User talk:FrankNSteinJr

Welcome!

Hello, FrankNSteinJr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kyle McMahon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kyle McMahon. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi FrankNSteinJr! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need Review of Draft for First Article :), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi FrankNSteinJr! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Next step for AfC?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello FrankNSteinJr. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:FrankNSteinJr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=FrankNSteinJr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Apologies if mistaken but I thought it better to offer some words of warning should this situation apply, in light of a report filed off-site about sollicitation for paid editing. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 21:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not at all applicable to me, in any sense of the word. I joined this to work on Delaware related things, which as you can see is mostly what I’ve done. Additionally, I have no idea what I’m doing so I certainly couldn’t charge any one lol. In fact, I’m not sure if there is a way to see but every step of the way I’ve reached out to wiki editors for guidance. FrankNSteinJr (talk) 22:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyle McMahon has been accepted

Kyle McMahon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 01:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly for your help! FrankNSteinJr (talk) 17:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Culture Weekly moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pop Culture Weekly, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 10:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DMySon Apologies for this. Didn't mean to send to publish. Will work on this over the next few weeks.

Regards FRANKY (talk) 02:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an old message. Where were you lost? DMySon (talk) 05:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to save the page to my drafts as I worked on it, but accidentally hit Publish instead. FRANKY (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pop Culture Weekly

Hello, FrankNSteinJr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pop Culture Weekly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyle McMahon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle McMahon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle McMahon (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Liz I apologize for the tardiness of this. Had a death in the family which took me off line for a bit. Left a response on your Talk Page.

Regards.

Franky FRANKY (talk) 02:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Billy The Kid (Streaming Series)

Hello, FrankNSteinJr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Billy The Kid (Streaming Series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Billy The Kid (Streaming Series)

Hello, FrankNSteinJr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Billy The Kid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]