User talk:FelitaSandrin

Ways to improve Mark Morro

Hello, FelitaSandrin,

Thank you for creating Mark Morro.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Articles need to be in-depth about the subject, not tangential or simple mentions.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Onel5969,

Thank you for sharing your thoughts and remarks. However, I'm positive the article contains adequate secondary and independent mentions. And it fulfills the general notability guidelines. But as per your suggestion, I'll try to improve the article and discuss with you any concerns or ideas I have in the meantime.

FelitaSandrin (talk) 10:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Morro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Morro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Morro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you editors have to target other editors who are actively taking part on Wikipedia compared to promotions and advertising articles from commercially available bots? Pathetic, Onel5969 ^{TT me.}

FelitaSandrin (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

--Blablubbs (talk) 21:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]