User talk:Filippo Morsiani

Filippomorsiani, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Filippomorsiani! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in France

A tag has been placed on Open Access in France requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/access-by-region/europe-and-north-america/france/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Adem20^talk 09:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Benin

Hello Filippo Morsiani,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Open Access in Benin for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

MereTechnicality ⚙ 12:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Angola

Hello Filippo Morsiani,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Open Access in Angola for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

MereTechnicality ⚙ 12:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Filippo Morsiani. You have new messages at MereTechnicality's talk page.
Message added 14:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

MereTechnicality ⚙ 14:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Open Access in France, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 16:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Filippo! I have removed the tag again as an independent reviewer, as I note the GOAP does indeed publish under a compatible free license. As you mentioned that you are affiliated with this portal, can you see about adding the CC license to all pages under the GOAP? Right now the only copyright notice that appears is Unsesco's default page footer which asserts copyright over all content, so is understandably causing confusion among our reviewers here. If the CC license can be added to all GOAP content, or the default Unseco copyright page can be modified to mention this, that will prevent a lot of ongoing problems as you import that content here.

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance or answer any questions, thanks! Crow^Caw 16:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Open Access in Yemen) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Open Access in Yemen, Filippo Morsiani!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 13:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Open access in United Arab Emirates) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Open access in United Arab Emirates, Filippo Morsiani!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 13:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open Access in Andorra

The article Open Access in Andorra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability. No need to write (or copy) an article for every country, if nothing can be said about that country and it hasn't received the necessary attention required by WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Italy

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Italy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Open_Access_in_Italy&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FITINDIA (talk) 15:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Israel

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Israel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Open_Access_in_Israel&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FITINDIA (talk) 15:24, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Ireland

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Open_Access_in_Ireland&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FITINDIA (talk) 15:24, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Hungary

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Hungary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Open_Access_in_Hungary&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FITINDIA (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Iceland

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Iceland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Open_Access_in_Iceland&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FITINDIA (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Greece

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Greece requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Open_Access_in_Greece&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FITINDIA (talk) 15:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Georgia

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Georgia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Open_Access_in_Georgia&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FITINDIA (talk) 15:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Germany

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Germany requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Open_Access_in_Germany&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FITINDIA (talk) 15:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Finland

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Finland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Open_Access_in_Finland&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FITINDIA (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are obviously getting a lot of messages and notices

It would really help if you could get a handle on WP:RS and WP:CITE to help the articles that you are creating - to have adequate WP:V for WP:N - it would also help if you get a handle on projects tags on the talk pages. Please feel free to ask anything about anything - cheers JarrahTree 10:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, probably a clear understanding of the way that WP:LEAD works in the initial sentence, and also the initial paragraph in wikipedia articles... well worth checking out very carefully... JarrahTree 11:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JarrahTree I have been migrating lots of content from UNESCO Global Open Access Portal, Please check links below https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_Nations/Open_Access_Descriptions http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/

all the articles are sourced and all the unesco goap pages have this tag "The content of this page is available under CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0." Is there is a way to contest the deletion of all the above pages at once? Any help would be much appreciated Filippo Morsiani

I would strongly suggest that you go to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Open Access and Wikipedia:WikiProject Open project talk pages, and ask for help there from editors experienced in the area - I do not think saying it is from the portal is enough... There needs to be some attempt to WP:Wikify parts of the pages... my intuition is the lead paragraph/lead sentence in each needs to be more in tune with usual practice in wikipedia.

Go to the talk pages at Open Access and Open - In my opinion - you need to explain that you wish to have help in improving the articles - rather than contesting deletion - as once there is an established form or improvement - then you can always used a 'saved' articles as a template/model, and go to re-create. Buy there is always 2 sides to this - maybe an advocate from the Open or Open Access project is able to help you to argue the validity of your articles. It can go both ways. Never give up, and always realise that there will be people prepared to help you. JarrahTree 12:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am wikifying some of the articles that have been copied over into Wikipedia, one significant problem is that not everything that is in the UNESCO Open Access articles is suitable for Wikipedia, such as contact details for organisations. Creating an intro for the Wikipedia article is obviously important, and if you would copy over not the entire UNESCO article (be a bit more selective about the parts you move over) it would save a lot of work. I do think this is an important initiative and on balance the UNESCO articles are a good start for a Wikipedia article. Peabodybore (talk) 08:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will chip in: please learn how to add proper categories to your article (ex. [1]), talk page notices (see talk page of article I linked), please add hyperlinks, please attribute sources properly (you state the article is under a CC license, but you don't name the source). It is great you want to help, but your articles are very messy. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Open access in Algeria) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Open access in Algeria, Filippo Morsiani!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 20:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Open access in the United States of America) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Open access in the United States of America, Filippo Morsiani!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 20:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open Access in Puerto Rico

Hello, Filippo Morsiani. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Open Access in Puerto Rico, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nsk92 (talk) 02:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open Access in Peru

Hello, Filippo Morsiani. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Open Access in Peru, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nsk92 (talk) 02:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and categories

I'll need to add my voice to those above recommending that when you create a new article you include in-line sourcing (or, at worst, some kind of sourcing), as well as applicable categories. It's great that what you're adding is already compatible with the copyright Wikipedia needs to work with, but including both of those things would be a great assistance.
Additionally, I can see from some of your recent edits that you've indicated that your articles are sourced, which I assume is a reference to the "List of Publications" section. While those may well be the references you're intending, it's not entirely clear from the articles you're creating that that's the case. You may want to have a look at WP:IC for an explanation of how best to do this, as it covers the process everyone is at least trying to work within. Feel free to reply either here or on my Talk page if you have any further questions. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in San Marino

The article Open access in San Marino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As Open access apparently isn't a "thing" in San Marino, the notability of the subject is questionable. Article is unreferenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Monaco

The article Open access in Monaco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per the article, Open access is apparently not a "thing" in Monaco, which calls into question the notability of the subject. Article is also unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Haiti

The article Open access in Haiti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there presently is no open access in Haiti. Notability of subject in question

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Uzbekistan

The article Open access in Uzbekistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article indicating that open access isn't a "thing" in Uzbekistan. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Tajikistan

The article Open access in Tajikistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that open access is not a concept in Tajikistan. Subject is therefore non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Mongolia

The article Open access in Mongolia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that Mongolia does not currently have open access. Subject is therefore non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Maldives

The article Open access in Maldives has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that the Maldives does not currently have open access. Subject is therefore non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Afghanistan

The article Open access in Afghanistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that open access is yet to catch on in Afghanistan. Non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Georgia

The article Open access in Georgia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that open access has not really caught on in Georgia. Non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Belarus

The article Open access in Belarus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Belarus. Non-notable subject, therefore

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Azerbaijan

The article Open access in Azerbaijan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Azerbaijan. Non-notable subject, therefore

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Syrian Arab Republic

The article Open access in Syrian Arab Republic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Syria. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Palestine

The article Open access in Palestine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Palestine. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:32, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Bahrain

The article Open access in Bahrain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Bahrain. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Swaziland

The article Open access in Swaziland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Swaziland. Therefore, non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Sierra Leone

The article Open access in Sierra Leone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that open access is practically nonexistent in Sierra Leone. Therefore, a non-notable topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Seychelles

The article Open access in Seychelles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Seychelles. Therefore, a non-notable topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Sao Tome and Principe

The article Open access in Sao Tome and Principe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Sao Tome and Principe. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Niger

The article Open access in Niger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating there is practically no open access in Niger. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Mozambique

The article Open access in Mozambique has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Mozambique. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Liberia

The article Open access in Liberia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating there is practically no open access in Liberia. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Eritrea

The article Open access in Eritrea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Eritrea. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Democratic Republic of the Congo

The article Open access in Democratic Republic of the Congo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in the DRC. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Congo

The article Open access in Congo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Congo. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Chad

The article Open access in Chad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in Chad. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Central African Republic

The article Open access in Central African Republic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating that there is practically no open access in the CAR. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Burundi

The article Open access in Burundi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating there is practically no open access in Burundi. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:37, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Burkina Faso

The article Open access in Burkina Faso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating there is practically no open access in Burkina Faso. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Benin

The article Open access in Benin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating there is practically no open access in Benin. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Open access in Angola

The article Open access in Angola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article indicating there is practically no open access in Angola. Therefore, a non-notable subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Unreferenced" status on Open access in Burkina Faso

I notice that you've indicated in your edit summary (on removing the PROD tag) that this article is referenced. It is not. There isn't a single in-line citation anywhere in the article. Under the "Sources" heading, there's a mention that it "incorporates text from a free content work", which is wonderful, but that's not a "reference" by any means. Please take the time to familiarise yourself with the preferred methodology for citing sources on Wikipedia, which is linked in comments that I and others have left earlier on your Talk page. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to your comment on my Talk page, having missed the earlier notification. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:11, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Open access in Burkina Faso for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Open access in Burkina Faso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open access in Burkina Faso until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Open access in Belarus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Open access in Belarus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open access in Belarus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Open access in Canada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Open access in Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open access in Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Access in Palestine, State Of

A tag has been placed on Open Access in Palestine, State Of requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/access-by-region/arab-states/palestine. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. I've given you a final warning as you purposely removed nearly a dozen or more AFD notices on articles. Do not remove them unless the discussion has been closed and consensus reached. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 10:05, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article creation

The huge volume of articles that you have created that have been deleted or are marked for deletion is bordering on disruptive editing. It's great that you are adding material but you need to do it properly and follow procedures. Please learn from these guidelines and the advice given above. If you don't, you risk getting blocked. -- $Brookie :) { - like the mist - there one moment and then gone!} (Whisper...)$ 15:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Open access in France

A tag has been placed on Open access in France, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John of Reading (talk) 12:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please address the concerns voiced in the deletion discussion before re-posting the article. If you want to contest the outcome of the deletion discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open access in Vietnam), you can use deletion review. —Kusma (t·c) 13:17, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion process

In the interests of trying to prevent a poor outcome for a user who still seems to have his heart in the right place, I think it might be a good idea to summarise some of the issues regarding the deletion process which seem to be tripping you up of late. Please remember that every single person who's put a template on this page is trying to help both you and Wikipedia in general, but doing what you're expressly being counselled not to do is rapidly becoming disruptive:

Editing pages at Articles for Deletion: If an article you create or read is listed at AfD, there's nothing wrong with editing the article itself. The issue is when you remove the tag saying "this article is currently being considered for deletion, please click here to see the discussion". In other words, if the article on (to take a hypothetical) open access in Vietnam says that there are 15 institutions participating and you realise that's a mistake, you're perfectly free to replace "15" with the correct figure. Removing the link to the AfD discussion, however, is expressly not allowed. The tag itself even says so. That's because people are able to click on the link in the template and contribute to the discussion about the deletion. No link, no ability.

Contributing to Articles for Deletion discussions: You're welcome to contribute to these, but you need to do so when the discussion is open. In relation to the "Open access in Vietnam" discussion, it was closed in the middle of July. Jumping into it ten days or so after it was closed (and the wording at the top says things like "Please do not modify it" and "No further edits should be made to this page") isn't the way to go. There are, as you've been advised, other methods to retrieve deleted content. Once a deletion discussion is closed, most users stop paying attention to it, because consensus was reached.

Side note: I can see that you tend to have periods of inactivity between edits, and it may well be that a number of these deletions have happened while you've been busy. While I can appreciate that that's annoying (it happened to me some years ago that articles I'd created were deleted while I was on holiday), that's how it goes. I've suggested before that it may be worthwhile creating new content as a Draft first and then moving it into Mainspace when it's ready, and that way you won't run the risk of someone "killing it off" behind your back quite so easily.

Recreating deleted content: Not a good idea, as you've probably seen already. Once an article is deleted through AfD, simply recreating the same wall of text is something which an admin can delete on sight. No discussion, no objection. Just zap and gone. I've seen users get blocked for doing that too many times, too, so I'd really suggest another way around.

A couple of other thoughts, too, which have occurred to me. I understand that your "goal" is to get articles about open access into the main body of Wikipedia. That's admirable, it really is. Can I please ask you to have a look at the way articles normally look around here, though? You'll probably see that they aren't just undifferentiated walls of text - they have links to other articles and so on, for one thing. You'll also notice that there's a manual of style that we all try to use, and that phrases like "Palestine, State Of" really aren't in keeping with that. I know that's how the original text might put it, but that's because UNESCO's manual of style is different to Wikipedia's.
In fact, it might be worth your while to have a look at the "adopt-a-user" program. There are plenty of highly-experienced users out there who'll be happy to step you through everything you need to know in order to create really good articles. I don't have the time to help in this regard, sadly, but there are some very good people there, including a couple of other admins. If you have further questions about this, please feel free to ask on my Talk page (or that of the user adopting you, if you go that way). BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]