User talk:Favouredprince
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Favouredprince! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 22:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Wow this is indeed an honor for an administrator to notice me on wikipedia, I really appreciate and I will love to getassistance from you as I make more edits, thanks Favouredprince (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dj Kelblizz
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dj Kelblizz, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Kelblizz. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Dj Kelblizz
[edit]Hi. I see you're trying to promote Dj Kelblizz. This is not allowed. You did not disclose your conflict of interest. You also violated our rules by moving the draft directly into the main namespace, instead of waiting patiently. Now you are foolishly pleading for assistance. If Wikipedia wants to have an article about someone, we will write it. We don't need your help. I understand this is frustrating, as you want to see this Wikipedia article for many reasons. This isn't your website so you don't control what happens here and I think you misunderstand how Wikipedia works. I think you would be better off on Facebook. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:45, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
I’m sad Favouredprince (talk) 00:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Do not move drafts
[edit]Do not do this again. You lack both the competence and understanding inclusion requirements as evidenced by your single, badly sourced creation here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 01:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Friendly warning
[edit]You must stop trying to circumvent community consensus by creating new versions of articles that have been deleted as a result of discussion. I am sorry to say that thus far, you have not proven yourself a benefit to the Wikipedia project, and further activity like what you've been doing will result in your account being blocked.
You have been given advice on how to proceed: Start an article in draft space and submmit it for review. Follow the directions at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. You apparently need more experience before you can be comfortable writing an acceptable article for article space.
If you have any connection whatsoever to the subjects you are writing about, you must disclose that, in accordance with our guidelines about conflict of interest. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.