimedia projects to an education initiative but don’t know where to start? Join the the Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse! It is an immersive co-learning experience that lasts 9 months and will equip you with the skills, knowledge and support you need to bring your ideas to life. You can apply as a team or as an individual, by May 12th. Find out more Education Greenhouse. For more information reachout to mguadalupe |
—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
OLES2129 students and image uploads/image use
[edit]Hi Fransplace. It appears that some of your students or at least students belong to OLES2129 at the University of Sydney are working on various drafts as part of a class project. I've come across their various drafts because they've been flagged for violations of Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. The students in question are VerumRex, Austinameo and Cecelia Chen Puying. These student have been trying to add non-free files to their drafts or user sandboxes which is not allowed per the aforementioned policy. The files have been removed on multiple occasions by different editors, but the students continued to re-add them.
Anyway, I asked a Wiki Ed advisor named Shalor (Wiki Ed) for help with this at User talk:Shalor (Wiki Ed) and she left some user talk page messages for the students. I've also left some user talk page messages for the students as well. I'm not sure how often the students check their user talk pages, but perhaps you could mention something about this to them during your class. You might also want to mention something about Wikipedia:Image use policy and c:Commons:Licensing as well because image use and licensing can be quite tricky and mistakes are often made.
FWIW, mistakes are OK as long as they're not being repeated over and over again, especially after warnings were given. Repeated violations or relevant policies and guidelines related to images in particular is one of the things which tends to dealt with rather harshly and often leads to an administrator quickly blocking an account to stop any further disruption. So, if your students have any questions about image use, they can always ask for help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions or even the Wikipedia Teahouse. Wiki Ed even has a training module specifically developed to help students with all things image related. Since 99of9 is also listed as one of the contacts for OLES2129, I've pinged him in this post. However, if you could also let him know just in case, then maybe he could let his students know about the training module as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Marchjuly. I'm not involved in this unit very directly, so there's no "his students", but I'm happy to be kept in the loop. --99of9 (talk) 11:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- My apologies if I mixed up who's teaching the course. You're both listed as contacts, so I mistook that for meaning you're both teaching the course. If, by chance, you do know any of three students mentioned above, perhaps you can tell them to be be careful about the images they're trying to use. Basically, anything existing on Wikipedia Commons is probably OK, but any uploaded locally to Wikipedia as non-free content needs to be used more carefully. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:57, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
University of Sydney Course
[edit]I like that you are giving courses on Wikipedia. But could you please request your students to check what they link? And only link when it adds something to the article?
Yesterday I worked on Cider Syrup, what was severely overlinked en included 74 links to disambiguation pages. Today I came across Eastern Ethics in Business, overlinked and with 40 links to disambiguation pages, and Rural Industry in India, overlinked and with 11 links to disambiguation pages.
I am worried by now. The Banner talk 22:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
OLES2129: Thank you!
[edit]Hi. Over the past few weeks, I've been reviewing a lot of the articles written by your OLES2129 students. Thank you for teaching this course! The collection of drafts I've been reviewing have been interesting, well-written, and on important topics which are enhancing the encyclopedia in many ways.
Wikipedia is a victim of its own success, attracting anybody and everybody who wants to use it for self-promotion, SEO, and advertising. It's is truly refreshing to see that there are still folks in the world who want to write the kinds of articles your students are writing. Thank you again, and please let your students know how much this is appreciated. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Not to throw cold water on the course, but there has been a problem with one of your students, YuxinJiang, creating and recreating a promotional article in draft and userspace, as well as not replying to other editors' comments. See this discussion at ANI. Perhaps you could have a word with the student? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
References
[edit]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.
- While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
- Then click on "templates",
- Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
- If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".
We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality article by OLES2129 student
[edit]Fransplace, I came across the article Predicate crime because I saw a reference to predicate crimes in the press, and didn't know what they were. It was an awful awful article in almost every way a Wikipedia article can be awful. It was incoherent, unclear, and poorly written. The writer clearly didn't understand the topic and grossly misrepresented the sources. Large amounts of irrelevant material are included. In the end, I had to delete almost all of it because it was irretrievably bad. I then looked to see who had added this low-quality material, and found that it was a certain User:Pattywinter, who had apparently written it for a course called OLES2129.
Now, I really really want to support new users on Wikipedia, and I'm very enthusiastic about encouraging university students to learn how to contribute to Wikipedia. But there has got to be some sort of quality control. Clearly no one at the University of Sydney reviewed the Predicate Crime article. Take a look at Pattywinter's final version. Forgetting the fact that it is disorganized, rambling, and generally wrong, it includes incoherent sentences like "It is an illegal action that opposed the public order and against the Law", "there was the Vienna Convention where the attention to money laundering is a phenomenon", and "Fines can be separated to the jail sentence" (from the original "Fines can be separate from, or in addition to, jail or prison sentences") and in ll cases the garbled paraphrase is in any case utterly irrelevant to the topic of the article). Footnotes are incorrect or incomplete.
This sort of material is not only a waste of Wikipedia editors' time, but a serious disservice to our readers. I implore you to exert more editorial control over your students' contributions! Thanks, --Macrakis (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
OLES2129
[edit]Fransplace, I come to you as one of the instructors of OLES 2129: Writing for the Digital World. I was first alerted to a problem when I came across the editing of Cookieminicatt at Spider roll. This student's writing on this page is unacceptable, and I have tried to warn them of this but they are pretty insistent on their very poorly written and formatted version of the page. From their user page, I find that they are being tutored by lboikov as part of this class which you are apparently running. I further find that there is an entire discussion of this class's prior activities at the Wikipedia Education Noticeboard. I hope that you will better monitor the activities of your students. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
PS: Might I recommend that you clean up your user talk page? Someone sent you a message at some point that completely hosed the formatting! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you, (@WikiDan61:). I'm very sorry to hear about this. I coordinate this course and have written to the student's teacher, who monitors the work of his student. You've written to him too. There are 15 teachers on the course and we do our best. Our students don't usually engage in edit wars and I apologise on behalf of us all. I note the earlier archived discussion took place during 6 months of inactivity. Our our course in that instance had finished 5 months earlier and I was recovering from major surgery. We appreciate your help and the considerate way in which you communicate with our students. We do impress on them the importance of treating all editors with respect and will reinforce those messages. Fransplace 13:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| Wonderful coordination of a huge education unit and committment to Wikipedia. Thank you for your hard work Carrolquadrio (talk) 00:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC) |
WikiProject Horror Newsletter - August 2020
[edit] | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
[edit]
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Bring your idea for Wikimedia in Education to life! Launch of the Wikimedia Education Greenhouse
[edit]|
Apply for Education Greenhouse Are you passionate about open education? Do you have an idea to apply Wikimedia projects to an education initiative but don’t know where to start? Join the the Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse! It is an immersive co-learning experience that lasts 9 months and will equip you with the skills, knowledge and support you need to bring your ideas to life. You can apply as a team or as an individual, by May 12th. Find out more Education Greenhouse. For more information reachout to mguadalupe |
—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
A cookie for you!
[edit]
|
thanks for the smile! :) Pinklily08 (talk) 11:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC) |
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Discussion at WP:THQ § Student had material removed
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at WP:THQ § Student had material removed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- This might be one of your students since they're using the template we've been discussing at Template talk:AuEduNewbie. If they are, perhaps you can help them out; if not, perhaps you could let their tutor know that one of their students is looking for assistance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Greetings
[edit]Hi Fran: Just dropping by to say hello; I've been helping one of your students (KyleA94) with an assessment for the chestnut-bellied sandgrouse article. In the future, please feel free to ping the WP:BIRD group if you've got a student who would like to work on a bird article. We're happy to help answer questions, provide editing tips, steer research, suggest or provide references, give article assessments, etc. With 20,000+ articles in our remit and only 40 or so active members, we could use all the help we can get! ;) Best regards, MeegsC (talk) 13:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
This Month in Education: November 2020
[edit]This Month in Education: January 2021
[edit]| This Month in Education
Volume 10 • Issue 1 • January 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse
|
This Month in Education: January 2021
[edit]| This Month in Education
Volume 10 • Issue 1 • January 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse
|
This Month in Education: February 2021
[edit]| This Month in Education
Volume 10 • Issue 2 • February 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse |
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]
|
Hope all is well and things have calmed down a bit after a crazy year that 2020 was. Will try and catch up at some stage, though might be a month or two until I get an opportunity to visit Sydney. Bidgee (talk) 00:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC) |
This Month in Education: March 2021
[edit]| This Month in Education
Volume 10 • Issue 3 • March 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse
|
Fixed your talk page archiving
[edit]Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. I also decided to change it to use incremental archives, since you already have /Archive 1, and the next one will just be /Archive 2 --rchard2scout (talk) 13:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: April 2021
[edit]This Month in Education: May 2021
[edit]Glad to have your help!
[edit]Thanks for being so encouraging to these young writers. (Isn't this a cool story of which to be a part?) It always helps me when just for doing the right thing, someone pats me on the back and says thanks! Encouragement like yours is motivating. If we can help you, I'm certain wikipedians are standing by to do so. Don't be shy if you need to learn something or need student coaching. I'm even farther away from Sydney than Nashville. BusterD (talk) 01:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
New message from Chess
[edit] You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Education noticeboard § RfC on banning word or edit counts for student assignments. Chess (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 23:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: June 2021
[edit]This Month in Education: July 2021
[edit]This Month in Education: August 2021
[edit]This Month in Education: September 2021
[edit]| This Month in Education
Volume 10 • Issue 9 • September 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue |
This Month in Education: October 2021
[edit]| This Month in Education
Volume 10 • Issue 10 • October 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue
|
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
[edit]Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
This Month in Education: November 2021
[edit]This Month in Education: November 2021
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Students editing Paralympic Wikipedia articles
[edit]Frances - I would love to talk to you about including Paralympic articles in your course if that is possible. We still have so much to be done and there are lots of options that could be of interest, from stubs to images, etc. Tony.naar (talk) 09:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This Month in Education: January 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 1 • January 2022
Contents • Headlines • Subscribe
In This Issue
- 30-h Wikipedia Article Writing Challenge
- Announcing Wiki Workshop 2022
- Final exhibition about Cieszyn Silesia region
- Join us this February for the EduWiki Week
- Offline Education project WikiChallenge closed its third edition
- Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom ToT Experience of a Filipina Wikimedian
- Welcoming new trainers of the Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom program
- Wikimedia Israel’s education program: Students enrich Hebrew Wiktionary with Biblical expressions still in use in modern Hebrew
This Month in Education: February 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 2 • February 2022
Contents • Headlines • Subscribe
- Open Foundation West Africa Expands Open Movement With UHAS
- Celebrating the 18th anniversary of Ukrainian Wikipedia
- Integrating Wikipedia in the academic curriculum in a university in Mexico
- Results of "Reading Wikipedia" workshop in the summer school of Plan Ceibal in Uruguay
- WikiFundi, offline editing plateform : last release notes and how-tos
- Writing Wikipedia as an academic assignment in STEM fields
- The Learning and Connection – 1Lib1Ref with African Librarians
This Month in Education: March 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 3 • March 2022
Contents • Headlines • Subscribe
In This Issue
- Arte+Feminismo Pilipinas:Advocacy on Women Empowerment
- The edit-a-thon on Serbian Wikipedia on the occasion of Edu Wiki Week
- Call for Participation: Higher Education Survey
- Collection of Good Practices in Wikipedia Education
- Conversation: Open education in the Wikimedia Movement views from Latin America
- EduWiki Week 2022, celebrations and learnings
- EduWiki Week in Armenia
- Open Education Week at the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
- Wikipedia + Education Talk With Leonard Hagan
- Wikimedia Israel cooperates with Yad Vashem in developing a training course for teachers
This Month in Education: April 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 4 • April 2022
Contents • Headlines • Subscribe
In This Issue
- Audio-Educational Seminar of Wikimedia Mexico
- Dagbani Wikimedians using digital TV broadcast to train Wikipedia contributors in Ghana
- Digital Education & The Open Space With Herbert Acheampong
- HerStory walks as a part of edit-a-thons
- Join us for Wiki Workshop 2022
- The youngest member of Tartu Wikiclub is 15-year-old student
A kitten for you!
[edit]
Happy editing!
Wikianonymous09 (talk) 04:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This Month in Education: May 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 5 • May 2022
Contents • Headlines • Subscribe
In This Issue
- Wiki Hackathon in Kwara State
- Introduction of the Wikimedia Fan Club to Kwara State University Malete
- Education in Kosovo
- Bringing the Wikiprojects to the Island of Catanduanes
- Tyap Wikipedia Goes Live
- Spring 1Lib1Ref edition in Poland
- Tyap Editors Host Maiden Wiktionary In-person Training Workshop
- Wikibooks project in teaching
- Africa Eduwiki Network Hosted Conversation about Wikimedian in Education with Nebojša Ratković
- My Journey In The Wiki-Space By Thomas Baah
This Month in Education: May 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 5 • May 2022
Contents • Headlines • Subscribe
In This Issue
- Wiki Hackathon in Kwara State
- Introduction of the Wikimedia Fan Club to Kwara State University Malete
- Education in Kosovo
- Bringing the Wikiprojects to the Island of Catanduanes
- Tyap Wikipedia Goes Live
- Spring 1Lib1Ref edition in Poland
- Tyap Editors Host Maiden Wiktionary In-person Training Workshop
- Wikibooks project in teaching
- Africa Eduwiki Network Hosted Conversation about Wikimedian in Education with Nebojša Ratković
- My Journey In The Wiki-Space By Thomas Baah
This Month in Education: June 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 6 • June 2022
- Black Lunch Table: Black History Month with Igbo Wikimedians User Group
- Bolivian Teachers Welcomed Wikipedia in their Classroom
- Educational program & Wikivoyage in Ukrainian University
- The Great Learning and Connection: Experience from AFLIA
- New Mexico Students Join Wikimedia Movement Through WikiForHumanRights Campaign
- The school wiki-project run by a 15 year old student came to an end
- The students of Kadir Has University, Istanbul contribute Wikimedia projects in "Civic Responsibility Project" course
- Wiki Trip with Vasil Kamami Wikiclub to Berat, the town of one thousand windows
- Wikiclubs in Albania
- Wikidata in the classroom FGGC Bwari Experience
- Wikipedia and Secondary Schools in Aotearoa New Zealand
- А large-scale online course for teaching beginners to work in Wikipedia has been developed in Russia
This Month in Education: July 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 7 • July 2022
This Month in Education: August 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 8 • August 2022
- The Making of a Certified Trainer of Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom
- Wikimania SDGs 2022: The Kwara Experience
- An adapted Module teacher’s guide in Yoruba and English about Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom in Nigeria is now available on Commons
- Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Kwara, Nigeria: The Trainers Experience
- Edu Wiki Camp 2022 in Serbia: Together again
- Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Program Nigeria: The Teacher experience
- Wiki For Senior Citizens
- WikiLoves SDGs Nigeria Tours Kwara State University Malete
- Wikiteka project in Poland - summertime
Ten Years on Wikipedia!
[edit] | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Fransplace! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 10th anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! Chris Troutman (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC) |  |
Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
[edit]
Dear Fransplace/Archive 1,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
This Month in Education: September 2022
[edit]This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 9 • September 2022
- OpenEdu.ch: centralising training documents, a platform for the teachers' community in Switzerland
- Senior Citizens WikiTown 2022: Exploring Olomouc and its heritage
- Wikimedia Research Fund
- Wikimedia Youths Commemorate the International Youth Day 2022 in an exciting way across the globe
- Wikipedia, Education, and the Crisis of Information
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)