User talk:FlorinCornianu

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, FlorinCornianu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:123FormBuilder, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 123FormBuilder (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:123FormBuilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FlorinCornianu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:123FormBuilder, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:FlorinCornianu, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=FlorinCornianu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'm sorry, I didn't understand what you were referring to. I'm a connected contributor, where I should place this? In the user page? Thanks! FlorinCornianu (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per the instructions "you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:FlorinCornianu". Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've made the changes, inserted the "connected contributor", added extra references and republished the draft again. I want to be sure it will be reviewed. Thanks! FlorinCornianu (talk) 13:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your disclosure is incorrectly formatted and there is nothing on your user page. You are a paid editor and must make the required disclosure per the terms and conditions. Theroadislong (talk) 13:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:FlorinCornianu, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=FlorinCornianu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Theroadislong (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 123FormBuilder (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not one of the sources cited contributes to WP:NCORP notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:123FormBuilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 123FormBuilder (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:123FormBuilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing again

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 14:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand were to include the proper tag. If I add it in the source page

FlorinCornianu, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by 123FormBuilder for their contributions to Wikipedia.

, it says that I should place it in the talk pages. What I'm doing wrong?

If I add this in the draft source page {{connected contributor}} it says the same think. I sincerely, don't understand where should I place what? I'm an employee at 123FormBuilder and I'm trying to create this wiki page for 123FormBuilder. FlorinCornianu (talk) 16:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:FlorinCornianu, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=FlorinCornianu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Theroadislong (talk) 17:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've inserted the paid contributor tag in my user page, hope it's ok now. FlorinCornianu (talk) 08:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is correctly done now. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 123FormBuilder (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:123FormBuilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 13:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:123FormBuilder has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:123FormBuilder. Thanks! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 14:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help and patience! FlorinCornianu (talk) 15:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, What I should do next? I should resubmit the draft as it is right now? Thanks! FlorinCornianu (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 123FormBuilder (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:123FormBuilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 14:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've changed this article a lot in order to be neutral and I also eliminated Forbes articles and all the points every reviewer recommended. At this point, I don't understand why this page gets rejected. You can also check to see other form builders pages and see they that point to their own blog post articles so this is not neutral at all. So please advice, what to do next? Thanks! FlorinCornianu (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 123FormBuilder (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is disruptive to re-submit with zero improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:123FormBuilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 123FormBuilder (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:123FormBuilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 17:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:123FormBuilder

Hello, FlorinCornianu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:123FormBuilder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:123FormBuilder

Hello, FlorinCornianu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "123FormBuilder".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:23, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]