User talk:Fernirm

This user may have left Wikipedia. Fernirm has not edited Wikipedia since 1 April 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Fernirm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Doc Quintana (talk) 04:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Dekasegi. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. According to the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the number of Mexican citizens in Japan is quite small at roughly 2000 individuals [1], as compared to nearly 60,000 Peruvians [2] or 320,000 Brazilians [3]. Furthermore, the article you created, Asian Mexican, is completely unsourced except for a genetic study of mestizos (which doesn't have anything to do with immigration from Asia to Mexico). cab (talk) 07:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please continue this discussion at Talk:Asian Mexican. cab (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Mexican

Speedy deletion nomination of Asian Mexican

You may also wish to consider using the the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asian Mexican, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Full of provocative statements - in fact not one source is provide for the entire article - Original creator even admits - I don't know if they're true, I just copied info from OTHER WIKI articles

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Moxy (talk) 08:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michio Kaku

I have reverted your recent edit as it is meaningless. Please stop adding your own POV to articles. – ukexpat (talk) 20:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here we are again pls stop this disruptive edits ...if your not sure what a nationality is dont change it..as you have done two this article many times.05:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to Mexican people. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 20:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor must not perform more than three reverts (as defined Here) on a single page within a 24-hour period.

. Pls try and be civil. Moxy (talk) 01:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Mexican American constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 05:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Asian Mexican

An editor has nominated Asian Mexican, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Mexican and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:02, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Melting Pot

The above article is about to be greatly revamped and cleaned up. Please help!--Gniniv (talk) 05:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mexican people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 01:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mi apoyo con White Mexican

Supongo que tu lengua materna es el español; si no es así, decimelo en mi Talk page y traduciré todo esto. Quiero decirte que el artículo White Argentine está sufriendo iguales problemas a los de White Mexican. Apareció un italiano, Giovanni (GiovBag), con supuestas credenciales de antropólogo, y ha emprendido una campaña contra los artículos sobre las comunidades blancas de Hispano-américa, apoyado por un legalista inglés (Andy the Grump), que inventó una sub-regla sobre etnicidad en la BLP, y ahora la quiere hacer cumplir a rajatabla en todos lados. Antes de que él empezara a vandalizar los artículos, guardé White Mexican, White Latin American y otros artículos similares en otra wiki, así que cuando esta locura del "tano" pase, todo puede ser restablecido a su estado original. Si hay algo en los que te pueda ayudar, contá conmigo.--Pablozeta (talk) 20:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whites in Mexico

The problem is not if there is population of European origin in Latin America or not (in fact, no one has doubted). And is an very interesting subject. The problem is that there was never existed as ethnic groups, white people for each country (White Argentine, White Mexican, White Colombian, White Chilean, White Italian, etc.). Contrary to what happens with many African-Americans communities in Mexico, Argentina, Perú, Brazil, Uruguay or Chile, who are constituted as a group, "white" people have never done, because they themselves are of different ethnic groups. There are "Mexican of Spanish origin" or "German", "Italian", "British", etc.. but all of them together do not exist as "ethnic group". This is the problem. As a category, "White" exists and the United States, Brazil or Australia, but not in Spanish America. The people of European origin are organized by nationalities (colonias or colectividades). I understand that seek to make alliances, but be careful, to make one who believes that a neo-Nazi site finds "understanding". And please write in English, not only is it rude to write in a language everyone understands, is against the rules.--GiovBag (talk) 22:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Am sorry, I know you are not write in spanish, it did it another guy. But, is very rude for the other users, write in a lenguage that only you could understand. Better a bad english (am italian), than another language. Regads. --GiovBag (talk) 16:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Propuesta para pedir modificación de la política sobre BPV, pero todos juntos.

Hola gente: Dadas las recientes y actuales guerras de ediciones que se han desatado en los artículos White Argentine, White Mexican, White Latin American y otros similares, debido a la modificación de la ´política sobre biografía de personas vivas concerniente a etnicidad -que los usuarios Andy the Grump y GiovBag quieren implementar a rajatabla en todos los artículos- propongo:

Solicitar en el Noticeboard correspondiente -aún no sé cuál sería, pero seguro que hay uno- que se revean los alcances de tal política. Creo que todos estaremos de acuerdo que nadie podría afirmar "Ronald Reagan era un Afro-estadounidense" porque tal afirmación salta a la vista como falsa. O también que nadie podría afirmar "Juan Manuel Fangio era de ascendencia croata" cuando es bien sabido que sus padres eran italianos. Pero creo que debe ser revisado que no se pueda categorizar a una persona como "blanco" cuando esté bien referenciada su ascendencia europea y comprobado con una fotografía su fenotipo caucásico.

Bueno, contáctenme a ver que les parece esta propuesta. De ser positiva su respuesta, debemos hacerla todos juntos, para que tenga más fuerza. Gracias por su atención.--Pablozeta (talk) 22:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of assassinations and acts of terrorism against Americans (USA)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of assassinations and acts of terrorism against Americans (USA) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

North Mexico listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect North Mexico. Since you had some involvement with the North Mexico redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:18, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

American Mexico listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect American Mexico. Since you had some involvement with the American Mexico redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Fernirm. Every single article is independent than the other ones, and Wikipedia is made step by step. To fix one article it is not necessary fix them all. The infobox "Ethnic group" must to be remove, because "White Mexicans" is not a recognized ethnic group and put it here constitutes a violation of policies. Please, see the discussion of "White Argentine" [4] is the same issue.--GiovBag (talk) 11:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Discrimination in the United States a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 03:39, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Placido Domingo

Hello Ferninrm, and thank you for your contributions. Please read Talk:Plácido Domingo/archive/Placido a Mexican Citizen? and please remember that references have to be provided for any changes. From your edit history I think you might be mexican... no-one denies that Placido Domingo has strong ties with Mexico:

lived there from the age of 5 until his early 20s (then he moved to Israel and since then has lived in the NY met area).
has married twice with a mexican
provided support for the victims of the terrible earthquake in Mexico City
has sung mexican traditional songs

However no source shows that he is currently, and legally a Mexican citizen. Actually sources show that he was born in Spain to Spanish parents, holds spanish nationality and was given the Order of the Aztec Eagle by the mexican government, an honor that is only given to non-mexicans. The article explains these and also his ties with Mexico, but nationality is not an emotional state but a legal fact and an encyclopedic article has to how this. Best.--Karljoos (talk) 12:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turkic peoples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gagauz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article discussion

Please discuss editing of the article Europe on Talk:Europe, not my talk page. Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 07:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic dialects

Hello, I saw your post about Arabic dialects and you seem to be knowledgeable in them. Have there been any studies on Arabic dialects in Central Asia? I would love to find any scholarly works detailing the uniqueness of Central Asian Arabic. Also, I am especially interested in finding if there has been any study to show that Andalusian Arabic has survived (in North Africa). There are villages and cities in North Africa that are settled and populated by descendants of Andalusian Muslim refugees from Spain/Portugal and I would love to know if those people still speak in Andalusian Arabic.

Regards, --Fernirm (talk) 09:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is an article about Khorasan Arabic by Ulrich Seeger, which was translated into English: http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/md/semitistik/seeger-khorasan1.pdf . An other article in German contains a text in Khorasan Arabic: http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/md/semitistik/seeger-chorasan2.pdf . Here you can hear how Khorasan Arabic sounds like: http://semarch.uni-hd.de/tondokumente.php43?&GR_ID=&ORT_ID=13&DOK_ID=92&lang=de http://semarch.uni-hd.de/tondokumente.php43?&GR_ID=&ORT_ID=13&DOK_ID=93&lang=de http://semarch.uni-hd.de/tondokumente.php43?&GR_ID=&ORT_ID=215&DOK_ID=1859&lang=detondokumente.php43?&GR_ID=&ORT_ID=215&DOK_ID=1859&lang=de There is also an article about Khorasan Arabic in the German Wikipedia: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chorasan-Arabisch There are similar dialects in Usbekistan and Afghanistan.

Concerning Andalusian Arabic I don't really know much: as far as I know it's extinct, but who really knows, if there are remnants somewhere in North Africa. --Metron (talk) 23:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

South Mexico listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect South Mexico. Since you had some involvement with the South Mexico redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 10:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

South Mexico listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect South Mexico. Since you had some involvement with the South Mexico redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 23:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"South Mexico" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect South Mexico. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27#South Mexico until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]